Alteration in auditory function during the ovarian cycle.

This study investigates whether physiological variations in ovarian hormones during the ovarian cycle (OC) are associated with changes in auditory function. Sixteen women with normal hearing underwent auditory tests and simultaneous measurements of the hormone levels four times during OC. The auditory tests included recording of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), the medial olivocochlear (MOC) suppression and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The OC was defined by oestradiol and progesterone serum levels and menstrual cycle dating. A significant spontaneous OAE frequency shift [F(3,114.6)=15.8, p<0.001], with the greatest shift in the late follicular phase (highest oestrogen levels), was observed. Transient evoked OAE levels showed a consistent tendency in an increase in all frequency bands in the late follicular/early luteal stage and a decrease in the late follicular stage; TEOAE inter-session comparison indicated very small statistical differences. The MOC suppression changed significantly during OC [F(3,33.8)=3.2, p=0.036], with significant inter-session difference, lower in session 2 than in session 1 (p=0.019) and lower in session 4 than in session 1 (p=0.007). The ABR wave V absolute latency changed significantly during OC [F(3,33)=3.3, p=0.03], longer in the late follicular phase. There was also a significant positive correlation of TEOAEs and ABR (wave V latency and III-V interval) and significant negative correlation of MOC suppression with oestradiol levels in the follicular phase. The results of this study reflect very small changes in auditory function during OC, and they are suggestive of an increased hearing sensitivity around the time of ovulation.

Computer-based auditory training (CBAT): benefits for children with language- and reading-related learning difficulties.

This article reviews the evidence for computer-based auditory training (CBAT) in children with language, reading, and related learning difficulties, and evaluates the extent it can benefit children with auditory processing disorder (APD). Searches were confined to studies published between 2000 and 2008, and they are rated according to the level of evidence hierarchy proposed by the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) in 2004. We identified 16 studies of two commercially available CBAT programs (13 studies of Fast ForWord (FFW) and three studies of Earobics) and five further outcome studies of other non-speech and simple speech sounds training, available for children with language, learning, and reading difficulties. The results suggest that, apart from the phonological awareness skills, the FFW and Earobics programs seem to have little effect on the language, spelling, and reading skills of children. Non-speech and simple speech sounds training may be effective in improving children's reading skills, but only if it is delivered by an audio-visual method. There is some initial evidence to suggest that CBAT may be of benefit for children with APD. Further research is necessary, however, to substantiate these preliminary findings.