Concurrent HER or PI3K Inhibition Potentiates the Antitumor Effect of the ERK Inhibitor Ulixertinib in Preclinical Pancreatic Cancer Models.

Effective treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an urgent, unmet medical need. Targeting KRAS, the oncogene that is present in >95% of PDAC, is a heavily pursued strategy, but remains unsuccessful in the clinic. Therefore, targeting key effector cascades of KRAS oncoprotein, particularly the mitogenic RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, represents the next best strategy. However, RAF or MEK inhibitors have failed to show clinical efficacy in PDAC. Several studies have shown that cancer cells treated with RAF or MEK inhibitors adopt multiple mechanisms to reactivate ERK signaling. Therefore, development of ERK-specific inhibitors carries the promise to effectively abrogate this pathway. Ulixertinib (or BVD-523) is a first-in-class ERK-specific inhibitor that has demonstrated promising antitumor activity in a phase I clinical trial for advanced solid tumors with NRAS and BRAF mutations, providing a strong rationale to test this inhibitor in PDAC. In this study, we show that ulixertinib effectively inhibits in vitro growth of multiple PDAC lines and potentiates the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine. Moreover, we found that PDAC cells treated with ulixertinib upregulates the parallel PI3K-AKT pathway through activating the HER/ErbB family proteins. Concurrent inhibition of PI3K or HER proteins synergizes with ulixertinib in suppressing PDAC cell growth in vitro and in vivo Overall, our study provides the preclinical rationale for testing combinations of ulixertinib with chemotherapy or PI3K and HER inhibitors in PDAC patients. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(10); 2144-55. ©2018 AACR.

Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) are frequently employed in cancer centers but their value has been debated. We reviewed the decision-making process and resource utilization of our MDTB to assess its utility in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal tract conditions. METHODS: A prospectively-collected database was reviewed over a 12-month period. The primary outcome was change in management plan as a result of case discussion. Secondary outcomes included resources required to hold MDTB, survival, and adherence to treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Four hundred seventy cases were reviewed. MDTB resulted in a change in the proposed plan of management in 101 of 402 evaluable cases (25.1%). New plans favored obtaining additional diagnostic workup. No recorded variables were associated with a change in plan. For newly-diagnosed cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 33), survival time was not impacted by MDTB (p = .154) and adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was 100%. The estimated cost of physician time per case reviewed was $190. CONCLUSIONS: Our MDTB influences treatment decisions in a sizeable number of cases with excellent adherence to national guidelines. However, this requires significant time expenditure and may not impact outcomes. Regular assessments of the effectiveness of MDTBs should be undertaken.