Decrease in opioid and intra-articular corticosteroid burden after intra-articular hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis treatment.

Aim: We studied changes in opioid prescriptions and corticosteroid injection use for knee osteoarthritis patients before and after intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) use and opioid prescriptions before and after knee arthroplasty (KA). Materials & methods: A total of 1,017,578 knee osteoarthritis members were ascertained from a commercial claims database (Health Intelligence Company LLC, IL, USA) using ICD9/ICD10 diagnosis codes. Results: Eighty two percent of HA patients did not fill opioid prescriptions postinjection, with 54% of opioid users discontinuing fills. Two-thirds of KA patients filled opioid prescriptions within 6 months postsurgery, with 78% of opioid users continuing fills and 62% of nonusers initiating use. Conclusion: Alternative therapies, such as HA, that reduce opioid use may alleviate opioid addiction risks for KA patients who use opioids in the pre- and postoperative periods.

Orthobiologic Interventions Using Ultrasound Guidance.

The application of regenerative therapies for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions has emerged over the last decade with recent acceleration. These include prolotherapy, platelet-rich plasma, and mesenchymal stem cell therapy. These strategies augment the body's innate physiology to heal pathologic processes. This article presents an overview of platelet-rich plasma and mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of musculoskeletal injuries. A brief literature review is included, as are techniques for the use of ultrasound guidance to assist with these procedures.

Mechanisms and efficacy of heat and cold therapies for musculoskeletal injury.

Nonpharmacological treatment strategies for acute musculoskeletal injury revolve around pain reduction and promotion of healing in order to facilitate a return to normal function and activity. Heat and cold therapy modalities are often used to facilitate this outcome despite prevalent confusion about which modality (heat vs cold) to use and when to use it. Most recommendations for the use of heat and cold therapy are based on empirical experience, with limited evidence to support the efficacy of specific modalities. This literature review provides information for practitioners on the use of heat and cold therapies based on the mechanisms of action, physiological effects, and the medical evidence to support their clinical use. The physiological effects of cold therapy include reductions in pain, blood flow, edema, inflammation, muscle spasm, and metabolic demand. There is limited evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) supporting the use of cold therapy following acute musculoskeletal injury and delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). The physiological effects of heat therapy include pain relief and increases in blood flow, metabolism, and elasticity of connective tissues. There is limited overall evidence to support the use of topical heat in general; however, RCTs have shown that heat-wrap therapy provides short-term reductions in pain and disability in patients with acute low back pain and provides significantly greater pain relief of DOMS than does cold therapy. There remains an ongoing need for more sufficiently powered high-quality RCTs on the effects of cold and heat therapy on recovery from acute musculoskeletal injury and DOMS.

Myofascial low back pain: a review.

Myofascial pain syndrome is a common nonarticular local musculoskeletal pain syndrome caused by myofascial trigger points located at muscle, fascia, or tendinous insertions, affecting up to 95% of people with chronic pain disorders. Clinically, myofascial pain syndrome can present as painful restricted range of motion, stiffness, referred pain patterns, and autonomic dysfunction. The underlying cause is often related to muscular imbalances, and following a thorough physical examination the condition should be treated with a comprehensive rehabilitation program. Additional treatment options include pharmacologic, needling with or without anesthetic agents or nerve stimulation, and alternative medicine treatments such as massage or herbal medicines. Repeated trigger point injections should be avoided, and corticosteroids should not be injected into trigger points.

Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with trigger point injections.

The management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has proven very challenging in North America, as evidenced by its mounting socioeconomic burden. Choosing amongst available nonsurgical therapies can be overwhelming for many stakeholders, including patients, health providers, policy makers, and third-party payers. Although all parties share a common goal and wish to use limited health-care resources to support interventions most likely to result in clinically meaningful improvements, there is often uncertainty about the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient. To help understand and evaluate the various commonly used nonsurgical approaches to CLBP, the North American Spine Society has sponsored this special focus issue of The Spine Journal, titled Evidence-Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Without Surgery. Articles in this special focus issue were contributed by leading spine practitioners and researchers, who were invited to summarize the best available evidence for a particular intervention and encouraged to make this information accessible to nonexperts. Each of the articles contains five sections (description, theory, evidence of efficacy, harms, and summary) with common subheadings to facilitate comparison across the 24 different interventions profiled in this special focus issue, blending narrative and systematic review methodology as deemed appropriate by the authors. It is hoped that articles in this special focus issue will be informative and aid in decision making for the many stakeholders evaluating nonsurgical interventions for CLBP.

Positive straight-leg raising in lumbar radiculopathy: is documentation affected by insurance coverage?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether differences exist in documentation of straight-leg raising (SLR), based on insurance coverage. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Managed care organization (MCO). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred people with a diagnosis of lumbar radiculopathy or herniated disk were referred to an MCO for authorization of further treatment. Half were self-directed under a personal injury program (PIP) after automobile collisions, and half were covered under a managed care workmen's compensation (WC) program. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Documentation of an SLR test, strength, sensation, and/or reflexes were eligible for the study. The results of SLR were coded as 0, 1, or 2, for absent, positive unilateral, and positive bilateral, respectively. Additional information included subject age, sex, date of injury, provider type, and presence of attorney representation RESULTS: A positive (unilateral, bilateral) SLR in women was 7.4 times more likely if they were covered by PIP than by WC (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-38.7; P=.018). For men, a positive SLR was 23.5 times more likely if they were covered by a PIP (95% CI, 2.9-189.9; P=.003). The odds of bilateral SLR (radicular pain on both sides) were even more strongly associated with type of reimbursement. For women, bilateral SLR was 105.1 times more likely if they were covered by a PIP than by WC (95% CI, 11.1-992.6; P<.001). For men, bilateral SLR was 38.9 times more likely if covered by a PIP (95% CI, 11.3-133.6; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Reasons for reporting higher rates of positive SLR in the PIP group include an added incentive to treat, poor knowledge of proper interpretation of the SLR test, and/or an increased exaggeration of symptoms.

Complications from therapeutic modalities: results of a national survey of athletic trainers.

OBJECTIVE: To understand better the frequency and type of complications encountered by athletic trainers. DESIGN: A descriptive questionnaire. SETTING: Athletic training facilities at the high school, college, and professional levels, as well as physical therapy clinics. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3012 certified athletic trainers employed in above-mentioned settings. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency and types of complications encountered for different modalities were computed. Primary modality type used and frequency of complications in different settings were explored. RESULTS: Of the 3012 surveyed, 905 (30%) responded, 26% of whom reported a complication; 362 total complications were documented. Cryotherapy accounted for 42% of complications, with allergic reactions (n=86), burns (n=23), and intolerance/pain (n=16) most commonly listed. Electric stimulation accounted for 29% of complications, with skin irritation (n=41), burns (n=40), and intolerance/pain (n=18) most commonly listed. Therapeutic heat accounted for 22% of complications; therapeutic exercise accounted for 7% of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with documented complications in the peer-reviewed literature, our survey results differed vastly with regard to the complications encountered. This may reflect a learning phenomenon, a shift in modality usage, or a general underreporting of complications.