Comparing the effectiveness of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin therapy for elderly Taiwanese stage III colorectal cancer patients based on quality-of-life measures (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38) and a new cost assessment tool.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in developed countries and its incidence increases with age. Intravenous administration of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) has been a standard treatment regime for stage III CRC. However, patients generally prefer oral therapy such as Capecitabine. Studies showed that combination of oxaliplatin and capecitabine demonstrated efficacy and safety on par with treatment involving various 5-FU/LV-based regimens in elderly patients as they are in younger ones. However, little is known regarding the cost of adjuvant therapy or the effect of therapy on HRQoL. Thus the aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of different adjuvant care for stage III CRC on the HRQoL of elderly patients and to compare the economic costs associated with capecitabine-based and 5-FU/LV-based adjuvant treatments from a societal perspective in Taiwan. METHODS: A prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter study involving 123 patients aged 70 and over from 11 different centers was conducted between July 2008 and July 2011 in Taiwan. The adjusted monthly costs per patient and HRQoL were evaluated from individual-level data. The HRQoL of patients was assessed before and after adjuvant treatment. Direct and indirect costs of adjuvant treatment were estimated from a number of sources, and QoL scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: After correcting for baseline characteristics of patients, no significant differences were observed in the global HRQoL scores between treatment groups during the study period. According to QLQ-CR38 results, capecitabine-based therapy appeared to alleviate problems related to defecation (4.54 vs. 8.5; P = 0.011); however, micturition problems increased (9.27 vs. 7.51; P = 0.04), compared with 5-FU/LV-based treatment. The adjusted monthly treatment cost per patient was NT$27,300 for capecitabine-based treatment and NT$53,671 for 5-FU/LV-based treatment. The total cost of 5-FU/LV-based treatment was 59 % greater than that of capecitabine-based treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Analyzing from the societal perspective in Taiwan, capecitabine-based therapy incurred lower treatment costs than 5-FU/LV-based therapy and did not jeopardize HRQoL. Therefore, capecitabine, with or without oxaliplatin, could be considered as an alternative treatment option for elderly patients with stage III CRC.

Health-related quality of life and cost comparison of adjuvant capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in stage III colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs associated with 2 adjuvant chemotherapy regimens [capecitabine-based therapy versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV)-based therapy] in stage III colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter study from July 2008 to July 2011. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 questionnaires was used to assess HRQoL before, during, and after treatment. The direct and indirect costs of adjuvant treatment were estimated from a specially prepared questionnaire, the National Health Insurance Research Database, and other published sources. We used propensity scoring to match samples between groups and performed multivariate analyses to adjust for differences in patient demographics and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 497 patients were enrolled, and 356 completed the surveys. Following propensity score matching, 239 patients were included in the analysis (122 in the capecitabine-based group, 117 in the 5-FU/LV-based group). Global HRQoL scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, compared to patients in the 5-FU/LV-based group, patients in the capecitabine-based group had less nausea and vomiting (mid-term, P = 0.024; final, P = 0.013), appetite loss (mid-term, P < 0.0001; final, P = 0.001), and fewer side effects from chemotherapy (mid-term, P = 0.017). In addition, the monthly cost of capecitabine-based therapy was lower than those of 5-FU/LV-based therapy [NT$31,895.46 (US$1063.18) vs. NT$79,159.24 (US$2638.64) per patient]. CONCLUSIONS: Capecitabine is a reasonable alternative and cost-effective treatment option under current conditions for patients with stage III colorectal cancer.

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant chemotherapy use in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) is debated. We evaluated the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features recommended by most guidelines for identifying high-risk stage II CRC and adjuvant chemotherapeutic response. METHODS: We enrolled 1,039 stage II CRC patients who underwent curative surgery at Taipei Veterans General Hospital from January 2005 to December 2010. Seventy-seven patients who received radiotherapy were excluded. The endpoint was disease-free survival. RESULTS: Of 962 patients, 37 had stage T4 tumors; 50, lymphovascular invasion; 39, poor differentiation; 249, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels >5 ng/mL; and 53 underwent emergent operations. One hundred ninety-four patients received 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. During a median follow-up period of 60.2 months, recurrence developed in 110 patients (11.4 %). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 87.6 %. In multivariate analysis, preoperative CEA >5 ng/ml (p = 0.001), emergent operation for obstruction/perforation (p = 0.008), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.014), and T4 disease (p = 0.030) were significantly associated with poor DFS. High-risk stage II patients (n = 484) benefited from adjuvant chemotherapy (5-year DFS with and without adjuvant chemotherapy, 87.3 vs. 78.9 %; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy improved DFS in high-risk stage II CRC patients, but not in low-risk patients.

Assessment of the value of carcinoembryonic antigen reduction ratio as a prognosis factor in rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most widely used tumor marker for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the role of CEA reduction ratio after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We enrolled 284 patients who underwent preoperative CRT followed by radical surgical resection. Patients were divided into 3 groups: serum CEA levels before CRT (pre-CRT CEA) less than 5 ng/mL (group 1); pre-CRT CEA of 5 ng/mL or more with CEA reduction ratio of 50% or more (group 2); and pre-CRT CEA of 5 ng/mL or more with CEA reduction ratio less than 50% (group 3). RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was not different between groups 1 (71.8%) and 2 (69.4%) but was significantly lower in group 3 (49.5%). CEA group, lymph node status after CRT (ypN) stage, and histologic type were independent prognostic factors for DFS on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: CEA reduction ratio might be an independent prognostic factor for DFS in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative CRT and radical surgery.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by metastasectomy converts to survival benefit in stage IV rectum cancer.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on stage IV rectum cancer. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2011, 297 consecutive patients diagnosed with stage IV rectum cancer (synchronous metastasis) were enrolled. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used for prognostic factors determination, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analyses. Propensity scores with the one-to-one nearest-neighbor matching model were used to select matched patients for validation studies. RESULTS: In total, 63 patients received CCRT and 234 did not. The patients in the CCRT group were younger, had more low-lying lesions, and had more T4 lesions, lung metastases, metastasectomies, and oxaliplatin-based upfront chemotherapy. Before propensity-score matching, a younger age (HR = 0.662, P = 0.016), lower carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (≤20 ng/ml) (HR = 0.531, P = 0.001), no metastasectomy (HR = 3.214, P < 0.001), and no CCRT (HR = 1.844, P = 0.019) were independent prognostic factors after controlling for other confounding factors. After matching, only CEA and metastasectomy, but not CCRT, were independent prognostic factors. The survival benefit of CCRT was restricted to patients who undergo subsequent metastasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Upfront CCRT only provided a survival benefit in patients with stage IV rectum cancer who undergo subsequent metastasectomy.

Adjuvant oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing chemotherapy improves overall survival following resection of metachronous colorectal liver metastases.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant systemic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy improves survival after resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), but not metachronous. We retrospectively examined if adjuvant chemotherapy with new regimen containing oxaliplatin or irinotecan improved survivals after resection of metachronous CLMs. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2007, 52 patients having undertaken resection of metachronous CLMs with curative intent were identified from Taipei Veterans General Hospital hospitalization registry. One patient with perioperative mortality and another being lost to follow-up within 3 months after metastasectomy were excluded. Thirty-one patients experienced six to 12 cycles of FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy while 19 patients with 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)-based chemotherapy following CLM resection. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) and secondary end point, overall survival (OS). RESULTS: By the univariate analysis, median DFS was 34.3 months in the FOLFOX/FOLFIRI group vs 14.2 months in the 5-FU/LV group (P = 0.022). The median OS and 5-year survival rates were longer than 57.7 months (not reached, with median follow-up of 35.5 months) and 54.0%, respectively, in the FOLFOX/FOLFIRI group compared to 49 months and 34.6% in the 5-FU/LV group (P = 0.027). FOLFOX/FOLFIRI chemotherapy was shown by multivariate analyses to be an independent factor predicting a better DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.15-0.94; P = 0.036) and a better OS (HR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.083-0.86, P = 0.026) than 5-FU/LV-based. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant FOLFOX/FOLFIRI chemotherapy following resection of metachronous CLMs is demonstrated to have better DFS and OS than 5-FU/LV chemotherapy.

Anus-preservation treatment for anal cancer: retrospective analysis at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate anus-preservation treatment for anal cancer. METHODS: Review of 42 patients (24 M/18 F; median age, 70 years; range, 13-95) with stage I-IIIB disease (squamous cell carcinoma [SqCC], 33; adenocarcinoma, 9) who received curative radiotherapy between 1991 and 2004. Eleven patients had prior surgical excision. Radiotherapy comprised lower-pelvis irradiation with boost to primary tumor (median lower-pelvis dose, 45 Gy; range, 17.2-59; median primary-site dose, 56 Gy; range, 40-72). Of 31 patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy, 25 received 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin-C. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 32 months. The most common toxicity was dermatological; 25 patients (59%) developed moderate-to-severe wet desquamation. Radiotherapy was interrupted in 18 patients (43%). The complete response rate was 67% (SqCC, 23/33; adenocarcinoma, 5/9); of 12 patients who failed treatment, primary tumor was the recurrent site in seven (median failure time, 5 months): six patients underwent salvage abdominoperineal resection. Three-year overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 53% and 64%. Five-year functional anus-preservation rate was 64%. In multivariate analysis, OS was affected by performance status (P < 0.001), N stage (P = 0.009), and pathological type (P = 0.006). Only N stage (P = 0.001) affected DFS. CONCLUSION: With careful monitoring of toxicity, non-surgical anus-preservation treatment with good tumor control is feasible.

Irinotecan (CPT11) plus high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) as salvage therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) after failed oxaliplatin plus 5-FU and LV: a pilot study in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (CPT11) has established activity against advanced colorectal cancer without cross-resistance with 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin-based therapy. We conducted this pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combination treatment with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for patients in whom combination treatment with oxaliplatin with 5-FU + leucovorin has failed. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in this study after oxaliplatin treatment had failed. The treatment protocol consisted of CPT11 (180 mg/m(2) for 90 min) on day 1 and a 2 h infusion of 200 mg/m(2) leucovorin followed by 400 mg/m(2) 5-FU as an intravenous bolus injection plus a 22 h continuous infusion of 600 mg/m(2) 5-FU. This regimen was repeated for two consecutive days every 2 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were eligible for this study and in total 144 cycles of therapy (median eight cycles) were given to these patients. Four patients (22.2%; 95% CI: 8-36.4%) achieved an objective response of partial remission (PR) and an additional seven obtained stable disease (SD) status or minor response. The median duration of response was 8 months and 14 patients were alive at the end of the study. Hematological toxicity (neutropenia) was the most common serious side effect (29.2%), followed by gastrointestinal effects (diarrhea, 28.5%). Grade II-III diarrhea was experienced for at least one cycle by each patient. CONCLUSIONS: The results of treatment for patients after oxaliplatin failure are encouraging and this treatment protocol is also well tolerated by previously heavily treated patients.