Study protocol: phase II study to evaluate the effect of cetuximab monotherapy after immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Background: Immunotherapy with programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy, is the standard first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (R/M HNSCC). Unfortunately, there is no established second-line treatment for the many patients who fail immunotherapy. Cetuximab is the only targeted therapy approved in HNSCC but historically has a low response rate of 13%. Objectives: We hypothesize that cetuximab monotherapy following an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) will lead to increased efficacy due to a potential synergistic effect on the antitumor immune response, as a result of activation effects of both treatments on innate and adaptative immune responses. To the authors' knowledge, this is the only ongoing prospective clinical study that evaluates the combination of cetuximab and ICIs administered sequentially. Methods and analysis: In this non-randomized, open-label, phase II trial, 30 patients with R/M HNSCC who have previously failed or could not tolerate a PD-1 inhibitor as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy will subsequently be treated with cetuximab monotherapy. Outcomes of interest include overall response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and treatment toxicity, as well as treatment outcome measured by a patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Saliva and blood will be collected for correlative studies to investigate the immune response status at the end of therapy with an ICI and the effect of cetuximab on the antitumor immune response. The results will be correlated with the response to cetuximab and the time window between the last administration of an ICI and the loading dose of cetuximab. The clinical study is actively recruiting. Ethics: This study was approved by the Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center Institutional Review Board: IRB00065239. Clinical trial registration: This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04375384.

Team-Based Hospice Referrals: A Potential Quality Metric for Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can lead to durable responses in patients with lung cancer but may delay transitions to hospice at the end of life (EOL). We aimed to test the association of continuity of care with EOL outcomes in the ICI era. METHODS: We collected retrospective data on all patients with lung cancer who started ICI treatment at a single comprehensive cancer center in the United States (1/1/14-5/1/18) and subsequently died. We defined a hospice referral as having continuity of care if placed by a provider from the patient's multidisciplinary cancer team (e.g., a medical oncologist, palliative care specialist, intensivist, and hospitalist). RESULTS: In this cohort of 143 patients, 58% had a team-based hospice referral which was associated with a lower risk of death in the hospital. The most common reason patients declined hospice at EOL was an unwillingness to discontinue cancer-directed therapy. As compared to a similar historical cohort of patients treated with chemotherapy alone (2008-2010), there was a similar rate of hospice referral (68% vs 74%) but higher rates of new systemic therapy initiated within 30 days of death (17% vs 6%, p .001) and last dose within 14 days of death (13% vs 5%, p .005). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should test the continuity of care at EOL as a new quality metric for advanced NSCLC.

SMARCA4 mutations in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma: a multi-cohort analysis.

KRAS is a key oncogenic driver in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). Chromatin-remodeling gene SMARCA4 is comutated with KRAS in LUAD; however, the impact of SMARCA4 mutations on clinical outcome has not been adequately established. This study sought to shed light on the clinical significance of SMARCA4 mutations in LUAD. The association of SMARCA4 mutations with survival outcomes was interrogated in four independent cohorts totaling 564 patients: KRAS-mutant patients with LUAD who received nonimmunotherapy treatment from (a) The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and (b) the MSK-IMPACT Clinical Sequencing (MSK-CT) cohorts; and KRAS-mutant patients with LUAD who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy treatment from (c) the MSK-IMPACT (MSK-IO) and (d) the Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center (WFBCCC) immunotherapy cohorts. Of the patients receiving nonimmunotherapy treatment, in the TCGA cohort (n = 155), KRAS-mutant patients harboring SMARCA4 mutations (KS) showed poorer clinical outcome [P = 6e-04 for disease-free survival (DFS) and 0.031 for overall survival (OS), respectively], compared to KRAS-TP53 comutant (KP) and KRAS-only mutant (K) patients; in the MSK-CT cohort (n = 314), KS patients also exhibited shorter OS than KP (P = 0.03) or K (P = 0.022) patients. Of patients receiving immunotherapy, KS patients consistently exhibited the shortest progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.0091) in the MSK-IO (n = 77), and the shortest PFS (P = 0.0026) and OS (P = 0.0014) in the WFBCCC (n = 18) cohorts, respectively. Therefore, mutations of SMARCA4 represent a genetic factor leading to adverse clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma treated by either nonimmunotherapy or immunotherapy.