Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 58(6): 106450, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34644604

RESUMO

Few studies have assessed the clinical and bacterial characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteraemic pneumonia (BP) episodes. This study analysed all non-duplicate PA-BP episodes from a tertiary hospital in 2013-2017. Epidemiology, clinical data, antimicrobial therapy and outcomes were recorded. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on PA blood isolates. The impact on early and late overall mortality of host, antimicrobial treatment and pathogen factors was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of 55 PA-BP episodes, 32 (58.2%) were caused by extensively drug-resistant (XDR) PA. ST175 (32.7%) and ST235 (25.5%) were the most frequent high-risk clones. ß-Lactamases/carbapenemases were detected in 29 isolates, including blaVIM-2 (27.2%) and blaGES type (25.5%) [blaGES-5 (20.0%), blaGES-1 (3.6%) and blaGES-20 (1.8%)]. The most prevalent O-antigen serotypes were O4 (34.5%) and O11 (30.9%). Overall, an extensive virulome was identified in all isolates. Early mortality (56.4%) was independently associated with severe neutropenia (aOR = 4.64, 95% CI 1.11-19.33; P = 0.035) and inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy (aOR = 5.71, 95% CI 1.41-22.98; P = 0.014). Additionally, late mortality (67.3%) was influenced by septic shock (aOR = 8.85, 95% CI 2.00-39.16; P = 0.004) and XDR phenotype (aOR = 5.46, 95% CI 1.25-23.85; P = 0.024). Moreover, specific genetic backgrounds [ST235, blaGES, gyrA (T83I), parC (S87L), exoU and O11 serotype] showed significant differences in patient outcomes. Our results confirm the high mortality associated with PA-BP. Besides relevant clinical characteristics and inappropriate empirical therapy, bacteria-specific genetics factors, such as XDR phenotype, adversely affect the outcome of PA-BP.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/mortalidade , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/mortalidade , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/genética , Feminino , Genoma Bacteriano/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epidemiologia Molecular , Antígenos O/genética , Pneumonia Bacteriana/microbiologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/mortalidade , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/genética , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , beta-Lactamases/genética
2.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1145: 181-195, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31364079

RESUMO

Biofilm is an adaptive bacterial strategy whereby microorganisms become encased in a complex glycoproteic matrix. The low concentration of oxygen and nutrients in this environment leads to heterogeneous phenotypic changes in the bacteria, with antimicrobial tolerance being of paramount importance. As with other antibiotics, the activity of colistin is impaired by biofilm-embedded bacteria. Therefore, the recommendation for administering high doses in combination with a second drug, indicated for planktonic infections, remains valid in this setting. Notably, colistin has activity against metabolically inactive biofilm-embedded cells located in the inner layers of the biofilm structure. This is opposite and complementary to the activity of other antimicrobials that are able to kill metabolically active cells in the outer layers of the biofilm. Several experimental models have shown a higher activity of colistin when used in combination with other agents, and have reported that this can avoid the emergence of colistin-resistant subpopulations. Most experience of colistin in biofilm-associated infections comes from patients with cystic fibrosis, where the use of nebulized colistin allows high concentrations to reach the site of the infection. However, limited clinical experience is available in other scenarios, such as osteoarticular infections or device-related central nervous system infections caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms. In the latter scenario, the use of intraventricular or intrathecal colistin also permits high local concentrations and good clinical results. Overall, the efficacy of intravenous colistin seems to be poor, but its association with a second antimicrobial significantly increases the response rate. Given its activity against inner bioflm-embedded cells, its possible role in combination with other antibiotics, beyond last-line therapy situations, should be further explored.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Biofilmes/efeitos dos fármacos , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Doenças Ósseas Infecciosas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções do Sistema Nervoso Central/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana
4.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 625.e1-625.e23, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937457

RESUMO

Both bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. The prognosis may darken not infrequently, especially in the presence of intracardiac devices or methicillin-resistance. Indeed, the optimization of the antimicrobial therapy is a key step in the outcome of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates has led to the research of novel therapeutic schemes. Specifically, the interest raised in recent years on the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been also extended to infections caused by susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. Recent clinical and experimental research has focused in the activity of new combinations of antimicrobials, their indication and role still being debatable. Also, the impact of an appropriate empirical antimicrobial treatment has acquired relevance in recent years. Finally, it is noteworthy the impact of the implementation of a systematic bundle of measures for improving the outcome. The aim of this clinical guideline is to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment and prognosis of bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by S. aureus, in accordance to the latest evidence published.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Vigilância da População , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Padrão de Cuidado , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin ; 33(9): 626-32, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25937456

RESUMO

Bacteremia and infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common and severe diseases. Optimization of treatment is fundamental in the prognosis of these infections. The high rates of treatment failure and the increasing interest in the influence of vancomycin susceptibility in the outcome of infections caused by both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates have led to research on novel therapeutic schemes. The interest in the new antimicrobials with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci has been extended to susceptible strains, which still carry the most important burden of infection. New combinations of antimicrobials have been investigated in experimental and clinical studies, but their role is still being debated. Also, the appropriateness of the initial empirical therapy has acquired relevance in recent years. The aim of this guideline is to update the 2009 guidelines and to provide an ensemble of recommendations in order to improve the treatment of staphylococcal bacteremia and infective endocarditis, in accordance with the latest published evidence.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Endocardite Bacteriana/cirurgia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Vigilância da População , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz , Padrão de Cuidado , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico por imagem
6.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 80(1): 66-71, 2014 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24996840

RESUMO

We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of high doses of daptomycin (10 mg/kg/d) plus rifampin (D10 + R) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This was an observational retrospective multicenter study (2010-2012) including all patients with acute PJI by fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci managed with implant retention and D10 + R. Twenty cases were included: 2 (10%) were withdrawn due to toxicity, leaving 18 cases for efficacy evaluation: 13 (72%) women, age 79 years (range 58-90). Clinical failure was observed in 9 (50%) patients: in 5 cases, staphylococci were recovered (28% of microbiological failures); no modification of daptomycin-MIC was observed. These 18 cases were compared with 44 matched historical cases: failure rate was similar, but whereas in the historical series, failure occurred fundamentally during therapy, in the present series, it was recorded after discontinuation of antibiotics. In summary, D10 + R may be the initial treatment of choice for PJI by fluoroquinolone-resistant staphylococci managed with implant retention.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Daptomicina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 76(1): 93-8, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23541692

RESUMO

Linezolid may be an interesting alternative for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) due to its bioavailability and its antimicrobial spectrum. However, experience in this setting is scarce. The aim of the study was to assess linezolid's clinical and microbiological efficacy, and also its tolerance. This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-comparative study of 25 patients with late-chronic PJI caused by Gram-positive bacteria managed with a two-step exchange procedure plus 6 weeks of linezolid. Twenty-two (88%) patients tolerated linezolid without major adverse effects, although a global decrease in the platelet count was observed. Three patients were withdrawn because of major toxicity, which reversed after linezolid stoppage. Among patients who completed treatment, 19 (86%) demonstrated clinical and microbiological cure. Two patients presented with clinical and microbiological failure, and one showed clinical cure and microbiological failure. In conclusion, linezolid showed good results in chronic PJI managed with a two-step exchange procedure. Tolerance seems acceptable, though close surveillance is required.


Assuntos
Acetamidas/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Artrite/microbiologia , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/isolamento & purificação , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Acetamidas/farmacocinética , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Artrite/cirurgia , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Positivas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Linezolida , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxazolidinonas/farmacocinética , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA