Impact of biological gender and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulation on renal recovery after relief of unilateral ureteral obstruction.

PURPOSE: Gender difference and nitric oxide deficiency contribute to the progression of many chronic kidney diseases. In a model of unilateral ureteral obstruction relief we analyzed the impact of biological gender and nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate signaling stimulation on renal disease severity and restoration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female and male rats underwent sham surgery or unilateral ureteral obstruction. After 5-day unilateral ureteral obstruction female and male rats were assigned to obstruction relief alone or obstruction relief plus 7-day treatment with the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator BAY 41-8543. RESULTS: Compared to male rats with obstruction relief renal disease was less severe in female rats, which had significantly less tubulointerstitial matrix accumulation and tubular atrophy. In each gender group α1 and ß1-soluble guanylate cyclase was comparably and significantly increased but female rats produced significantly more cyclic guanosine monophosphate after treatment with the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator. In each group BAY 41-8543 treatment was associated with significant amelioration of renal matrix protein expansion, macrophage infiltration, tubular apoptosis and atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is protective for unilateral ureteral obstruction relief. This was linked to higher sensitivity of the soluble guanylate cyclase enzyme and cyclic guanosine monophosphate production in response to BAY 41-8543. In these female and male rats enhancing the signaling of nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate with BAY 41-8543 significantly accelerated the restoration of renal architecture after obstruction relief and largely ameliorated the differences in disease severity due to the gender disparity.

Rosuvastatin is additive to high-dose candesartan in slowing progression of experimental mesangioproliferative glomerulosclerosis.

Rosuvastatin is additive to high-dose candesartan in slowing progression of experimental mesangioproliferative glomerulosclerosis (GS). Progressive mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis, mostly IgA nephropathy, is a major cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. In a chronic-progressive model of mesangioproliferative GS, we tested the renoprotective efficacy of rosuvastatin alone and in combination with a high-dose of the AT(1) blocker candesartan. Treatment was started 1 wk after disease induction (anti-thy1 antibody injection into uninephrectomized rats) and continued until week 20. Tubulointerstitial expression of the key fibrosis mediator transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta served as the main marker of disease progression. Compared with the untreated GS rats (475 +/- 52 pg/ml), tubulointerstitial TGF-beta(1) protein expression was significantly reduced by both single therapies (rosuvastatin -47%, candesartan -51%, P < 0.01). Tubulointerstitial matrix accumulation (matrix score in GS: 64 +/- 7%) was relatively reduced by -45 and -52%, respectively (P < 0.01). The combination of rosuvastatin and candesartan had significantly greater effects on tubulointerstitial TGF-beta(1) expression (-82% vs. GS) and matrix accumulation (-83% vs. GS) (P < 0.001 vs. GS, P < 0.05 vs. single therapy) than either drug alone. Similar additive beneficial effects were observed for renal fibronectin and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 expression, cell proliferation, macrophage infiltration, proteinuria, and kidney function. In conclusion, rosuvastatin limits the progressive course of anti-thy1-induced GS toward chronic tubulointerstitial fibrosis and renal insufficiency to a degree comparable to the one achieved by a high dose of the AT(1) antagonist candesartan. Combined treatment yields significantly greater actions on renal TGF-beta overexpression and matrix accumulation, cell proliferation, and macrophage infiltration. The results suggest that rosuvastatin and an AT(1) blocker independently interfere with separate key pathways involved in the progression of chronic mesangioproliferative GS.

Mycophenolate mofetil slows progression in anti-thy1-induced chronic renal fibrosis but is not additive to a high dose of enalapril.

Tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis are hallmarks of chronic progressive renal diseases. To characterize the functional interaction between cell infiltration and matrix expansion, this study compared the immunosuppressant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), intended as primarily anti-inflammatory intervention, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril, intended as primarily an anti-fibrotic drug, and a combination of both as anticipated anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic intervention. The model used was anti-thy1-induced chronic-progressive glomerulosclerosis (cGS) in the rat, where a brief anti-thy1-induced glomerular injury progresses spontaneously toward tubulointerstitial fibrosis and renal insufficiency. cGS was induced by injection of anti-thy1 antibody into uninephrectomized Wistar rats. One week after disease induction, animals were randomly assigned to the following groups: cGS, cGS plus MMF (20 mg.kg body wt(-1).day(-1)), cGS plus high-dose enalapril (12 mg.kg body wt(-1).day(-1)), and cGS plus both. At week 16 after disease induction, MMF or enalapril alone reduced signs of chronic renal disease significantly and similarly compared with the untreated cGS group. Variables measured included proteinuria, blood pressure, tubulointerstitial and glomerular matrix accumulation, expression of transforming growth factor-beta(1), fibronectin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, infiltration of lymphocytes and macrophages, plasma creatinine and urea levels, and glomerular filtration rate. Combined MMF and enalapril treatment was not superior to single therapy. In conclusion, MMF slows the progression of chronic renal fibrosis and renal insufficiency as effectively as high-dose enalapril in the anti-thy1-induced chronic-progressive glomerulosclerosis model. The dual anti-inflammatory/anti-fibrotic intervention does not yield additive renoprotective effects, indicating that MMF and enalapril interfere with similar or very closely related pathways involved in progression of renal disease.