Herbal and dietary supplement induced liver injury: Highlights from the recent literature.

Herbal-induced liver injury (HILI) is an important and increasingly concerning cause of liver toxicity, and this study presents recent updates to the literature. An extensive literature review was conducted encompassing September 2019 through March 2021. Studies with clinically significant findings were analyzed and included in this review. We emphasized those studies that provided a causality assessment methodology, such as Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method scores. Our review includes reports of individual herbals, including Garcinia cambogia, green tea extract, kratom as well as classes such as performance enhancing supplements, Traditional Chinese medicine, Ayurvedic medicine and herbal contamination. Newly described herbals include ashwagandha, boldo, skyfruit, and 'Thermo gun'. Several studies discussing data from national registries, including the United States Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Network, Spanish DILI Registry, and Latin American DILI Network were incorporated. There has also been a continued interest in hepatoprotection, with promising use of herbals to counter hepatotoxicity from anti-tubercular medications. We also elucidated the current legal conversation surrounding use of herbals by presenting updates from the Federal Drug Administration. The highlights of the literature over the past year indicate interest in HILI that will continue as the supplement industry in the United States grows.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights of the Recent Literature.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI), herbal-induced liver injury, and herbal and dietary supplement (HDS)-induced liver injury are an important aspect of drug safety. Knowledge regarding responsible drugs, mechanisms, risk factors, and the diagnostic tools to detect liver injury have continued to grow in the past year. This review highlights what we considered the most significant publications from among more than 1800 articles relating to liver injury from medications, herbal products, and dietary supplements in 2017 and 2018. The US Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study highlighted several areas of ongoing study, including the potential utility of human leukocyte antigens and microRNAs as DILI risk factors and new data on racial differences, the role of alcohol consumption, factors associated with prognosis, and updates on the clinical signatures of autoimmune DILI, thiopurines, and HDS agents. Novel data were also generated from the Spanish and Latin American DILI registries as well as from Chinese and Korean case series. A few new agents causing DILI were added to the growing list in the past 2 years, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, as were new aspects of chemotherapy-associated liver injury. A number of cases reported previously described hepatotoxins confirmed via the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM; e.g., norethisterone, methylprednisolone, glatiramer acetate) and/or the DILIN method (e.g., celecoxib, dimethyl fumarate). Additionally, much work centered on elucidating the pathophysiology of DILI, including the importance of bile salt export pumps and immune-mediated mechanisms. Finally, it must be noted that, while hundreds of new studies described DILI in 2017-2018, the quality of such reports must always be addressed. Björnsson reminds us to remain very critical of the data when addressing the future utility of a study, which is why it is so important to adhere to a standardized method such as RUCAM when determining DILI causality. While drug-induced hepatotoxicity remains a diagnosis of exclusion, the diverse array of publications that appeared in 2017 and 2018 provided important advances in our understanding of DILI, paving the way for our improved ability to make a more definitive diagnosis and risk assessment.

Highlights of drug - and herb- induced liver injury in the literature from 2016: how best to translate new information into clinical practice?

INTRODUCTION: Over 1500 papers on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and herb-induced liver injury (HILI) were published in 2016, many of which have the potential to impact clinical practice. Areas covered: Clinical studies and case series that lent themselves to new concepts in diagnosing, and treating DILI were selected for inclusion. Epidemiology of DILI in large prospective registries was highlighted. Causality assessment of drug hepatotoxicity remains challenging, as seen with cases of OxyELITE Pro (OEP). In 2016 updates to the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) were published to aid in the accuracy of diagnosing DILI/HILI. New reports of established hepatotoxins were again discussed in 2016, including genetic risk factors for DILI with respect to antituberculous agents. Expert opinion: 2016 marked a turning point in how much credence should be placed in the current causality assessment for DILI/HILI cases. Many recognized hepatotoxins are backed by a relatively few number of literature reports. Danan and Teschke make a strong case that an updated RUCAM should remain the gold standard for diagnosing DILI/HILI going forward, although the role of expert opinion is often still needed in cases where RUCAM falls short. The field of chemoinformatics continues to evolve while we await a truly predictive and diagnostic DILI biomarker.

Current and future directions in the treatment and prevention of drug-induced liver injury: a systematic review.

While the pace of discovery of new agents, mechanisms and risk factors involved in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains brisk, advances in the treatment of acute DILI seems slow by comparison. In general, the key to treating suspected DILI is to stop using the drug prior to developing irreversible liver failure. However, predicting when to stop is an inexact science, and commonly used ALT monitoring is an ineffective strategy outside of clinical trials. The only specific antidote for acute DILI remains N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for acetaminophen poisoning, although NAC is proving to be beneficial in some cases of non-acetaminophen DILI in adults. Corticosteroids can be effective for DILI associated with autoimmune or systemic hypersensitivity features. Ursodeoxycholic acid, silymarin and glycyrrhizin have been used to treat DILI for decades, but success remains anecdotal. Bile acid washout regimens using cholestyramine appear to be more evidenced based, in particular for leflunomide toxicity. For drug-induced acute liver failure, the use of liver support systems is still investigational in the United States and emergency liver transplant remains limited by its availability. Primary prevention appears to be the key to avoiding DILI and the need for acute treatment. Pharmacogenomics, including human leukocyte antigen genotyping and the discovery of specific DILI biomarkers offers significant promise for the future. This article describes and summarizes the numerous and diverse treatment and prevention modalities that are currently available to manage DILI.

Drug-induced liver injury: a summary of recent advances.

INTRODUCTION: The knowledge base of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) continues to grow each year as additional drugs are identified as hepatotoxins. There is still a need to improve our ability to predict and diagnose DILI in the preclinical and post-approval settings. AREAS COVERED: This article presents the new and updated DILI registries for 2010, including the latest information on the causes and outcomes of non-acetaminophen DILI cases in the US Acute Liver Failure Study Group database. As DILI is still largely a diagnosis of exclusion, it is appropriate that causality assessment instruments are again the subject of considerable discussion. EXPERT OPINION: DILI research remains extremely active including studies aimed at being better able to identify causative agents, utilize potential biomarkers, predict who is at greatest risk of injury and manage outcomes. With respect to identifying DILI risk factors at the genetic level, the field is rapidly approaching the day where 'personalized medicine' (based on pharmacogenomics) will become a reality. A large single-center series from India reminds us that geography can influence the drugs responsible for liver injury; however, Hy's law remains universal. As our DILI knowledge continues to grow, it remains essential to keep abreast of the important changes reported each year.

Drug-induced liver injury: what was new in 2008?

BACKGROUND: Given the number of publications appearing annually regarding drug-induced liver injury (DILI), there remains a need to concisely summarize each year's new crop of case series and reports as well as the advances in mechanisms of liver injury and in the field of pharmacogenomics relating to DILI. OBJECTIVE: To present an up-to-date review of the past year's most important clinical studies and reports of DILI, placing them into context of previous publications. METHODS: A Medline search was conducted of all manuscripts appearing in the fields "hepatotoxicity" and "drug-induced liver injury" during the calendar year 2008. The most clinically relevant English language case reports and studies exploring mechanisms and risk factors for DILI were then chosen for review, and supplemented with older literature where appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: As in past years, 2008 was replete with publications dealing with virtually all facets of DILI, including updated incidence and prevalence data, as well as the latest information regarding mechanisms of liver injury. Data from the first 300 patients in the National Institute of Health-sponsored DILI Network registry of > 100 non-acetaminophen causes were presented. Antimicrobials and CNS drugs were responsible for > 60% of cases, with herbals and dietary supplements being increasingly reported. Identification of genetic predispositions to DILI is coming of age with the FDA calling for the testing of human leukocyte antigen B(*)5701 before the use of abacavir to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Several groups emphasized the pitfalls in utilizing Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and other causality assessment methodologies, and an updated review appeared on the use of potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease.

Drug-induced liver injury in 2007.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the pertinent literature on the causes, epidemiology, prevalence, clinical features, evaluation and mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury reported during 2007. RECENT FINDINGS: Although the frequency of drug-induced liver injury remains low, new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirm that of the approximately 1600 new acute liver failure cases annually, acetaminophen hepatotoxicity accounts for 41%; among children with acute liver failure, acetaminophen was the second most common cause. Antimicrobials lead the list of non-acetaminophen causes of drug-induced liver injury. In Asia, herbal compounds are the most common causes of the condition. Pravastatin was shown to be safe in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or chronic hepatitis C. The US Food and Drug Administration issued a draft guidance document on the premarketing clinical evaluation and stopping rules of drug-induced liver injury signals, including Hy's Law cases in clinical trials. SUMMARY: The year 2007 brought with it several reminders of the importance of drug-induced liver injury in the clinical trial as well as the clinical practice setting. There is additional evidence that statin drugs may be used safely in patients with chronic liver disease. Comments received by the US Food and Drug Administration to finalize their guidance document are eagerly awaited.

Terbinafine-induced acute autoimmune hepatitis in the setting of hepatitis B virus infection.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of terbinafine-induced autoimmune hepatitis in a patient with chronic hepatitis B infection. CASE SUMMARY: A 57-year-old Taiwanese male with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) began an oral regimen of terbinafine 250 mg once daily for dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis, despite the manufacturer's recommendation not to use the drug in patients with liver dysfunction. The patient's liver enzyme levels were within normal limits at initiation of therapy. Immediately prior to concluding the 12 week treatment course, he became anorexic with malaise and subsequently developed ascites and jaundice. After a visit to an outside emergency department and positively trending liver function test levels, he was referred to our liver clinic. The patient was taking no other medications or herbal supplements, did not drink alcohol, and did not appear to suffer a flare of HBV infection. The diagnosis was supported by the presence of transient autoantibodies and a liver biopsy consistent with acute autoimmune drug injury. Three weeks after terbinafine was discontinued, peak levels of aspartate aminotransferase (1282 IU/L), alanine aminotransferase (1044 IU/L), and bilirubin (5.9 mg/dL) were noted; his platelet level had decreased to 77 x 10(3)/mm3. He was treated with supportive care that included vitamin K for coagulopathy, diuretics for ascites, and adefovir to prevent hepatitis B exacerbation. The patient's liver function studies began to normalize 6 weeks after terbinafine was discontinued. DISCUSSION: Terbinafine-induced hepatobiliary dysfunction, due to hepatocellular injury, cholestasis, or mixed form, has been reported, but this is the first case of autoimmune hepatitis supported by serologic, biochemical, and biopsy results. Use of the Naranjo probability scale revealed a probable relationship between the patient's hepatitis and terbinafine. Furthermore, the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method, a scoring system that specifically assesses the likelihood of drug-induced elevated levels of liver-associated enzymes, also supported a probable relationship. The pathogenesis of most drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis remains speculative, likely involving hapten-carrier complex and the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. In this patient, his chronic HBV carrier state may have predisposed him to this autoimmune reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare practitioners should heed the manufacturer's warning that terbinafine not be used in patients with underlying hepatic disease.

Drug-induced liver disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the pertinent case reports, case series and clinical studies that described clinical, histological, epidemiological and mechanistic features of drug-induced liver disease in 2005. RECENT FINDINGS: Acetaminophen, highly active antiretroviral therapy and drugs for tuberculosis retained their preeminent position as the most commonly reported agents causing drug-induced liver disease, with acetaminophen continuing to be the leading cause of acute liver failure in the USA. While the frequency of drug-induced liver disease remains low, a large case-series of acute drug-induced liver disease from Spain and Sweden supported the observation that acute hepatocellular jaundice from a drug is associated with death or the need for transplant in at least 10% (known as Hy's Law). With respect to using potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease, statins and second-generation thiazolidinediones were shown to be safe when used in patients with elevated baseline alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase levels. SUMMARY: Drug-induced liver disease remains an important cause of acute liver failure, and research efforts by the National Institutes of Health and others are underway to better determine the risk factors and other host susceptibilities that will allow for the safer use of drugs in the future.

Drug-induced liver disease 2004.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the salient reviews, studies and case reports and series that dealt with clinical, pathological, methodological, and epidemiological descriptions of drug-induced liver disease in the calendar year 2004. RECENT FINDINGS: While no new causes of drug-induced liver injury were reported for 2004, several new reports of previously recognized hepatotoxins, including herbal products, were published. These include the antiretroviral drugs for HIV and agents to manage tuberculosis. Acetaminophen (APAP) retained its preeminent position as the leading cause of drug-induced acute liver failure, currently accounting for nearly 50% of cases according to the latest figures from the U.S. Acute Liver Failure Study Group. Not surprisingly, APAP also heads the list of drugs and toxins leading to liver transplantation for acute hepatic failure. Efforts to reduce the number of cases of intentional APAP poisonings by restricting the number of tablets sold at any one time in the UK are ongoing, but the success of the program may be lessening, as was pointed out this year. The use of potentially hepatotoxic medications in patients with underlying liver disease was examined with the statins, and they emerged as a safe class for use in this setting. SUMMARY: Given the apparent increasing incidence of acute liver failure attributable to APAP in the US, additional efforts are still needed to better define the risks associated with its use and to further reduce the incidence of severe liver injury from this widely used agent.