Iron chelation therapy.

Iron overload is a pathological condition resulting from a congenital impairment of its regulation, increased intestinal iron absorption secondary to bone marrow erythroid hyperplasia, or a chronic transfusional regimen. In normal conditions, intracellular and systemic mechanisms contribute to maintaining iron balance. When this complex homeostatic mechanism fails, an iron overload could be present. Detecting an iron overload is not easy. The gold standard remains the liver biopsy, even if it is invasive and dangerous. Identifying iron using noninvasive techniques allowed a better understanding of the rate of iron overload in different organs, with a low risk for the patient. Estimating serum ferritin (mg/L) is the easiest and, consequently, the most employed diagnostic tool for assessing body iron stores, even if it could be a not specific method. The most common hematological causes of iron overload are myelodysplastic syndromes, sickle cell disease, and thalassemia. In all of these conditions, three drugs have been approved for the treatment of iron overload: deferiprone, deferoxamine, and deferasirox. These chelators have been demonstrated to help lower tissue iron levels and prevent iron overload complications, improving event-free survival (EFS). Nowadays, the decision to start chelation and which chelator to choose remains the joint decision of the clinician and patient.

Epigenetic regulation in myelodysplastic syndromes: implications for therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis and dysplasia in one or more lineages, produce life-threatening cytopenias and progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Growing evidence suggests that targeting epigenetic mechanisms improves MDS/AML pathophysiology. AREAS COVERED: This review provides an understanding of studies investigating novel agents published up to January 2011 aimed at normalizing and monitoring the epigenetic profile of the MDS cancer cell. The authors discuss how non-intensive epigenetic therapy can 're-programme' gene expression patterns of abnormal hematopoiesis in MDS. Recently FDA-approved DNA-methyltransferase inhibitors, 5-azacytidine and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine or decitabine, represent frontline nonablative treatments, while combinations with histone deacetylase inhibitors show promising synergism in preclinical and Phase I/II trials in tumor suppressor gene re-expression and overall survival. Additional epigenetic mechanisms including non-encoding transcripts with inhibitory posttranscriptional regulatory functions, such as microRNAs, though not fully understood, present novel molecular and clinical implications in these disorders. EXPERT OPINION: Alongside current single-agent epigenetic regimens, combination therapies represent potentially effective options for intermediate-2 and high-risk MDS. Methylation profiles and gene mutation predictors provide promising areas of development for monitoring MDS disease progression and outcome, while targeting microRNA dysregulation represents an important therapeutic goal.

Janus kinase 2 inhibitors in myeloproliferative disorders.

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD: JAK2 is an obligatory kinase for the proliferation and differentiation of erythroid cells and megakaryocytes thus representing a relevant therapeutic target for agents that specifically inhibit its activity particularly in myeloproliferative disorders (MPD) harboring JAK2(V617F) mutations. AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW: We discuss the physiopathology of the JAK2 signaling pathway and review clinical trials of JAK2 inhibitors for the treatment of MPD using papers and meeting abstracts published up to September 2010. WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN: This review helps in understanding the potential role of JAK2 inhibitors in MPD clinical trials and provides a comprehensive review regarding their efficacy and safety in these disorders. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: JAK2 inhibitors may prove to be useful only for suppressing disease manifestations. However, unlike drugs such as IFN which are capable of eliminating the malignant clone, JAK2 inhibitors are unable to eradicate the disease. In fact, results to date indicate that although these inhibitors reduce splenomegaly and alleviate constitutional symptoms irrespective of JAK2 mutational status, most have only a modest impact on the JAK2(V617F) allele burden. Considering the relevant risk of serious complications in patients undergoing splenectomy, these drugs could find a suitable indication in patients with myelofibrosis awaiting bone marrow transplantation.