Evaluation of efficacy and feasibility of foot reflexology in children experiencing chronic or persistent pain.

BACKGROUND: Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM) are increasingly used in the therapeutic arsenal, particularly for pain management. Foot reflexology (FR) is still poorly evaluated, specifically in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of FR sessions in children experiencing chronic or persistent pain. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in two pediatric centers from January 2011 to January 2014. Sessions of FR were offered to children regardless of their age, experiencing persistent pain (>72h) or chronic pain (>3 months). A form was completed by the patient before and after each FR sessions. The effectiveness of the session was evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for both pain and anxiety. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-two patients suffering from persistent pain were included. We observed a significant decrease of mean VAS pain scores after each session (respectively P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.015) and of mean VAS anxiety scores (P<0.001) for all sessions). Seventy patients suffering from chronic pain were included. Decrease in VAS pain scores was statistically significant after each reflexology session for children suffering from headache and musculoskeletal pain (P<0.001). Anxiety was significantly lower after each session (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In 192 pediatric patients, FR significantly reduce pain and anxiety in children suffering from persistent or chronic pain. This CAM could have a place in pain management in children but needs to be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Management of Febrile Neutropenias in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Cost-Minimization Analysis Between Adult Versus Pediatric Units.

PURPOSE: Management of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) differs between adult and pediatric units, especially regarding febrile neutropenia (FN). In our previous study, we found that AYAs treated in adult units were significantly less hospitalized for FN than in pediatric units, without difference in morbimortality. The objective of this work was to assess the economic impact of these practices. METHODS: This study retrospectively collected data from the medical records of AYAs treated at the Comprehensive Cancer Center Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, in the Euro-E-W-I-N-G99 protocol between September 1, 2000 and May 31, 2013. We focused on FN occurring after VIDE (vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, etoposide) courses. Costs were calculated using a micro-costing technique from the hospital's perspective (in 2014-Euro); the time horizon was the induction period. Multivariate analyses were performed on the total cost and cost of FN. Uncertainty was captured by sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Forty-four AYAs (18 in the adult sector, 26 in the pediatric sector) received 260 courses of VIDE. Mean cost of care was €37,544 in the pediatric sector, including €11,948 (32%) for FN (€11,851 in hospitalization), versus €34,677 in the adult sector, including €6,143 (18%) for FN (€5,789 in hospitalization). Cost for FN was significantly higher in pediatric units (difference in mean cost of €5,830 per patient, 95% bootstrapped confidence interval [1,939.1; 10,028.9]). In multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly influencing this cost difference was the sector of care. The most sensitive parameter was the unit cost of conventional hospitalization. CONCLUSION: These results support the adult sector strategy, in agreement with the results of our first work showing comparable effectiveness.

[Use of hypnosis in radiotherapy as an alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric radiation oncology]. / Radiothérapie des enfants de moins de cinq ans : peut-on limiter les anesthésies itératives par les rituels et l'hypnose ?

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is often needed for radiotherapy (RT) in young children. This study aimed to evaluate the place of the rituals and/or hypnosis in pediatric in a reference center in pediatric radiation oncology in Rhône-Alpes Auvergne. METHODS: This observational study retrospectively collected data on AG in children<5 years treated by RT in Leon-Berard regional center, Lyon, France between 2003 and 2014. Two-time periods, before and after 2008 have been compared, the second one introducing accompaniment methods such as hypnosis systematically. Explanatory analyses of AG were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two children benefited from RT in that period and were included (70 patients until 2008, 62 after 2008). Fifty-three percent were irradiated under GA. There was significant reduction (P<0.1) in the use of GA after 2008. The use of GA was not significantly associated with the RT techniques. The patients more likely to undergo RT without GA were the oldest and the patients treated for abdominal lesions (P<0.01). DISCUSSION: The study confirms that rituals and hypnosis can be used instead of GA in about half of patients under 5 years, even also with high-technicity RT requiring optimal immobilization.

[A French survey on the resort of oral alternative complementary medicines used in children with cancer]. / Évaluation du recours aux médecines alternatives et complémentaires orales dans un service d'onco-hématologie pédiatrique.

INTRODUCTION: The use of oral complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among cancer patients, but considerably less known in pediatric cancer patients. Our survey was conducted in a pediatric onco-hematology unit to study the frequency and the circumstances of CAM use. METHODS: This study included 50 children treated for malignant diseases. A questionnaire was used to collect support general data on the child as well as information on the CAM use. One of the child's parents was interviewed. RESULTS: Most of parents (48%) used one or more CAM for their child in the context of cancer. The most used type of CAM was homeopathy, dietary supplements and aromatherapy. The most frequent goal for CAM use was to limit the side effects of conventional treatment (75% of parents). For 87.5% of users, the CAM was effective. Physicians were not aware of this use for 33.3% of users, in spite of the fact that the family physician was the main source of information for this use. Most of parents (48%) needed more information about the CAM and they bought CAM in a pharmacy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of oral CAM in this survey was common. For most parents, this use was effective and appreciated because they generated fewer side effects than conventional treatments. However, doctors were not systematically informed of this use. This is problematic because some CAM such as herbal supplements could potentially cause interactions with cancer treatments. More information about CAM is necessary in pediatric onco-hematology.

The off-label use of targeted therapies in sarcomas: the OUTC'S program.

BACKGROUND: Few targeted therapies (TTs) are registered for sarcoma treatment despite numerous phase II studies and yet there are potential treatment options for patients after standard treatment escape. The French Sarcoma Group - Bone Tumor Study Group (GSF-GETO) created a national registry to evaluate the outcome of patients treated with off-label TTs. METHODS: Every consecutive sarcoma-patient receiving an off-label TT outside a clinical trial was included. The objective was to describe this patient efficacy and safety data in routine practice. RESULTS: From October 2008 to October 2011, 249 patients in 24 centers received 278 treatment lines with TTs. Twenty-five histological subtypes were included: most frequent were leiomyosarcoma (n=48, receiving sorafenib in 63%, and sunitinib in 27%), GIST (n=39, receiving sorafenib in 79%), and angiosarcoma (n=18, receiving sorafenib in 78%). The overall response rate to TTs was 15% (95% CI [10,6-20,2]), the disease control rate at 2 months was 59%. The median progression-free survival was 4,1 months (IC 95% [3,2-4,8]). Three complete responses were observed. No toxic death occurred, grade 3 and 4 toxicities were reported in 74 (27%) and 14 patients (5%) respectively. CONCLUSION: Off-label TTs can be used for sarcoma patients in routine practice with an acceptable toxicity profile and efficacy similar to that reported in non-randomized clinical trials.

Multidisciplinarity and medical decision, impact for patients with cancer: sociological assessment of two tumour committees' organization.

PURPOSE: Medical practices in oncology are expected to be multidisciplinary, yet few articles studied how this may be concretely applied. In the present study, we evaluated the organization of two multidisciplinary committees, one for breast cancer and one for sarcoma, in a French Comprehensive Cancer Centre. METHODS: Both tumours were specifically chosen so as to emphasise substantial differences in relation with incidence, histological subtypes, management strategy, and scientific evidence. Between 2003 and 2004, 404 decision processes were observed, 210 for sarcoma (26 meetings) and 194 for breast cancer (10 meetings). The number of physicians who took part in the discussions and their medical specialties were systematically noted as well as the number of contradictory discussions, medical specialties represented in these contradictory discussions and the topics of contradiction. The last measured data was whether the final committee's decision was in conformity with the referent preferences or not. All these measures were related to the referent's medical speciality and working place, to the stage of the disease and to the disease management stage. RESULTS: Committees' specificities concerned their organization, referent's medical specialties, the number of participants in discussions and their medical specialties. Discussions in the sarcoma committee tended to be more multidisciplinary, involving more specialties. Initial strategy proposal for one patient was modified during the discussions for 86 patients out of 210 (41%) and for 62 out of 194 (32%) respectively for sarcoma and breast cancer. However, there was no significant difference in the rate of contradictory discussions between breast cancer and sarcoma committees (32% versus 41% respectively; P = 0.08). The rates of contradictory discussions were similar for localized cancers, local relapse and metastasis disease (37%, 41% and 34% respectively; P = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports more than 30% of changes concerning strategy for patient with cancer due to multidisciplinary discussions. This indicates that, providing tumour committees are adapted to the pathologies' characteristics, they can promote a collective and multidisciplinary approach to oncology.

18F-FDG PET SUVmax correlates with osteosarcoma histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: preclinical evaluation in an orthotopic rat model.

UNLABELLED: Assessment of osteosarcoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is performed by histopathologic analysis after surgical resection of the primary tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether (18)F-FDG PET could be a noninvasive surrogate to histopathologic analysis and allow for earlier response evaluation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma. METHODS: Metabolic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed in immunocompetent rats with a preestablished orthotopic osteosarcoma using (18)F-FDG PET before and after receiving 2 doses of ifosfamide. Comparison was then made by assessing histologic responses on euthanized animals. RESULTS: Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured by (18)F-FDG PET after 2 doses of chemotherapy was correlated to histologic classification (P < 0.01). An SUVmax less than 15 corresponded to good responders, whereas an SUVmax greater than 15 but less than 20 and an SUVmax greater than 20 corresponded to partial responders or nonresponders, respectively. A 40% decrease in SUVmax between the first and second (18)F-FDG PET scans distinguished between partial and good response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Determination of SUVmax using semiquantitative (18)F-FDG PET predicts response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy earlier than does histologic analysis.

[Standards & options: recommendations for the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in anaemic cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (2007 update)]. / Standards, Options : recommandations 2007 indication des agents stimulant l'érythropièse (ASE) dans la prise en charge de l'anémie induite par la radiothérapie (mise à jour).

INTRODUCTION: Beginning 1998, a working group of specialists convened by the guidelines department (Standards, Option and Recommendations: SOR) of the National French Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) published then regularly updated Recommendations relative to the use of ESA(epoetin alfa, epoetin bêta, darbepoetin) in anaemic patients with cancer. This article presents the updated Recommendations set up in 2007. METHODS: This updating process is based on the methodology developed and used in the "Standards, Options: Recommendations" programme. The methodological approach combines systematic review with the judgement of a multidisciplinary group of experts. On the basis of analysis of literature, the conclusions and their level of evidence are established. Then, the conclusions accompanied by experts' judgement lead to the Recommendations. A Recommendation is a proposal of one or several clinical attitudes intended to improve cancer patient care. Before publication, the RPC-SOR are re-examined by independent reviewers selected according to the same principles as the group of expert writers. RESULTS: New data, relative to the "use of ESA in anaemic cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy", didn't lead to update the latest Recommendations validated in 2003. However, new data relative to the "use of ESA in anaemic prophylaxis among adult patients with cancer" and to the "use of iron with ESA in cancer patients" were sufficient to generate either major or minor modifications to the initial Recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, it appears relevant to re-examine these Recommendations according to a systematic monitoring process which should be renewed in two years.

[Pain and cancer Information dedicated to cancer patients and relatives]. / Douleur et cancer Informations à l'usage des personnes malades et de leurs proches.

Patient information is a major challenge for public health. It has become part of the patients' rights, in response to their need for information and involvement in medical decision-making. Since 1998, the French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) has developed an information and education program dedicated to patients and relatives: the SOR SAVOIR PATIENT program. The methodology of the program adheres to the quality criteria established for the elaboration of documents containing patient information. The SOR SAVOIR PATIENT guide Pain and Cancer aims to answer patients' questions regarding cancer specific pain and to help them become actively involved in their care. It was elaborated by a multidisciplinary workgroup, which included methodologists, one linguist, pain specialists and twenty patients and relatives. Patients' information needs and personal experience of pain were assessed using focus groups, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires. Through eight chapters, which can be read in an independent way, Pain and cancer provides key information on the causes, the mechanisms, the evaluation, the prevention and the treatment of pain. The guide also presents advices and practical tools to facilitate the assessment of the pain and the communication between patients and professionals. Finally, this guide aims to overcome ideas such as that morphine is synonymous of end of life or drug addiction, that pain is a sign of aggravation of cancer and that nurses know how to detect the pain. Intended first for the patients and their close relations, Pain and Cancer is also a useful tool for health professionals. Indeed, it presents knowledge based on the most recent recommendations developed for clinical practice. Thanks to a wide distribution of the guide to patients, their families and the professionals, we trust that this guide will facilitate dialogue around pain, and ultimately its care. This article is an abstract of the guide. The complete SOR SAVOIR PATIENT guide can be downloaded from the SOR website at: www.sor-cancer.fr.

[Clinical Practice guidelines for the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA: epoetin alfa, epoetin bêta, darbepoetin) in anaemic patients with cancer: 2007 update (summary report)]. / Standards, Options: recommandations 2007. Indication des agents stimulant l'érythropoïèse (ASE: époétine alpha, époétine bêta et darbépoétine) dans la prise en charge de l'anémie en cancérologie (mise à jour), rapport abrégé.

UNLABELLED: Beginning 1998, a working group of specialists convened by the guidelines department (Standards, Options and Recommendations: SOR) of the National French Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) published then regularly updated Recommendations relative to the use of ESA in anaemic patients with cancer. This article presents a short version of the Recommendations updated in 2007. METHODS: This updating process is based on the methodology developed and used in the "Standards, Options: Recommendations" programme. The methodological approach combines systematic review with the judgement of a multidisciplinary group of experts. A Recommendation is a proposal of one or several clinical attitudes intended to improve cancer patient care. There are two levels of gradation for the Recommendations: Standards and Options. Their setting takes into account the organisational context of care, the particular situation of the patient and the expression of his preferences. Before publication, the RPC-SOR are re-examined by independent reviewers selected according to the same principles as the group of expert writers. RESULTS: New data are sufficiently important to update the latest Recommendations validated in 2003. Thus, five clinical questions were updated. The resulting modifications were either major (new Options or new Standards) or minor (increased level of evidence). It should be noted that for the clinical question--use of ESA in radiotherapy--new data are not sufficient to generate modifications in the initial Recommendations which remain valid. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the important new data published on the subject between 2003 and 2007, it appears relevant to re-examine these Recommendations according to a systematic monitoring process which should be renewed in 2 years.