Outcomes of children with constipation and autism spectrum disorder treated with antegrade continence enemas.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of functional constipation (FC) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is challenging due to sensory and behavioral issues. We aimed to understand whether antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) are successful in the treatment of FC in children with ASD. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed in children diagnosed with ASD and FC who underwent appendicostomy or cecostomy placement from 2007 to 2019. Descriptive statistics regarding soiling and complications were calculated. RESULTS: There were 33 patients included, with a median age of 9.7 years at the time of ACE initiation. The average intelligence quotient was 63.6 (SD = 18.0, n = 12), the average behavioral adaptive score was 59.9 (SD = 11.1, n = 13), and the average total Child Behavioral Checklist score was 72.5 (SD = 7.1, n = 10). Soiling rates were significantly lower following ACE initiation (42.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.04). Behavioral issues only prevented 1 patient (3.0%) from proper ACE use. Eleven patients (36.6%) were able to transition to laxatives. There were significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes measures and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Placement of an appendicostomy or cecostomy for management of FC in children with severe ASD was successful in treating constipation and improving quality of life.

Antegrade continence enemas in children with functional constipation and dyssynergic defecation: Go or no go?

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of children with functional constipation after antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) and determine if pre operative anorectal manometry (AMAN) findings, including dyssynergic defecation, are associated with outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with functional constipation who received a Malone appendicostomy or cecostomy after failed medical management was conducted. Patients were included if they had AMAN data prior to their operation. Patients that underwent colonic resection were excluded. Demographics, clinical characteristics, manometry results, and post ACE outcomes were obtained. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were identified with median age at ACE of 8.9 years (IQR: 7.2-12.6) and median follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR: 1.8-3.2 years). Twenty patients (51%) were female and most (35, 92%) were White. All patients had severe constipation prior to ACE and 59% had fecal incontinence. Thirty-four patients (87%) received a Malone and 5 (13%) received a cecostomy. Post ACE, 35 (90%) were clean with daily flushes and 6 (15%) eventually successfully transitioned to laxatives only. Awake AMAN and balloon expulsion test were performed in 15 patients, with 14 (93%) displaying evidence of dyssynergic defecation. Twelve of 14 of patients (86%) with dyssynergia were clean with ACE at follow-up. because of the majority of patients being clean post ACE, there was limited power to detect predictors of poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs are successful treatment options for patients with severe constipation and fecal incontinence, including those with dyssynergic defecation. Larger studies are needed to identify factors predictive of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.