Comparative effectiveness of glycyrrhizic acid preparations aimed at preventing and treating anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury: A network meta-analysis of 97 randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical guidelines and expert consensus do not yet recommend glycyrrhizic acid (GA) preparations, such as compound glycyrrhizin, diammonium glycyrrhizin, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MGIG), et al., for the prevention of anti-tuberculosis(anti-TB) drug-induced liver injury (DILI) due to insufficient evidence. Although these GA preparations are recommended for the treatment of anti-TB DILI, which one performs best is unclear. Previous conventional meta-analyses did not summarize the results of simultaneous comparisons of different glycyrrhizinate preparations. Therefore, we aimed to compare and rank different GA preparations on preventing and treating the anti-TB DILI by network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Chongqing VIP and, the Wanfang Database was performed up to December 19, 2020. The literature was screened according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to extract important information. The outcomes were the incidence of liver injury (prevention section) and treatment response rate (treatment section). The NMA was conducted with a random-effects model under the Bayesian framework to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs) using R software (version 3.6.1). RESULTS: From 1,411 publications, we included 97 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (10,923 participants). In terms of preventing anti-TB DILI (33 RCTs, comprising 5,762 patients), CGC, DGC, DGEC, and DGI, but not CGI, significantly reduced the incidence of liver injury than control group (RRs ranged from 0.26 to 0.58); CGC and DGEC were superior to DGC (RRs = 0.50 and 0.58, respectively). In terms of treating anti-TB DILI (64 RCTs, comprising 5,161 patients), MGIG was most effective among all regimens (RRs ranged from 1.15 to 1.72) while DGC ranked last (RRs ranged from 0.58 to 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: All GA preparations except for CGI were effective in preventing the incidence of anti-TB DILI and CGC was superior to DGC. MGIG seems to be the best choice among all GA preparations for the treatment of anti-TB DILI. Future clinical practice guidelines should factor in these novel findings to improve patient outcomes; however, further high-quality trials are needed to validate these results.

Pharmacogenomics and herb-drug interactions: merge of future and tradition.

The worldwide using of herb products and the increasing potential herb-drug interaction issue has raised enthusiasm on discovering the underlying mechanisms. Previous review indicated that the interactions may be mediated by metabolism enzymes and transporters in pharmacokinetic pathways. On the other hand, an increasing number of studies found that genetic variations showed some influence on herb-drug interaction effects whereas these genetic factors did not draw much attention in history. We highlight that pharmacogenomics may involve the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic pathways to affect herb-drug interaction. We are here to make an updated review focused on some common herb-drug interactions in association with genetic variations, with the aim to help safe use of herbal medicines in different individuals in the clinic.