The National Cancer Institute's Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program: a unique funding model 20 years later.

The burden of cancer and access to effective treatment are not experienced equally by all in the United States. For underserved populations that often access the health-care system when their cancers are in advanced disease stages, radiation oncology services are essential. In 2001, the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) Radiation Research Program created and implemented the Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program (CDRP). CDRP was a pioneering funding model whose goal was to increase participation of medically underserved populations in NCI clinical trials. CDRP's Cooperative Agreement funding supported for awardees the planning, development, and conduct of radiation oncology clinical research in institutions not traditionally involved in NCI-sponsored research and cared for a disproportionate number of medically underserved, health-disparities populations. The awardee secured and provided support for mentorship from 1 of 2 NCI comprehensive cancer centers named in its application. Six CDRP awards were made over two 5-year funding periods ending in 2013, with the end-of-program accomplishments previously reported. With the current focus on addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion, the 6 principal investigators were surveyed, 5 of whom responded about the impact of CDRP on their institutions, communities, and personal career paths. The survey that was emailed included 10 questions on a 5-point Likert scale. It was not possible to collect patient data this long after completion of the program. This article provides a 20-year retrospective of the experiences and observations from those principal investigators that can inform those now planning, building, and implementing equity, diversity, and inclusion programs.

Safety and efficacy of stereotactic radioablation targeting pulmonary vein tissues in an experimental model.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radioablation (SR), a commonly used therapy to treat malignant tumors, has been used to treat refractory ventricular tachycardia, but the feasibility of treating atrial fibrillation with SR is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SR targeting pulmonary vein (PV) antral tissues as a potential therapy for atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Seventeen adult canines and 2 adult swine underwent surgical fiducial marker placement, 3-dimensional anatomic rendering computed tomography angiogram of the left atrium, and creation of a treatment plan targeting the right superior PVs. Four treatment doses (15, 20, 25, and 35 Gy) were administered to 4 cohorts. Subjects were monitored for 3-6 months, followed by electrophysiological testing, gross pathological examination, and histopathology in 2 subjects. RESULTS: All subjects received SR treatment without complication. Electrophysiology study and gross pathological analysis demonstrated treatment effect in all treated PVs at 35 Gy and 25 Gy (n = 11 of 11 [100%]), with a partial effect at 20 Gy (n = 4 of 5 [80%]; 1 did not undergo repeat electrophysiology study) and 15 Gy (n = 1 of 2 [50%]). No evidence of collateral injury was found in tissues directly adjacent to the treated PVs. In 2 subjects, detailed histopathology demonstrated evidence of circumferential, transmural scar at the PV ablation sites, with sparing of the surrounding structures. CONCLUSIONS: SR is safe and effective for creating precise circumferential scar and electrical isolation of the right superior PV in an experimental model, with dose dependence between delivered radioablative energy and observed electrical effects.