Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 38(1): 11-6, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25616201

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To document the efficacy of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) followed by adjuvant chemoradiation in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 148 patients with pT4N0/T1-4N+ rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Seventy-seven patients received total mesorectal excision surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiation alone, 71 patients received total mesorectal excision surgery followed by IORT (range, 10 to 20 Gy) and adjuvant chemoradiation. RESULTS: The 5-year local control (LC) and disease-free survival were 79.2% versus 89.7% (P=0.032), 58.5% versus 69.0% (P=0.049) for external-beam radiation (EBRT) and IORT+EBRT groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that adjuvant IORT has a trend toward improvement of LC (P=0.079); 5 (3%) patients (EBRT n=2; IORT n=3) experienced incomplete intestinal obstruction and 3 patients had chronic diarrhea. There was no clinically relevant neuropathy or sacral osteoradionecrosis. Hydronephrosis occurred in 13 patients (EBRT n=8; IORT+EBRT n=5), 8 of whom had documented concomitant disease recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, higher radiation dose may contribute to the improvement of both LC and disease-free survival, without significantly increasing the incidence of acute and long-term complications compared with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias Retais/terapia , Reto/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Organoplatínicos/administração & dosagem , Oxaliplatina , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Retais/patologia
2.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 35(5): 474-9, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21577086

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy of high-dose radiation therapy (RT) to the primary and regional disease in combination with systemic chemotherapy and local treatment to metastatic foci in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: One hundred and five consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed NPC with distant metastasis at diagnosis seen between 1995 and 2002 were reviewed. All were offered cisplatin-based chemotherapy, high-dose RT (>30 Gy) to the head and neck region, and active treatment to the metastatic foci. RESULTS: Patients' median age was 46 years, and all had a Karnofsky Performance Score of ≥70. Eighty-nine patients (85%) had metastases confined to 1 organ. Ninety-six patients (91%) received at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy and 71 (68%) received greater than 65 Gy of radiation to the head and neck region. With a median follow-up time of 22 months (range: 2 to 142 mo), 90 patients had deceased, and the median survival time of the entire group was 25 months. The 2 and 5-year estimated overall survival rates were 50% and 17%, respectively. Radiation dose of greater than 65 Gy to the primary region (P = 0.05) and number of organs with metastases (single vs. multiple) (P = 0.002) were independent predictive factors for overall survival on log-rank tests. Only moderately severe acute toxicities, such as Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 mucositis, skin desquamation, and leukocytopenia were observed. No patient experienced grade 4 acute toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose RT is indicated for local disease control in patients with metastatic NPC, and may improve survival when actively used with systemic chemotherapy and local treatment for metastatic foci. Patients with single-organ metastases have a better prognosis as compared with those with more widespread metastases.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimiorradioterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/patologia , Gradação de Tumores , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 102(1): 51-5, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22178689

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To document the long-term efficacy of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) followed by concurrent chemotherapy and external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the management of locally advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 97 consecutive patients with T3/4 or N+ gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Fifty-one patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (EBRT group) and 46 received IOERT (dose range, 12-15 Gy) followed by chemoradiotherapy (EBRT+IOERT group). RESULTS: The 5-year locoregional control rates were 50% and 35% in the two groups with or without IOERT, respectively (p=0.04). Two patients had recurrence within the IOERT field in the EBRT+IOERT group and 14 patients recurred in the same area in the EBRT group (p=0.02). Multivariate analyses revealed that adjuvant IOERT was an independent prognosticator for both local-regional control (p=0.02) and disease-free survival (p=0.05). G3/4 late toxicity was observed in 5 patients in the EBRT+IOERT group, but none in the EBRT group (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Higher radiation dose may contribute to the improvement of local control, especially in the field encompassed by IOERT. The addition of IOERT to surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation deserves further investigation in a randomized trial.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Gastrectomia/métodos , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Prognóstico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
BMC Cancer ; 9: 249, 2009 Jul 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19622166

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effects of sorafenib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been confirmed in an international collaborative phase III trial. This study aims to confirm similar efficacy and treatment-induced toxicities of sorafenib in the treatment of metastatic RCC in ethnic Chinese patients. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive and non-selected patients with pathologically confirmed metastatic RCC were treated according to an institutional treatment protocol. All patients were treated with 400 mg of sorafenib orally twice daily on a continuous basis until disease progression or intolerance to treatment occurred. Dose reduction to 400 mg once daily was required if grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurred. All patients except for 7 received nephrectomy in the course of their disease. All patients were assessed for tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-induced toxicities. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 76 weeks (range 2-296 weeks) for the entire group of patients. Radiologically confirmed complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) of more than 4 months, and disease progression as best objective responses were observed in 1 (1%), 23 (23.5%), 62 (63.3%), and 12 (12.2%) patients, respectively. The tumor control rate (CR+PR+SD of >4 months) was 87.8%. The 1-year estimated PFS and OS were 58.4% and 64.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 60 weeks (95% CI 41-79); and the median overall survival (OS) time was not reached with a follow-up of 76 weeks. Reduction of sorafenib dose was required in 26 patients who developed grade 3 or 4 treatment-cause adverse-effects. An additional 9 patients discontinued sorafenib treatment due to severe adverse-effects. No grade 5 toxicity occurred.Multivariate analysis revealed that independent predictive factors for tumor response to sorafenib treatment included ECOG status, presence of lymph node metastasis, and nephrectomy prior to the development of metastasis. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib produced an 87.8% disease control rate for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chinese patients, with acceptable rates of toxicity. The medication dosed at 400 mg twice daily is both efficacious and safe in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chinese patients.


Assuntos
Benzenossulfonatos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/metabolismo , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/metabolismo , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , China , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Metástase Neoplásica , Nefrectomia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia , Sorafenibe , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Cancer J ; 14(4): 269-75, 2008.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18677137

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Intergroup 0116 (INT-0116) established adjuvant chemoradiation as the standard of care for resected high-risk adenocarcinoma of the stomach in the United States. However, adjuvant chemoradiation remains controversial in many parts of Asia and Europe, where patients tend to undergo a more thorough D2 dissection. In INT-0116, 90% of patients had a limited or inadequate node dissection (D0 or D1). Also, 17% of patients in the chemoradiation arm had to discontinue treatment because of toxicities. The objectives of this retrospective study are to report the clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients who were mostly treated with a D2 node dissection and received adjuvant chemoradiation as per INT-0116, and the toxicities of chemoradiation in the context of more aggressive surgery. METHODS: After the results of INT-0116 became apparent, we adopted an institutional policy whereby patients who would otherwise fit the inclusion criteria of INT-0116 received adjuvant chemoradiation. Between March 1999 and November 2004, 70 consecutive patients with pathologic stage T3, T4, or node-positive disease were treated according to the chemoradiation arm of INT-0116. Patients received intravenous 5-fluorouracil 425 mg/m and leucovorin 20 mg/m in cycles 1, 3, and 4. Concurrent chemoradiation was given in cycle 2 and consisted of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin and radiotherapy (45 Gy over 25 fractions in 5 weeks). All patients were operated on by dedicated Japan-trained Surgical Oncologists. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients (96%) had a D2 nodal dissection. Sixty-five patients (93%) had negative pathologic margins (R0 resection) and 5 (7%) had microscopically involved margins (R1 resection). The median follow-up was 27 months (range, 10.1-60.3). The 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control were 60.6%, 54.1%, and 84.3%, respectively. Of the 30 patients who relapsed, 5 (17%) had isolated locoregional recurrences only. The National Cancer Institute--Common Terminology Criteria version 3.0 acute grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal and hematological toxicity rates were 15.7% and 4.3%, respectively. Toxicities led to chemotherapy dose-reductions in 18 patients and dose-delay in 19 patients. Including chemotherapy dose-reductions and delays, 66 patients (94%) completed the entire chemoradiation regimen. There were no toxicity-related deaths. CONCLUSION: In our cohort of 70 patients who had a more thorough D2 node dissection, adjuvant chemoradiation was well tolerated with acceptable toxicities and reasonable tumor control.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Gastrectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Leucovorina/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Complexo Vitamínico B/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
6.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 27(5): 449-51, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15596908

RESUMO

The purpose of this report is to review the complications related to different methods of anesthesia for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma. All patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1999 and 2002 treated with 3-channel HDR brachytherapy were entered. Complications due to anesthesia for each fraction of brachytherapy were graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria. Eighty-four fractions of brachytherapy were delivered to 18 patients: 19 fractions with patients under general anesthesia (GA), 41 with patients under topical anesthesia and sedation, 5 with patients under paracervical nerve block, and 19 with patients under conscious sedation. Thirteen complications were reported: 12 related to GA and 1 due to paracervical nerve block. Of complications due to GA, 7 were grade 1 and 5 were grade 2. The complication due to paracervical nerve block (seizure) was grade 3. GA had significantly more complications than topical anesthesia or conscious sedation (both P < 0.001). HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer under GA has significantly more complications than other methods. Given the increasing use of fractionated 3-channel brachytherapy, further investigation of risks and benefits of anesthetic techniques is required.


Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/efeitos adversos , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Feminino , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos
7.
Am J Clin Oncol ; 27(2): 132-5, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15057151

RESUMO

The local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after conventional radiotherapy has historically been suboptimal. Recently, investigators have reported improved outcomes for this patient population with the use of combined chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this analysis of our prospective treatment protocol was to evaluate the additional value of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRIB) on the disease response, local control, and survival. Between March 1999 and January 2001, 16 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (stage III and IV) nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated prospectively at the Radiation Oncology Department of the National University Hospital of Singapore. All patients were staged according to the AJCC (1997) Staging System and had early T stages (T1 and T2). Treatments included concurrent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy as follows: 66 Gy to the primary tumor in conventional fractionation with cisplatin based concurrent chemotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. Ten Gy of HDRIB in 2 weekly fractions were delivered after the completion of EBRT to all 16 patients. All patients were evaluable for treatment response, local control, survival, and toxicity analysis. The median follow-up for the whole group of patients was 18 months (range: 10-34 months). All patients obtained pathologic complete response at the primary site at 4 months after the completion of the treatment. At the time of this analysis, 15 (93.8%) patients are alive with no evidence of disease. One patient (6.2%) developed locoregional recurrence in the neck at 9 months, and distant metastasis at 11 months after the completion of treatment. Our experience has shown adjuvant HDRIB after concurrent chemoradiation offers encouraging disease response, local control, and survival. A prospective study is being planned to further evaluate the role of adjuvant HDRIB after concurrent chemoradiation on treatment outcome.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Nasofaríngeas/tratamento farmacológico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA