Photo(chemo)therapy in the management of atopic dermatitis: an updated systematic review with implications for practice and research.

BACKGROUND: Photo(chemo)therapy is a common treatment modality in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but evidence on its effectiveness has not been recently systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of treatment with photo(chemo)therapy in patients with AD and to make treatment recommendations on basis of the evidence. METHODS: We performed an electronic literature search in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Global Resource of EczemA Trials (GREAT) and prospective trial registers, complemented with a search of PubMed to find recent studies not yet available in OVID MEDLINE. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on phototherapy for the treatment of AD were considered for data extraction. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included (905 participants). The identified RCTs were generally clinically and qualitatively heterogeneous. Therefore a formal meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusions must be drawn carefully because of small sample sizes, varying study quality and sometimes the absence of direct comparisons, but on the basis of the included evidence, ultraviolet (UV) A1 and narrowband (NB)-UVB appeared the most effective treatment modalities for the reduction of clinical signs and symptoms. No difference between high-dose UVA1 and medium-dose UVA1 was seen. UVAB was shown to be more effective than UVA and broadband-UVB for the improvement of clinical symptoms, but not compared with UVA1. Other effective treatment options include full-spectrum light, psoralen plus UVA and balneophototherapy. No serious side-effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Phototherapy can be a valid therapeutic option for patients with AD. Based on the results of this review, preference is given to UVA1 and NB-UVB. Further well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are required.

Laser and intense pulsed light therapy for the treatment of hypertrophic scars: a systematic review.

Hypertrophic scars are difficult to improve and remain a therapeutic challenge. Several lasers and light sources have been evaluated in the past decades and have been shown to improve hypertrophic scars. However, a systematic review is not available. To assess current evidence of efficacy of all laser and intense pulsed light therapies used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, we performed a systematic review searching electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL. The quality of the controlled clinical trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Thirteen articles involving seven different lasers met the inclusion criteria. Most evidence was found for the pulsed dye laser (PDL) 585 nm (eight studies), followed by the PDL 595 nm (two studies), whereas limited evidence (one trial per laser) was available for the fractional nonablative laser 1540 nm, CO2 laser 10,600 nm, low-level laser therapy, Nd:YAG laser 532 nm and Erbium:YAG laser 2940 nm. Treatment recommendations should be formulated with caution as current evidence is insufficient for comparing the efficacy of different laser therapies. The PDL 585 nm showed a low efficacy for the treatment of hypertrophic scars. With moderate efficacy, the PDL 595 nm is promising, although more research is necessary. Little evidence was found for the efficacy of other lasers. Future research, with a low risk of bias, well-defined scar characteristics, validated outcome measures, standardized measurement methods, follow-up periods of at least 6 months and well-defined laser settings, is needed.