Emerging issues on Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and the role in therapy of daptomycin plus fosfomycin.

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA/MSSA) infections are a major global health-care problem. Bacteremia with S. aureus exhibits high rates of morbidity and mortality and can cause complicated infections such as infective endocarditis (IE). The emerging resistance profile of S. aureus is worrisome, and several international agencies have appealed for new treatment approaches to be developed. AREAS COVERED: Daptomycin presents a rapid bactericidal effect against MRSA and has been considered at least as effective as vancomycin in treating MRSA bacteremia. However, therapy failure is often related to deep-seated infections, e.g. endocarditis, with high bacterial inocula and daptomycin regimens <10 mg/kg/day. Current antibiotic options for treating invasive S. aureus infections have limitations in monotherapy. Daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics, e.g. fosfomycin, may be effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MRSA IE. EXPERT OPINION: Exploring therapeutic combinations has shown fosfomycin to have a unique mechanism of action and to be the most effective option in preventing the onset of resistance to and optimizing the efficacy of daptomycin, suggesting the synergistic combination of fosfomycin with daptomycin is a useful alternative treatment option for MSSA or MRSA IE.

Effectiveness of vancomycin plus cloxacillin compared with vancomycin, cloxacillin and daptomycin single therapies in the treatment of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit model of experimental endocarditis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if the addition of cloxacillin to vancomycin enhances the activity of both monotherapies for treating MSSA and MRSA experimental endocarditis (EE) in rabbits. METHODS: Vancomycin plus cloxacillin was compared with the respective monotherapies and daptomycin. In vitro time-kill studies were performed using standard (105 cfu) and high (108 cfu) inocula of five MRSA, one glycopeptide-intermediate (GISA) and five MSSA strains. One MSSA (MSSA-678) and one MRSA (MRSA-277) strain were selected to be used in the in vivo model. A human-like pharmacokinetics model was applied and the equivalents of cloxacillin 2 g/4 h IV and daptomycin 6 mg/kg/day IV were administered. To optimize vancomycin activity, dosage was adjusted to achieve an AUC/MIC ≥400. RESULTS: Daptomycin sterilized significantly more vegetations than cloxacillin (13/13, 100% versus 9/15, 60%; P = 0.02) and showed a trend of better activity than vancomycin (10/14, 71%; P = 0.09) and vancomycin plus cloxacillin (10/14, 71%; P = 0.09) against MSSA-678. Addition of cloxacillin to vancomycin (13/15, 87%) was significantly more effective than vancomycin (8/16, 50%; P = 0.05) and showed similar activity to daptomycin (13/18, 72%; P = 0.6) against MRSA-277. In all treatment arms, the bacterial isolates recovered from vegetations were re-tested and showed the same daptomycin susceptibility as the original strains. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin plus cloxacillin proved synergistic and bactericidal activity against MRSA. Daptomycin was the most efficacious option against MSSA and similar to vancomycin plus cloxacillin against MRSA. In settings with high MRSA prevalence, vancomycin plus cloxacillin might be a good alternative for empirical therapy of S. aureus IE.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of infections caused by OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam.

BACKGROUND: Ceftazidime-avibactam has in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacilli that produce Class A, C and some D ß-lactamases, and has been successfully used in the treatment of infections caused by cephalosporin and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. However, actual experience in the treatment of OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is limited. OBJECTIVE: To review the characteristics and prognosis of OXA-48 CPE infections treated with ceftazidime-avibactam since introduction of the drug to the current centre during the period October 2014 to December 2016. METHODS: Retrospective assessment of episodes of infection caused by OXA-48 CPE treated with ceftazidime-avibactam, analysing data collected from infection diagnosis until 90 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-four episodes were analysed. Ceftazidime-avibactam was given as the initial definitive treatment in 15 (62.5%) and as salvage therapy in nine (37.5%). Intraabdominal (seven, 29%), urinary (six, 25%) and respiratory (five, 21%) were the most common sources. The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 8.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Clinical cure at 30 days was achieved in 62.5% of episodes. Four (16.7%) patients had adverse events, two of them were related to impaired renal function. Among patients who finished the treatment with ceftazidime-avibactam, seven (35%) were diagnosed with infection recurrence within 90 days of the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: From experience, ceftazidime-avibactam is an effective drug for treating infections due to OXA-48 CPE. From these results a better safety profile than the current best available therapy could be expected.

Emergence of Resistance to Quinolones and ß-Lactam Antibiotics in Enteroaggregative and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Causing Traveler's Diarrhea.

The objective of this study was to assess the antimicrobial resistance of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) and enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) strains causing traveler's diarrhea (TD) and to investigate the molecular characterization of antimicrobial resistance genes to third-generation cephalosporins, cephamycins, and quinolones. Overall, 39 EAEC and 43 ETEC clinical isolates were studied. The susceptibilities of EAEC and ETEC against ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, imipenem, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, co-trimoxazole, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, and rifaximin were determined. All genes encoding resistance determinants were detected by PCR or PCR plus DNA sequencing. The epidemiology of selected EAEC and ETEC strains was studied using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). The resistance to quinolones of EAEC and ETEC strains causing TD has significantly increased over the last decades, and high percentages have been found especially in patients traveling to India and sub-Saharan Africa. Sequence type 38 (ST38) and ST131, carrying the blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-27 genes, respectively, are highly prevalent among extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing EAEC and ETEC strains. The cephamycinase ACT-20 is described in the present study for the first time in EAEC and ETEC strains causing TD in patients who had traveled to Central America. The percentages of resistance to azithromycin in EAEC and ETEC isolates from patients to Southeast Asia/India and Africa are above 25%. Meanwhile, rifaximin is still active against EAEC and ETEC, with the prevalence of resistant strains not being high. In conclusion, fluoroquinolones should no longer be considered the drugs of choice for the prevention or treatment in TD for travelers traveling to India and Africa. Azithromycin and rifaximin are still a good alternative to treat TD caused by EAEC or ETEC.

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for serious infections due to multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: The steady progress in resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) has led to difficulties in treating infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) has in vitro activity against many of these strains, however clinical experience with CAZ/AVI is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of eight patients with infections due to MDR- or XDR-PA treated with CAZ/AVI, including four strains resistant to ceftolozane/tazobactam. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients admitted to a teaching hospital between January 2016 and May 2017 who received CAZ/AVI as initial or continuation therapy for infection due to MDR- and XDR-PA. RESULTS: The sources of infection were hospital-acquired lower respiratory tract infection in five patients (62.5%) and osteomyelitis, meningitis and catheter-related bacteraemia in one patient each. Clinical cure was achieved in 4 patients (50.0%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality rates were 12.5% and 37.5%, respectively. One patient (12.5%) developed encephalopathy that improved with discontinuation of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ/AVI may be a valuable option for serious infections due to resistant PA.

Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy / Elección del tratamiento antibiótico en la infección invasiva aguda por Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guía de la Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is characterized by a notable intrinsic resistance to antibiotics, mainly mediated by the expression of inducible chromosomic β-lactamases and the production of constitutive or inducible efflux pumps. Apart from this intrinsic resistance, P. aeruginosa possess an extraordinary ability to develop resistance to nearly all available antimicrobials through selection of mutations. The progressive increase in resistance rates in P. aeruginosa has led to the emergence of strains which, based on their degree of resistance to common antibiotics, have been defined as multidrug resistant, extended-resistant and panresistant strains. These strains are increasingly disseminated worldwide, progressively complicating the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. In this scenario, the objective of the present guidelines was to review and update published evidence for the treatment of patients with acute, invasive and severe infections caused by P. aeruginosa. To this end, mechanisms of intrinsic resistance, factors favoring development of resistance during antibiotic exposure, prevalence of resistance in Spain, classical and recently appeared new antibiotics active against P. aeruginosa, pharmacodynamic principles predicting efficacy, clinical experience with monotherapy and combination therapy, and principles for antibiotic treatment were reviewed to elaborate recommendations by the panel of experts for empirical and directed treatment of P. aeruginosa invasive infections (AU)

Pseudomonas aeruginosa se caracteriza por una notable resistencia intrínseca a los antibióticos mediada fundamentalmente por la expresión de β-lactamasas cromosómicas inducibles y la producción constitutiva o inducible de bombas de expulsión. Además de esta resistencia intrínseca, P. aeruginosa posee una extraordinaria capacidad para desarrollar resistencia a prácticamente todos los antimicrobianos disponibles a través de la selección de mutaciones. El aumento progresivo de la resistencia en P. aeruginosa ha llevado a la aparición de cepas que, de acuerdo con el grado de resistencia frente a los antibióticos habituales, se han definido como multirresistentes, extensamente resistentes y panresistentes. Estas cepas se están diseminando mundialmente, complicando progresivamente el tratamiento de las infecciones por P. aeruginosa. En este escenario, el objetivo de las presentes recomendaciones es la revisión y puesta al día de la evidencia publicada para el tratamiento de pacientes con infección aguda, invasiva y grave por P. aeruginosa. Con este fin, se han revisado los mecanismos de resistencia intrínseca, factores que favorecen el desarrollo de resistencia durante la exposición a antibióticos, prevalencia de la resistencia en España, antibióticos clásicos así como los de reciente introducción activos frente a P. aeruginosa, principios farmacodinámicos predictores de eficacia, experiencia clínica con tratamientos en monoterapia o terapia combinada y principios del tratamiento antibiótico para elaborar por un panel de xpertos recomendaciones para el tratamiento empírico o dirigido de infecciones invasivas por P. aeruginosa (AU)

Clinical experience with ceftolozane/tazobactam in patients with serious infections due to resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-Pa) has become a concern of increasing relevance nowadays. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) is a novel fifth-generation cephalosporin/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR-Pa. METHODS: The clinical records of all patients diagnosed from May 2016 to May 2017 with an infection due to a MDR-Pa treated with C/T were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients with 24 episodes of infection due to MDR-Pa were included. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of C/T against MDR-Pa ranged from 0.75-8µg/mL. In 14 cases (58%) the use of C/T was off-label, including 8 respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and 6 skin and soft-tissue infections, whilst in 10 cases the use was for approved indications, including 7 urinary tract infections and 3 intra-abdominal infections. C/T was the first-line therapy in only three cases with a mean±standard deviation treatment duration of 9.3±4 days, and it was associated with another active drug (aminoglycoside or colistin) in 16 cases. The global clinical cure rate was 88% (21/24 episodes), and the 6-week mortality rate was 22% (5/23 patients) being higher in RTIs (37%). In these infections, three patients received 2/1g every 8h (q8h) and were cured without mortality, whilst three (60%) of five patients receiving 1/0.5g q8h died. CONCLUSION: C/T had good clinical responses in different types of infection, including both FDA-accepted and off-label indications. The results support the use of higher doses in RTIs.

AUC/MIC Pharmacodynamic Target Is Not a Good Predictor of Vancomycin Efficacy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Experimental Endocarditis.

The aim of this in vivo study was to compare the efficacy of vancomycin at standard doses (VAN-SD) to that of VAN at adjusted doses (VAN-AD) in achieving a VAN area under the curve/MIC ratio (AUC/MIC) of ≥400 against three methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains with different microdilution VAN MICs in an experimental endocarditis model. The valve vegetation bacterial counts after 48 h of VAN therapy were compared, and no differences were observed between the two treatment groups for any of the three strains tested. Overall, for VAN-SD and VAN-AD, the rates of sterile vegetations were 15/45 (33.3%) and 21/49 (42.8%) (P = 0.343), while the medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]) for log10 CFU/g of vegetation were 2 (0 to 6.9) and 2 (0 to 4.5) (P = 0.384), respectively. In conclusion, this VAN AUC/MIC pharmacodynamic target was not a good predictor of vancomycin efficacy in MRSA experimental endocarditis.

Echinocandins Compared to Fluconazole for Candidemia of a Urinary Tract Source: A Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Whether echinocandins could be used to treat candidemia of a urinary tract source (CUTS) is unknown. We aimed to provide current epidemiological information of CUTS and to compare echinocandin to fluconazole treatment on CUTS outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter study of adult patients with candidemia was conducted in 9 hospitals. CUTS was defined as a candidemia with concomitant candiduria by the same organism associated with significant urological comorbidity. The primary outcome assessed was clinical failure (defined by 7-day mortality or persistent candidemia) in patients treated with either an echinocandin or fluconazole. A propensity score was calculated and then entered into a regression model. RESULTS: Of 2176 episodes of candidemia, 128 were CUTS (5.88%). Most CUTS cases were caused by Candida albicans (52.7%), followed by Candida glabrata (25.6%) and Candida tropicalis (16.3%). Clinical failure occurred in 7 patients (20%) treated with an echinocandin and in 15 (17.1%) treated with fluconazole (P = .730). Acute renal failure (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-8.91; P = .047) was the only independent factor associated with clinical failure, whereas early urinary tract drainage procedures (surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic) were identified as protective (AOR, 0.08; 95% CI, .02-.31; P < .001). Neither univariate nor multivariate analysis showed that echinocandin therapy altered the risk of clinical failure. CONCLUSIONS: Initial echinocandin therapy was not associated with clinical failure in patients with CUTS. Notably, acute renal failure predicted worse outcomes and performing an early urologic procedure was a protective measure.

Enterococcus faecium resistente a glucopéptidos. Análisis del genotipode resistencia, virulencia y líneas genéticas / Glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Analysis of the resistance genotype, virulence and genetic lines

Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las características genotípicas de los aislados de Enterococcus con resistencia adquirida a vancomicina (ERV) obtenidos durante un período de 3 años y 2 meses en el Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. Métodos: Se incluyeron en el estudio todos los aislados de ERV obtenidos en el período de enero de2004 a marzo de 2007. Se analizó el mecanismo de resistencia a vancomicina y las resistencias asociadas a otros antibióticos. Los aislados ERV fueron tipificados por electroforesis en campo pulsante (PFGE) ymulti-locus-sequence-typing (MLST).Resultados: Se obtuvieron 39 ERV que fueron identificados como Enterococcus faecium y representaron el 2% del total de enterococos aislados durante el período de tiempo estudiado. El genotipo van A fue detectado en 38 de los aislados y el genotipo vanB2 en uno adicional. Los 39 ERV fueron clasificados en 13 pulsotipos diferentes (A-M) por PFGE, incluyendo un pulsotipo principal, A, que agrupaba 13 aislados. La secuencia tipo fue identificada por MLST en 24 de las cepas (con patrones diferentes o estrechamente relacionados) y todas ellas fueron adscritas al complejo clonal CC17, excepto 2 que fueron adscritasal complejo CC9. Todas las cepas mostraron un fenotipo de multirresistencia, incluyendo en muchos casos ampicilina, ciprofoxacina, eritromicina, estreptomicina, gentamicina, kanamicina y cloranfenicol,albergando múltiples genes de resistencia asociados. Los genes esp y/o hyl fueron detectados en 37 de losERV. Conclusión: Todas las cepas, excepto una, presentaron el genotipo van A y formaban parte mayoritariamente del complejo clonal CC17 (AU)

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyse the genotypic characteristics of all Enterococcusisolates with acquired vancomycin resistance (VRE) recovered in the Hospital Clinic (Barcelona, Spain)in a period of three years and two months. Methods: All VRE isolated in the referred Hospital in the period January 2004-March 2007 were included in the study. The vancomycin resistance mechanism was investigated, as well as other antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Isolates were also typed by pulsed-fleld-gel-electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus-sequence-typing (MLST).Results: Thirty-nine VRE were recovered, all being identifled as E. faecium, representing 2% of total enterococci obtained in that period. Thirty-eight of them carried the van A gene, and one isolate the vanB2 gene.T he 39 VRE were classifled into 13 different pulsotypes (A-M), with one main pulsotype, A, which included 13 isolates. The sequence type was identifled by MLST in 24 VRE (with unrelated or closely-related PFGE patterns), and they were ascribed to the clonal complex CC17, but two classifled as CC9. All VRE showed a multiresistance phenotype, including, in most cases ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, streptomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin and chloramphenicol, harbouring multiple antibiotic resistance genes. The presence of esp and/or hyl genes was identifled in 37 VRE. Conclusion: All VRE, but one, showed the van A genotype and they were mostly ascribed to the high-riskclonal complex CC17 (AU)

High-dose daptomycin plus fosfomycin is safe and effective in treating methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

We describe 3 patients with left-sided staphylococcal endocarditis (1 with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus [MSSA] prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis and 2 with methicillin-resistant S. aureus [MRSA] native-valve endocarditis) who were successfully treated with high-dose intravenous daptomycin (10 mg/kg/day) plus fosfomycin (2 g every 6 h) for 6 weeks. This combination was tested in vitro against 7 MSSA, 5 MRSA, and 2 intermediately glycopeptide-resistant S. aureus isolates and proved to be synergistic against 11 (79%) strains and bactericidal against 8 (57%) strains. This combination deserves further clinical study.

Clinical utility of daptomycin in infective endocarditis caused by Gram-positive cocci.

Gram-positive bacteria account for >80% of all cases of endocarditis. Currently, staphylococci are the leading cause of endocarditis worldwide. Daptomycin is the drug of choice for empirical antibiotic therapy of staphylococcal endocarditis due to its optimal activity both against meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains. Daptomycin has not been proven to be superior to vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA endocarditis. However, daptomycin should be considered the drug of choice for the treatment of MRSA endocarditis caused by strains with a vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2µg/mL, for heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) phenotypes and for glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) strains. Daptomycin is the drug of choice for rescue therapy in cases of MRSA endocarditis in which vancomycin has failed. The appropriate dose of daptomycin has not yet been established; however, for treatment of left-sided endocarditis the dose of daptomycin should be higher than the recommended dose of 6mg/kg/day. Combination antibiotic therapy with daptomycin (e.g. combined with fosfomycin) is a promising treatment for MRSA endocarditis and warrants further investigation. In vivo studies show that daptomycin is superior to vancomycin in the treatment of meticillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci experimental endocarditis, although clinical data are required. Daptomycin could represent an efficacious treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium endocarditis. Finally, the pharmacokinetic profile of daptomycin makes it an excellent drug for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Success of ampicillin plus ceftriaxone rescue therapy for a relapse of Enterococcus faecalis native-valve endocarditis and in vitro data on double beta-lactam activity.

We report a patient with Enterococcus faecalis native-valve endocarditis who relapsed after 4 weeks of treatment with ampicillin plus gentamicin. The relapse was cured with ampicillin plus ceftriaxone, which was introduced after gentamicin-induced acute renal failure. This double beta-lactam combination showed a bactericidal effect in time-killing curve studies.

Daptomycin is effective in treatment of experimental endocarditis due to methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

Daptomycin is a lipopeptide antibiotic with potent in vitro activity against gram-positive cocci, including Staphylococcus aureus. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo efficacies of daptomycin against two clinical isolates: methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) 277 (vancomycin MIC, 2 microg/ml) and glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus (GISA) ATCC 700788 (vancomycin MIC, 8 microg/ml). Time-kill experiments demonstrated that daptomycin was bactericidal in vitro against these two strains. The in vivo activity of daptomycin (6 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h) was evaluated by using a rabbit model of infective endocarditis and was compared with the activities of a high-dose (HD) vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 6 h), the recommended dose (RD) of vancomycin regimen (1 g intravenously every 12 h) for 48 h, and no treatment (as a control). Daptomycin was significantly more effective than the vancomycin RD in reducing the density of bacteria in the vegetations for the MRSA strains (0 [interquartile range, 0 to 1.5] versus 2 [interquartile range, 0 to 5.6] log CFU/g vegetation; P = 0.02) and GISA strains (2 [interquartile range, 0 to 2] versus 6.6 [interquartile range, 2.0 to 6.9] log CFU/g vegetation; P < 0.01) studied. In addition, daptomycin sterilized more MRSA vegetations than the vancomycin RD (13/18 [72%] versus 7/20 [35%]; P = 0.02) and sterilized more GISA vegetations than either vancomycin regimen (12/19 [63%] versus 4/20 [20%]; P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference between the vancomycin HD and the vancomycin RD for MRSA treatment was noted. These results support the use of daptomycin for the treatment of aortic valve endocarditis caused by GISA and MRSA.

Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin treatment failure in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is not uncommon, even when MRSA is susceptible to vancomycin. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration has any influence on the mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia. METHODS: A total of 414 episodes of MRSA bacteremia were prospectively followed-up from 1991 through 2005. MIC of vancomycin for the first isolate was determined by E-test. Clinical variables recorded were age, comorbidity, prior administration of vancomycin, use of corticosteroids, prognosis of underlying disease, source of bacteremia, the need for mechanical ventilation, shock, and mortality. A "treatment group" variable was created and defined as follows: (1) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1 microg/mL (38 episodes), (2) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 1.5 microg/mL (90 episodes), (3) receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (40 episodes), and (4) receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (246 episodes). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Episodes caused by strains with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL were independently associated with a lower risk of shock (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15-0.75). Multivariate analysis selected receipt of empirical vancomycin and an isolate with a vancomycin MIC of 2 microg/mL (OR, 6.39; 95% CI, 1.68-24.3), receipt of inappropriate empirical therapy (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.20-10.9), increasing age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04), use of corticosteroids (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.04-3.29), an ultimately (OR, 10.2; 95% CI, 2.85-36.8) or rapidly (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.10) fatal underlying disease, high-risk (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.89-6.88) and intermediate-risk (OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.17-4.04) sources of bacteremia, and shock (OR, 7.38; 95% CI, 4.11-13.3) as the best predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality associated with MRSA bacteremia was significantly higher when the empirical antibiotic was inappropriate and when vancomycin was empirically used for treatment of infection with strains with a high vancomycin MIC (>1 microg/mL).

Efficacy of telavancin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus.

The efficacy of telavancin, a novel lipoglycopeptide, was evaluated in experimental endocarditis in rabbits using two clinical isolates of glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus: ATCC 700788 and HIP 5836. Infected rabbits were treated for 2 days with telavancin (10 mg/kg of body weight once daily intravenously) or vancomycin (1 g twice daily intravenously), administered with a computer-controlled infusion pump system simulating human serum kinetics. Vegetations were harvested at 16 h postinoculation in the control group and at the end of treatment in the drug-treated group. For ATCC 700788, MICs and minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs), respectively, were 1 mg/liter and 4 mg/liter for telavancin and 8 mg/liter and 128 mg/liter for vancomycin. For HIP 5836, MICs and MBCs, respectively, were 4 mg/liter and 8 mg/liter for telavancin and 8 mg/liter and 128 mg/liter for vancomycin. Peak and trough levels were 90 microg/ml and 6 microg/ml, respectively, for telavancin and 46 microg/ml and 6 microg/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. In glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus ATCC 700788, telavancin sterilized 6 of 16 vegetations (37%), whereas vancomycin sterilized 4 of 20 (20%) (P = 0.29) compared with 0 of 17 in the control group. In HIP 5836 experiments, telavancin and vancomycin sterilized 5 of 16 (31%) and 1 of 15 (7%) vegetations (P = 0.17), respectively, compared with none in the control group. Telavancin reduced vegetation titers by 2.0 and 2.3 logs greater than vancomycin for the ATCC 700788 (4.6 [2.0 to 5.8] versus 6.6 [2.0 to 6.9] log CFU/g vegetation; P = 0.05) and HIP 5836 (4.4 [2.0 to 7.4] versus 6.7 [4.5 to 8.7] log CFU/g vegetation; P = 0.09) strains, respectively; these differences did not reach statistical significance. All isolates from vegetations remained susceptible to telavancin after therapy. The results suggest that telavancin may be an effective treatment for endocarditis caused by glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus.