Metastasis, Mortality, and Quality of Life for Men With NCCN High and Very High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer After Surgical and/or Combined Modality Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) of men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high or very high risk prostate cancer after definitive surgery and/or multimodal radiotherapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied a retrospective cohort study of 586 patients treated between the years 2000 and 2017 receiving radical prostatectomy with or without postoperative RT, external-beam RT (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy (Brachy) boost + ADT. Patient-reported QOL for urinary, bowel, sexual, and overall physical and mental functioning was assessed using the American Urological Association symptom scale, the Sexual Health Inventory in Men, the Rectal-Function Assessment Scale, the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, and the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey. RESULTS: Median follow-up for survival was 5 years. No significant differences between the treatments were observed for overall survival or metastasis-free survival at the P < .05 threshold. The propensity-adjusted 5-year metastasis-free survival estimates for EBRT + ADT, EBRT + Brachy + ADT, and surgery were 74.6%, 94.8%, and 83.1%, respectively. The EBRT + Brachy + ADT and surgery cohorts had significantly worse mean American Urological Association symptom scores at 6 months than the EBRT + ADT cohort, which resolved by 1 year. Surgical patients had better rectal function scores than EBRT + ADT patients at years 1 to 3, but similar function thereafter. Adjuvant or salvage RT resulted in significant declines in various Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary, sexual, and bowel domains, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical but not mental domains. CONCLUSION: Men with very and/or high-risk localized prostate cancer are likely to require multimodal therapy. The overall differences in survival and long-term QOL are similar for men choosing surgical versus RT pathways.

A prospective, multicenter study of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) utilization during definitive radiation for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Although complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) utilization in breast cancer patients is reported to be high, there are few data on CAM practices in breast patients specifically during radiation. This prospective, multi-institutional study was conducted to define CAM utilization in breast cancer during definitive radiation. MATERIALS/METHODS: A validated CAM instrument with a self-skin assessment was administered to 360 Stage 0-III breast cancer patients from 5 centers during the last week of radiation. All data were analyzed to detect significant differences between users/nonusers. RESULTS: CAM usage was reported in 54% of the study cohort (n=194/360). Of CAM users, 71% reported activity-based CAM (eg, Reiki, meditation), 26% topical CAM, and 45% oral CAM. Only 16% received advice/counseling from naturopathic/homeopathic/medical professionals before initiating CAM. CAM use significantly correlated with higher education level (P<.001), inversely correlated with concomitant hormone/radiation therapy use (P=.010), with a trend toward greater use in younger patients (P=.066). On multivariate analysis, level of education (OR: 6.821, 95% CI: 2.307-20.168, P<.001) and hormones/radiation therapy (OR: 0.573, 95% CI: 0.347-0.949, P=.031) independently predicted for CAM use. Significantly lower skin toxicity scores were reported in CAM users vs nonusers, respectively (mild: 34% vs 25%, severe: 17% vs 29%, P=.017). CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study to assess CAM practices in breast patients during radiation, with definition of these practices as the first step for future investigation of CAM/radiation interactions. These results should alert radiation oncologists that a large percentage of breast cancer patients use CAM during radiation without disclosure or consideration for potential interactions, and should encourage increased awareness, communication, and documentation of CAM practices in patients undergoing radiation treatment for breast cancer.

Administration of high-dose macrophage colony-stimulating factor increases bone turnover and trabecular volume fraction.

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a hematopoietic growth factor that plays a critical role in early osteoclastogenesis. To characterize the skeletal effects of M-CSF, we administered soluble M-CSF to mice. It was hypothesized that M-CSF would stimulate bone formation through coupled activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. Twenty-four male C57BL/6 J mice (n = 12/group, aged 7 weeks) received subcutaneous injections of human M-CSF [5 mg/(kg day)] or inert vehicle (VEH) for 21 days. M-CSF increased serum bone turnover markers (+57% TRAP-5b and +44% osteocalcin). Microcomputed tomography revealed an anabolic effect on tibial trabecular bone, with higher bone volume fraction (+35%), connectivity density (+79%), and number (+18%), as well as lower trabecular separation (-18%). M-CSF had no significant effect on cortical bone mineral content, geometry, or strength. There was no change in quantitative histomorphometry parameters of femoral cortical bone. These results reveal the complex, site-specific effects of M-CSF. In particular, we have demonstrated an anabolic effect of M-CSF on trabecular bone achieved through coupled activation of osteoblasts. However, in contrast to previous studies, M-CSF was found to have no effect on cortical bone. M-CSF was demonstrated to significantly influence both bone modeling and remodeling in relatively young animals.