[Process of medical nutrition therapy]. / Proceso de tratamiento médico nutricional.

Introduction: Medical nutrition therapy is a very useful tool in maintaining and recovering the health of patients with disease-related malnutrition, although its implementation can be complex and is not without risks. Quality processes are understood as sets of activities that are related or interact to transform input elements into results. From the SENPE Management Work Group we present the process of medical nutrition therapy (PMNT), which aims to facilitate the management of clinical nutrition of a multidisciplinary nutrition support team in a hospital setting. This paper describes the seven sub-processes PMNT is comprised of, in addition to a previous nutritional screening sub-process. Each sub-process is divided into a first section with a technical sheet detailing its general aspects, while a second section proposes key objectives, quality indicators, and standards for their evaluation. .

Introducción: El tratamiento médico nutricional es de gran utilidad en el mantenimiento y recuperación de la salud de los pacientes con desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad, aunque su implementación puede ser compleja y no está exenta de riesgos. Se entiende por proceso aquel conjunto de actividades que están mutuamente relacionadas o que interactúan para transformar elementos de entrada en resultados. Desde el Grupo de Trabajo de Gestión de la SENPE presentamos el Proceso de Tratamiento Médico Nutricional (PTMN), que tiene por objetivo facilitar la gestión de la nutrición clínica, pensando en un equipo de soporte nutricional multidisciplinar de atención al paciente hospitalizado. En este documento se describen los siete subprocesos que constituyen el PTMN, además de un subproceso previo de cribado nutricional. Cada subproceso se divide en una primera sección con una ficha técnica en la que se detallan sus aspectos generales, mientras que en la segunda sección se proponen objetivos clave, indicadores de calidad y estándares para su evaluación.

Multidisciplinary consensus on nutritional and metabolic therapy in enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery programs: NutRICA Project.

BACKGROUND: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care pathways include evidence-based items designed to accelerate recovery after surgery. Interdisciplinarity is one of the key points of ERAS programs. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a consensus document among the members of the Nutrition Area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Group for Multimodal Rehabilitation (GERM), in which the goal is to homogenize the nutritional and metabolic management of patients included in an ERAS program. METHODS: 69 specialists in Endocrinology and Nutrition and 85 members of the GERM participated in the project. After a literature review, 79 statements were proposed, divided into 5 sections: 17 of general characteristics, 28 referring to the preoperative period, 4 to the intraoperative, 13 to the perioperative and 17 to the postoperative period. The degree of consensus was determined through a Delphi process of 2 circulations that was ratified by a consistency analysis. RESULTS: Overall, in 61 of the 79 statements there was a consistent agreement, with the degree of consensus being greater among members of the SEEN (64/79) than members of the GERM (59/79). Within the 18 statements where a consistent agreement was not reached, we should highlight some important nutritional strategies such as muscle mass assessment, the start of early oral feeding or pharmaconutrition. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached on the vast majority of the nutritional measures and care included in ERAS programs. Due to the lack of agreement on certain key points, it is necessary to continue working closely with both societies to improve the recovery of the surgical patients.

Multidisciplinary consensus on nutritional and metabolic therapy in enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery programs: NutRICA Project. / Consenso multidisciplinar sobre la terapia nutricional y metabólica en los programas de recuperación intensificada en cirugía abdominal: Proyecto NutRICA.

BACKGROUND: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) care pathways include evidence-based items designed to accelerate recovery after surgery. Interdisciplinarity is one of the key points of ERAS programs. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a consensus document among the members of the Nutrition Area of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Group for Multimodal Rehabilitation (GERM), in which the goal is to homogenize the nutritional and metabolic management of patients included in an ERAS program. METHODS: 69 specialists in Endocrinology and Nutrition and 85 members of the GERM participated in the project. After a literature review, 79 statements were proposed, divided into 5 sections: 17 of general characteristics, 28 referring to the preoperative period, 4 to the intraoperative, 13 to the perioperative and 17 to the postoperative period. The degree of consensus was determined through a Delphi process of 2 circulations that was ratified by a consistency analysis. RESULTS: Overall, in 61 of the 79 statements there was a consistent agreement, with the degree of consensus being greater among members of the SEEN (64/79) than members of the GERM (59/79). Within the 18 statements where a consistent agreement was not reached, we should highlight some important nutritional strategies such as muscle mass assessment, the start of early oral feeding or pharmaconutrition. CONCLUSION: Consensus was reached on the vast majority of the nutritional measures and care included in ERAS programs. Due to the lack of agreement on certain key points, it is necessary to continue working closely with both societies to improve the recovery of the surgical patients.

[COVID pandemic and clinical nutrition response in Spain: results of a national survey]. / Pandemia de COVID y respuesta de la nutrición clínica en España: resultados de una encuesta nacional.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction: the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced major organizational and care changes in the health system. However, in Spain, the circumstances suffered by the health professionals who have cared for pandemic patients from a clinical nutrition standpoint has remained unknown up to this moment. Objectives: the management and care changes made in clinical nutrition units in Spain, and their impact on clinical practice are described. Material and methods: a cross-sectional study was carried out using a survey directed at SENPE members (June 2020). Responses sent by health professionals in the field of clinical nutrition who had treated patients with COVID-19 in Spanish hospitals were included in the study. Resultados: a total of 116 survey forms were analyzed, mostly filled out by doctors (57.8 %) working at hospitals with more than 500 beds (56 %); 46 % of survey respondents were on telework. There was a nutritional care plan in 68 % of cases, such plan being present mainly in hospitals with more than 500 beds (p < 0.001). In these hospitals more specific diets for COVID-19 were implemented than in those under 500 beds: 18 (35.3 %) vs 44 (67.7 %), (p < 0.001). The use of recommendations issued by scientific societies was reported in 86 % of cases. Never or almost never could a satisfactory nutritional assessment be performed for 38.8 %. The prescription of nutritional supplements was not less than 50 %. Health workers rated their performance as satisfactory or very satisfactory (51.7 %), and this was not related to hospital size but to having implemented a COVID-19 diet (p < 0.05). Conclusions: clinical nutrition in Spain has responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with organizational and managerial changes and, although care has been clearly affected, some quality standards were ultimately maintained. Larger hospitals have had some advantages in making these adjustments.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: la pandemia ocasionada por el SARS-CoV-2 ha obligado a realizar importantes cambios organizativos y asistenciales en el sistema sanitario. Sin embargo, hasta ahora se desconoce cuáles han sido las circunstancias que han sufrido los profesionales sanitarios que han atendido esta pandemia desde los servicios de nutrición clínica en España. Objetivos: describir los cambios de gestión y asistenciales realizados en las unidades de nutrición clínica en España y su repercusión en la práctica clínica. Material y métodos: estudio transversal mediante técnica de encuesta dirigida a socios de la SENPE (junio 2020). Se incluyen en el estudio respuestas remitidas por profesionales sanitarios del ámbito de la nutrición clínica que atendieron a pacientes con COVID-19 en hospitales españoles. Resultados: se analizan 116 encuestas provenientes en su mayoría de médicos (57,8 %) y de hospitales de más de 500 camas (56 %); el 46 % de los encuestados teletrabajó. Se contó con la presencia de un plan de atención nutricional en el 68 % de los casos, plan que fue mayoritario en los hospitales con más de 500 camas (p < 0,001). En estos hospitales se implantaron más dietas específicas para COVID-19 que en los menores de 500 camas: 18 (35,3 %) vs. 44 (67,7 %), (p < 0,001). El uso de las recomendaciones de las sociedades científicas se notificó en el 86 % de los casos. El 38,8 % nunca o casi nunca pudieron hacer una valoración nutricional satisfactoria. La prescripción de suplementos nutricionales fue no inferior al 50 %. El 51,7 % de los encuestados calificaron su actuación como satisfactoria o muy satisfactoria, y esta no se relacionó con el tamaño de hospital pero sí con haber implantado una dieta para la COVID-19 (p < 0,05). Conclusiones: la nutrición clínica en España ha respondido a la pandemia de COVID-19 con cambios organizativos y de gestión y, aunque la asistencia se ha visto claramente afectada, se han podido mantener algunos estándares de calidad. Los hospitales de mayor tamaño han tenido cierta ventaja para realizar estos ajustes.

Fish Oil Enriched Intravenous Lipid Emulsions Reduce Triglyceride Levels in Non-Critically Ill Patients with TPN and Type 2 Diabetes. A Post-Hoc Analysis of the INSUPAR Study.

There are no studies that have specifically assessed the role of intravenous lipid emulsions (ILE) enriched with fish oil in people with diabetes receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The objective of this study was to assess the metabolic control (glycemic and lipid) and in-hospital complications that occurred in non-critically ill inpatients with TPN and type 2 diabetes with regard to the use of fish oil emulsions compared with other ILEs. We performed a post-hoc analysis of the Insulin in Parenteral Nutrition (INSUPAR) trial that included patients who started with TPN for any cause and that would predictably continue with TPN for at least five days. The study included 161 patients who started with TPN for any cause. There were 80 patients (49.7%) on fish oil enriched ILEs and 81 patients (50.3%) on other ILEs. We found significant decreases in triglyceride levels in the fish oil group compared to the other patients. We did not find any differences in glucose metabolic control: mean capillary glucose, glycemic variability, and insulin dose, except in the number of mild hypoglycemic events that was significantly higher in the fish oil group. We did not observe any differences in other metabolic, liver or infectious complications, in-hospital length of stay or mortality.

Soporte nutricional y nutrición parenteral en el paciente oncológico: informe de consenso de un grupo de expertos / Nutritional support and parenteral nutrition in cancer patients: An expert consensus report

La desnutrición es un problema médico frecuente de los pacientes oncológicos que impacta de forma negativa en la calidad de vida. El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar y dar respuesta a diferentes cuestiones relacionadas con el manejo nutricional de un paciente oncológico en la práctica clínica. Un grupo multidisciplinar de expertos en Oncología Médica, Endocrinología y Nutrición y Farmacia elaboró una lista de temas relacionados con el estado nutricional del paciente oncológico agrupados en 3 bloques: soporte nutricional, nutrición parenteral (NP) y NP domiciliaria (NPD). Se realizó una revisión de la literatura que incluyó artículos publicados en español, inglés y francés hasta abril de 2017. Este consenso destaca diferentes elementos clave que ayudarán a los médicos a normalizar el manejo del estado nutricional del paciente oncológico en la práctica clínica, estableciendo pautas comunes de indicación, monitorización, requerimientos nutricionales y vías de acceso a la NP

Malnutrition is a common medical problem in cancer patients with a negative impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to address different issues related to nutritional management of cancer patients in clinical practice. A multidisciplinary group of experts in Medical Oncology, Pharmacy, and Endocrinology and Nutrition prepared a list of topics related to the nutritional status of cancer patients and grouped them into three blocks: nutritional support, parenteral nutrition (PN), and home PN (HPN). A literature review was made of articles published in Spanish, English and French until April 2017. This consensus emphasizes several key elements that help physicians standardize management of the nutritional status of cancer patients in clinical practice, and establishes common guidelines for indication, monitoring, nutritional requirements, and access routes to PN

Terms, concepts and definitions in clinical artificial nutrition. The ConT-SEEN Project. / Términos, conceptos y definiciones en nutrición clínica artificial. Proyecto ConT-SEEN.

BACKGROUND: Imprecision in terms used in the field of clinical nutrition may lead to misinterpretations among professionals. OBJECTIVE: For this reason, the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) promoted this document on the terms and definitions used in clinical artificial nutrition (enteral and parenteral), establishing an agreement between Spanish experts of this specialty. METHODS: Forty-seven specialists in endocrinology and nutrition, members of the Nutrition Area of the SEEN, participated between April and September 2016. After a systematic literature review, 52 concepts were proposed. The coordinators included two additional concepts, and 57were finally selected by the working group: 13 of a general nature, 30 referring to enteral nutrition and 14 to parenteral nutrition. The degree of agreement was subsequently determined using a two-round Delphi process. It was finally ratified by consistency and concordance analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-four of the 57 terms had a very consistent agreement and were concordant. Only three showed no concordance, of whom two were very consistent and one inconsistent. In conclusion, there was consensus in the definition of 54 basic terms in the practice of clinical nutrition.

Organization and management of clinical nutrition in Spain. How do we assess the quality of our activities?

INTRODUCTION: Among the objectives of the SENPE Management Working Group is the development of knowledge and tools related to the evaluation of health outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To obtain an approximate profile of clinical nutrition in hospitals in Spain, specifically concerning its organization, endowment, activities and quality indicators. METHODS: A cross-sectional study conducted in 2013 through a structured survey sent to a random sample of 20% of hospitals from the network of the National Health System of Spain, stratified by the number of hospital beds. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 67% (83% in hospitals with over 200 beds). In 65% of hospitals, clinical nutrition is run by a coordinated team or unit, with a doctor working full time in only 50% of centers. Other professionals are often not recognized as part of the team or unit. There is a specialized monographic nutrition clinic in 62% of centers and 72% have more than 40 new inpatient consultations per month (27% with more than 80 per month). Among the centers with a clinical nutrition team or unit, there is a greater tendency to monitor quality indicators related to clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is widespread addition of clinical nutrition teams and units in hospitals in Spain. However, truly multidisciplinary organization is not often found. High workloads are assumed in relation to staffing levels. The existence of well-organized structures may be associated with benefits that directly affect attendance.

Beneficios del soporte nutricional especializado precoz en pacientes con criterios de desnutrición / Benefits of early specialized nutritional support in malnourished patients

Introducción y objetivo. La desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad (DRE) presenta una prevalencia del 23% en el medio hospitalario español y se asocia a complicaciones clínicas. El soporte nutricional especializado (SNE) puede reducir estas complicaciones. Material y métodos. Estudio prospectivo en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual que compara la reducción de la estancia y las complicaciones en pacientes con NRS-2002≥3 puntos que recibieron SNE durante los 5 primeros días de ingreso (precoz) o posteriormente. Resultados. El grupo con SNE precoz presentó una estancia media 8,83 días inferior al grupo con introducción tardía (IC 95% 3,55-14,10), si bien este grupo mostró un predominio de pacientes varones y con enfermedad oncológica que pudo influir en los resultados. Se describió una tendencia no estadísticamente significativa a la reducción de la mortalidad y las complicaciones totales. Conclusión. La introducción precoz (primeros 5 días) del SNE en DRE se asoció a una reducción del 32,4% de la estancia (AU)

Introduction and objective. Disease related malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent in Spain, affecting 23% of in-hospital patients, and is associated with clinical complications. Specialized nutritional support (SNS) can reduce these complications. Material and methods. Prospective study carried out in standard clinical practice conditions to test if SNS during the first 5 days of hospitalization, or subsequently, was associated to a lower length of stay or reduced complications in patients with a NRS-2002 score≥3 points. Results. In the group of patients who initiated early SNS, the length of stay was 8.83 days shorter than in the group with a later introduction (95% CI 3.55-14.10); nevertheless, the higher prevalence of male and oncological patients in this group could have impacted the results. A tendency towards a statistically significant lower mortality rate and a reduced amount of total complications was described. Conclusion. The early introduction of SNS (within the first 5 days of hospitalization) in patients with DRM was associated with a 32.4% reduction in the length of stay (AU)

Diferencias en estándares de calidad a la hora de pautar un soporte nutricional: diferencias entre médicos especialistas y no especialistas / Differences in quality standars when prescribing nutritional support: Differences between specialist and non-specialist physicians

Un adecuado plan de soporte nutricional conlleva numerosos aspectos, si bien, la falta de adecuado conocimiento en nutrición clínica de los trabajadores sanitarios en general hace que su prescripción no sea adecuada. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de concordancia comparando soportes nutricionales enterales y parenterales en un mismo individuo con una misma situación de estrés por parte de médicos especialistas en endocrinología y nutrición y médicos no especialistas. Resultados: Los datos antropométricos fueron registrados en un 13,3% de los pacientes por médicos no especialistas, que no realizaron ningún tipo de valoración del estado nutricional previo al inicio del soporte nutricional. El aporte proteico de médicos no especialistas fue inferior a lo estimado según ESPEN (10,29 g de nitrógeno vs 14,62; p < 0,001), no así en el caso de médicos especialistas (14,88 g de nitrógeno; p = 0,072). Los aportes calóricos y de glutamina pautados por especialistas se asemejaron más a lo establecido en las guías de forma estadísticamente significativa, al igual que los controles analíticos realizados. Conclusión: Los soportes nutricionales pautados por los médicos especialistas en endocrinología y nutrición en el Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara se asemejan más a los estándares de las guías de práctica clínica, y son superiores en cuanto a estándares de calidad y cuidado adecuado de los pacientes respecto a los pautados por los médicos no especialistas (AU)

Adequate nutritional support includes many different aspects, but poor understanding of clinical nutrition by health care professionales often results in an inadequate prescription. Material and methods: A study was conducted to compare enteral and parenteral nutritional support plans prescribed by specialist and non-specialist physicians. Results: Non-specialist physicians recorded anthropometric data from only 13.3% of patients, and none of them performed nutritional assessments. Protein amounts provided by non-specialist physicians were lower than estimated based on ESPEN (10.29 g of nitrogen vs 14.62; P < .001). Differences were not statistically significant in the specialist group (14.88 g of nitrogen; P = .072). Calorie and glutamine provision and laboratory controls prescribed by specialists were significantly closer to those recommended by clinical guidelines. Conclusion: Nutritional support prescribed by specialists in endocrinology and nutrition at San Pedro de Alcántara Hospital was closer to clinical practice guideline standards and of higher quality as compared to that prescribed by non-specialists (AU)

Efficiency, cost-effectiveness and need of inversion in nutritional therapy. Importance of detecting and documenting undernutrition.

Disease Related Malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent in Spanish hospitals. WHO estimates that 20-40% of health-associated expenses are lost due to inefficiency. Demonstration that DRM is a component of inefficiency and hiring a specialist physician for its detection and treatment is cost-effective. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison between nutritional diagnosis and procedures detected and encoded at discharge using McNemar test. Recoding of 162 discharge reports including nutritional diagnoses and procedures. Determine changes on Case-Mix Index (IC), cost of procedure and cost procedure/DRG index. Comparison using T-student paired test. RESULTS: Only 10 of 162 diagnoses of malnutrition were coded in delivery statements (p < 0.001). After right codification, IC increased in 103,3 DRG points (p < 0.001). Consequently, procedure cost/DRG index was reduced in 978.81 € (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DRM is underdiagnosed in our hospital. DRM and nutritional procedures detection by a doctor specialist in clinical nutrition led to a reduction in cost procedure/DRG index of 16.8% of officially established by the Health System. Loss of 16.8% of health expenses, estimated in 424.785,15 € was described. Proper codification would have justified 343.291,2 € reimbursement just for nutritional diagnoses and processes. Both expenses were lost due to system's inefficiency. Those amounts are much higher than cost associated of hiring a specialist in clinical nutrition.

[HOME AND AMBULATORY ARTIFICIAL NUTRITION (NADYA) GROUP REPORT, HOME PARENTERAL NUTRITION IN SPAIN, 2014]. / NUTRICIÓN PARENTERAL DOMICILIARIA EN ESPAÑA DURANTE 2014; INFORME DEL GRUPO DE NUTRICIÓN ARTIFICIAL DOMICILIARIA Y AMBULATORIA NADYA.

AIM: to communicate the results of the Spanish Home Parenteral Nutrition (HEN) registry of the NADYASENPE group for the year 2014. MATERIAL AND METHODS: data was recorded online by NADYA group collaborators that were responsible of the HPN follow-up from 1st January to 31st December 2014. RESULTS: a total of 220 patients and 229 episodes of HPN were registered from 37 hospitals that represents a rate of 4.7 patients/million habitants/year 2014. The most frequent disease in adults was other diseases (23.3%), neoplasm (20.4%) followed by radical active neoplasm (11.8%) and mesenteric ischemia (10.9%). The most frequent diagnosis for children were the congenital intestinal disorders (33.3%) followed by traumatic short bowel and other diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: the number of participating centers and registered patients increased progressively respect to preceding years. We consider that the HPN should be regulated by the Sanitary Administration within the framework of the National Health Service Interregional Council. And its inclusion in the portfolio of health services of the different Autonomous Comunities would be beneficial for patients and professionals.

Objetivo: comunicar los datos del registro de Nutrición Parenteral Domiciliaria (NPD) del grupo de trabajo NADYA-SENPE del año 2014. Material y métodos: recopilación de los datos de NPD del registro "on-line" del grupo de Nutrición Artificial Domiciliaria y Ambulatoria (NADYA) desde el 1 de enero de 2014 al 31 de diciembre de 2014. Resultados: se registraron 220 pacientes, con 229 episodios de NPD, procedentes de 37 hospitales; lo que representa una tasa de 4,73 pacientes/millón de habitantes/ año 2014. Las patologías más frecuentes en los adultos fueron: 'otros diagnósticos' (22,3%), la neoplasia paliativa (20,4%), seguida por la neoplasia activa radical (11,8%) y la isquemia mesentérica (10,9%). En los niños las patologías más frecuentes fueron: 'alteraciones congénitas intestinales' (33,3%), seguidas por 'intestino corto traumático' y 'otro diagnóstico'. Conclusiones: se observa un aumento del número de pacientes que reciben nutrición parenteral domiciliaria y de los centros colaboradores. Consideramos que la NPD debería ser regulada por la Administración Sanitaria en el marco del Consejo Interterritorial del Sistema Nacional de Salud, y que su inclusión en la Cartera de Servicios de los diferentes Servicios de Salud de las diferentes comunidades autónomas redundaría en un beneficio para el paciente y los profesionales.

Eficiencia, coste-efectividad y justificación de necesidad de inversión en terapia nutricional en un hospital de nivel III; papel conjunto del médico especialista en endocrinología y nutrición y la unidad de codificación / Efficiency, cost-effectiveness and justification of need for investment in nutrition therapy in a hospital of third level; the role of specialists in endocrinology and nutrition and the coding unit

La desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad (DRE) es una entidad con alta prevalencia en el medio hospitalario español. Según la OMS, entre el 20 y el 40% del gasto sanitario se pierde por ineficiencia. Demostrar que la DRE es una fuente de ineficiencia y que la contratación de un médico especialista para su detección y tratamiento es coste-efectiva para el sistema. Material y métodos: Comparación de diagnósticos y procedimientos nutricionales detectados y codificados en informes de alta mediante test de McNemar. Recodificación de 55 informes de alta incluyendo diagnósticos y procesos nutricionales. Determinar variaciones en IC, coste proceso, coste proceso/punto GRD tras la recodificación. Comparación con test de Wilcoxon. Resultados: Sólo se codificaron 2 de 55 casos de desnutrición (p<0,001) Tras recodificación el IC aumentó 42,67 puntos (p<0,05), lo que se tradujo en disminución del índice coste proceso/punto GRD en 976,81€ (p<0,05). Conclusiones: La DRE no se detecta adecuadamente en el centro. Su detección y la de los procedimientos nutricionales adecuados en manos de un médico especialista en nutrición produjeron una disminución del índice coste proceso/punto GRD de un 20% respecto al coste oficial del sistema. Se produjo una pérdida de un 20% del gasto sanitario, estimado en 172.690€ exclusivamente por procesos nutricionales. Su adecuada codificación justificaría un reembolso de 154.581€ para la asistencia nutricional. Ambos costes, perdidos por ineficiencia, son superiores a los que implica la contratación de un especialista en endocrinología, por lo que no existe justificación económica para su no contratación (AU)

Disease Related Malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent in Spanish hospitals. WHO estimates that 20-40% of health-associated expenses are lost due to inefficiency. Demonstration that DRM is a component of inefficiency and hiring a specialist physician for its detection and treatment is cost-effective. Material and methods: Comparison between nutritional diagnosis and procedures detected and encoded at discharge using McNemar test. Recoding of 55 discharge reports including nutritional diagnoses and procedures. Determine changes on Case-Mix Index (IC), cost of procedure and cost procedure/GRD index. Comparison using Wilcoxon test. Results: Only 2 of 55 diagnoses of malnutrition were coded in delivery statements (p<0,001) After right codification, IC increased in 42,67 GRD points (p<0,05), Consequently, procedure cost/GRD index was reduced in 976,81€ (p<0,05). Conclusions: DRM is underdiagnosed in our hospital. DRM and nutritional procedures detection by a specialist on endocrinology and nutrition led to a reduction in cost procedure/GRD index of 20% of officially established by the Health System. Loss of 20% of health expenses, estimated in 172690€ was described. Proper codification would have justified 154581€ reimbursement just for nutritional diagnoses and processes. Both expenses were lost due to system’s inefficiency. Those amounts are much higher than cost associated of hiring a specialist, so there is no economic reason for denying it (AU)

[Efficiency, cost-effectiveness and justification of need for investment in nutrition therapy in a hospital of third level; the role of specialists in endocrinology and nutrition and the coding unit]. / Eficiencia, coste-efectividad y justificación de necesidad de inversión en terapia nutricional en un hospital de nivel III; papel conjunto del médico especialista en endocrinología y nutrición y la unidad de codificación.

Disease Related Malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent in Spanish hospitals. WHO estimates that 20-40% of health-associated expenses are lost due to inefficiency. Demonstration that DRM is a component of inefficiency and hiring a specialist physician for its detection and treatment is cost-effective. MATHERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison between nutritional diagnosis and procedures detected and encoded at discharge using McNemar test. Recoding of 55 discharge reports including nutritional diagnoses and procedures. Determine changes on Case-Mix Index (IC), cost of procedure and cost procedure/GRD index. Comparison using Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Only 2 of 55 diagnoses of malnutrition were coded in delivery statements (p<0,001). After right codification,IC increased in 42,67 GRD points (p<0,05). Consequently, procedure cost/GRD index was reduced in 976,81€ (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONS: DRM is underdiagnosed in our hospital. DRM and nutritional procedures detection by a specialist on endocrinology and nutrition led to a reduction in cost procedure/GRD index of 20% of officially established by the Health System. Loss of 20% of health expenses,estimated in 172690€ was described. Proper codification would have justified 154581€ reimbursement just for nutritional diagnoses and processes. Both expenses were lost due to system's inefficiency. Those amounts are much higher than cost associated of hiring a specialist, so there is no economic reason for denying it.

La desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad (DRE) es una entidad con alta prevalencia en el medio hospitalario español. Según la OMS, entre el 20 y el 40% del gasto sanitario se pierde por ineficiencia. Demostrar que la DRE es una fuente de ineficiencia y que la contratación de un médico especialista para su detección y tratamiento es coste-efectiva para el sistema. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Comparación de diagnósticos y procedimientos nutricionales detectados y codificados en informes de alta mediante test de McNemar. Recodificación de 55 informes de alta incluyendo diagnósticos y procesos nutricionales. Determinar variaciones en IC, coste proceso, coste proceso/punto GRD tras la recodificación. Comparación con test de Wilcoxon. RESULTADOS: Sólo se codificaron 2 de 55 casos de desnutrición (p<0,001). Tras recodificación el IC aumentó 42,67 puntos (p<0,05), lo que se tradujo en disminución del índice coste proceso/punto GRD en 976,81 € (p<0,05). CONCLUSIONES: La DRE no se detecta adecuadamente en el centro. Su detección y la de los procedimientos nutricionales adecuados en manos de un médico especialista en nutrición produjeron una disminución del índice coste proceso/punto GRD de un 20% respecto al coste oficial del sistema. Se produjo una pérdida de un 20% del gasto sanitario, estimado en 172.690 € exclusivamente por procesos nutricionales. Su adecuada codificación justificaría un reembolso de 154.581€ para la asistencia nutricional. Ambos costes, perdidos por ineficiencia, son superiores a los que implica la contratación de un especialista en endocrinología, por lo que no existe justificación económica para su no contratación.