RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In addition to the prevention of tobacco consumption, the establishment and assurance of high-quality treatment for harmful use and dependence on tobacco products remains an important health-related task in Germany. Regular updating of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) S3 guideline "Smoking and Tobacco Dependence: Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment" (Tobacco Guideline) offers a sustainable and reputable source of knowledge on smoking cessation. METHODS: Under the auspices of the German Society for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Neurology (DGPPN) and the German Society for Addiction Research and Addiction Therapy (DG-Sucht), the Tobacco Guideline was revised in 2019-2020 by 63 experts, who were involved in the development process of the text, in 11 working groups. Undue influence of conflicts of interest on the guideline could be minimized through careful conflict of interest management. Delegates from 50 professional societies discussed the 80 guideline recommendations and voted online. RESULTS: In addition to recommendations for screening and diagnostics, the Tobacco Guideline takes a positive stance towards the use of low-threshold counseling and support services. If, due to the severity of the tobacco-related disorder, brief counseling, telephone counseling, or internet- or smartphone-based methods are not sufficiently effective, individual or group behavioral therapy, possibly in combination with medication, is indicated. If nicotine replacement therapy is not effective, varenicline or bupropion should be offered. Alternative strategies with a lower level of recommendation are hypnotherapy, mindfulness-based treatments, or medication with cytisine. In adolescents and pregnant women, the use of medication should be limited to well-specified exceptions and nicotine replacement. The mean agreement with the recommendations reached a value of 98%. A general overview of the treatment recommendations of the Tobacco Guideline is provided by three clinical algorithms.
Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Tabagismo , Adolescente , Alcoolismo/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Fumar , Dispositivos para o Abandono do Uso de Tabaco , Tabagismo/diagnóstico , Tabagismo/terapia , VareniclinaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Patients seeking treatment for their asthma are most likely motivated by a change in their experience of symptoms, but primary complaints are not always related to the pulmonary system. This study aimed to determine the frequency of such extrapulmonary symptoms in asthma outpatients and their association with psychopathology and asthma outcomes. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized data collected as part of a nationwide, clinical-epidemiological study. The final sample of 572 asthma patients represented all levels of asthma control and severity. Information on demographics and respiratory function was obtained from physicians' documentation. Symptoms were explored using a standardized checklist. RESULTS: Primary symptoms reported by asthma patients were not necessarily airway-related. Patients reported feeling at least occasionally "tired" (72.1%) and "exhausted" (66.8%) more than any other asthma symptom. Hyperventilation and mood symptoms were experienced by 34.4-42.6% of patients. Anxiety or depression diagnoses indicated higher scores in all symptom domains. Controlling for asthma-related factors and psychopathology, fatigue had a small but significant effect on both asthma-related quality of life (AQLQ) (rsp2 = 0.02, P < .001) and asthma control (rsp2 = 0.01, P = .003). Mood symptoms also showed a small but significant effect on AQLQ (rsp2 = 0.02, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that extrapulmonary symptoms are endorsed more frequently than previously reported. Symptoms nonspecific to asthma can play a substantial role in clinical presentation and exclusive focus on airway symptoms may miss important information related to patients' well-being. Surveillance of extrapulmonary symptoms alongside pulmonary function is warranted for an integrated medicine approach to asthma management.
Assuntos
Asma , Qualidade de Vida , Ansiedade , Asma/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Fadiga , Humanos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
RATIONALE: Despite the importance of trigger perceptions for asthma diagnosis and management, associations among asthma triggers, affective disorders, and asthma outcome have received little attention. OBJECTIVES: Because anxiety and depression are known to influence patients' health reports, we measured and controlled for these affective disorders in analyzing associations among patient perceptions of asthma triggers and asthma treatment outcomes. METHODS: Patients from a nationally representative sample of respiratory specialist practices (N = 459) were assessed for clinically significant anxiety and depression and completed questionnaires on asthma triggers, quality of life, and asthma control. Physicians recorded exacerbation and emergency treatment frequencies in the prior year, spirometric lung function, and allergy test results. Hierarchical multiple regressions examined associations among reported trigger factors, anxiety, depression, and asthma outcomes, including quality of life, asthma control, exacerbations, emergencies, and spirometry. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients across asthma severity levels were well represented. Anxiety and depression were associated with more frequent nonallergic, in particular psychological, triggers. Controlling for demographics, asthma severity, anxiety, and depression, nonallergic asthma triggers (including psychological triggers) explained substantial portions of variance in asthma control (total of 19.5%, odds ratios [ORs] = 2.07-1.37 for individual triggers), asthma-related quality of life (total of 27.5%, ORs = 3.21-1.49), and general quality of life (total of 11.3%, ORs = 1.93-1.55). Psychological triggers were consistently associated with exacerbations and emergency treatments (ORs = 1.96-2.04) over and above other triggers and affective disorders. Spirometric lung function was largely unrelated to perceived asthma triggers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of asthma triggers are important determinants of asthma outcomes, which can help identify individuals at risk for suboptimal asthma management.