Incidence of Brain Metastases in Nonmetastatic and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Is There a Role for Screening?

BACKGROUND: Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend against screening breast cancer patients for asymptomatic brain metastases. Because brain metastases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality from breast cancer, we undertook a literature review to ascertain whether there might be a role for brain metastases screening in high-risk patient subgroups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on the OvidSP platform in the MedLine database, using MeSH terms and subject headings related to breast cancer, brain metastases, and incidence. The search was conducted without language or publication restrictions, and included articles indexed from January 1, 2006 to June 10, 2018. Experimental and observational studies that reported the incidence of brain metastases in patients with nonmetastatic or metastatic breast cancer were included. RESULTS: One hundred seventy studies were identified, with 33 included in the final analysis. Among nonmetastatic breast cancer patients, incidence of brain metastases as site of first recurrence per year of median follow-up ranged from 0.1% to 3.2%. Although incidence of brain metastases was much higher among the metastatic breast cancer population overall, it was particularly high among metastatic HER2-overexpressing (HER2+) and triple-negative populations, ranging between 22% and 36% for the former, and 15%-37% for the latter in the absence of screening. CONCLUSION: In patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer, screening for asymptomatic brain metastases cannot currently be justified. However, due to the high incidence of brain metastases among patients with metastatic HER2+ and triple-negative breast cancer, studies to determine the value of screening for brain metastases should be undertaken in these subgroups.

A multicenter phase II study of "adjuvant" irinotecan following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent irinotecan following hepatectomy for metachronous colorectal metastases, and examines the predictive value of p27 and p53 expression and of microsatellite instability (MSI) status. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients, previously treated with 5-fluorouracil, with operable hepatic colorectal metastases underwent hepatectomy and received adjuvant irinotecan (thrice weekly) for 6 planned cycles. Metastases were examined for p53 and p27 expression by immunohistochemistry and for MSI using mono- and dinucleotide markers. RESULTS: The starting dose of irinotecan was 350 mg/m2 (in 3 patients), 300 mg/m2 (n = 14), and 250 mg/m2 (n = 12). Four patients failed to complete 6 cycles (2 progressive disease and 2 toxicity). Grade > or =3 toxicity was experienced in 8% of cycles (13 of 165). The estimated median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 45.2 months. RFS at 18 months was estimated to be 59% (95% confidence interval [CI], 43-80), 2-year overall survival (OS) was 85% (95% CI, 72-99.8), and the median follow-up was 27.9 months. Six patients (21%) have died; median OS has not been reached. In univariate analyses, p27 and MSI status were not predictive for RFS while p53 approached statistical significance (P = 0.051). Duration of chemotherapy was the only significant predictive factor (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The tolerability of this regimen after major liver resection supports further evaluation of irinotecan-based adjuvant chemotherapy in this group of patients.