ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies: an infectious diseases perspective (Soluble immune effector molecules [II]: agents targeting interleukins, immunoglobulins and complement factors).

BACKGROUND: The present review is part of the ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies. AIMS: To review, from an Infectious Diseases perspective, the safety profile of agents targeting interleukins, immunoglobulins and complement factors and to suggest preventive recommendations. SOURCES: Computer-based MEDLINE searches with MeSH terms pertaining to each agent or therapeutic family. CONTENT: Patients receiving interleukin-1 (IL-1) -targeted (anakinra, canakinumab or rilonacept) or IL-5-targeted (mepolizumab) agents have a moderate risk of infection and no specific prevention strategies are recommended. The use of IL-6/IL-6 receptor-targeted agents (tocilizumab and siltuximab) is associated with a risk increase similar to that observed with anti-tumour necrosis factor-α agents. IL-12/23-targeted agents (ustekinumab) do not seem to pose a meaningful risk of infection, although screening for latent tuberculosis infection may be considered and antiviral prophylaxis should be given to hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients. Therapy with IL-17-targeted agents (secukinumab, brodalumab and ixekizumab) may result in the development of mild-to-moderate mucocutaneous candidiasis. Pre-treatment screening for Strongyloides stercoralis and other geohelminths should be considered in patients who come from areas where these are endemic who are receiving IgE-targeted agents (omalizumab). C5-targeted agents (eculizumab) are associated with a markedly increased risk of infection due to encapsulated bacteria, particularly Neisseria spp. Meningococcal vaccination and chemoprophylaxis must be administered 2-4 weeks before initiating eculizumab. Patients with high-risk behaviours and their partners should also be screened for gonococcal infection. IMPLICATIONS: Preventive strategies are particularly encouraged to minimize the occurrence of neisserial infection associated with eculizumab.

Opportunistic infections and biologic therapies in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: consensus recommendations for infection reporting during clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance.

No consensus has previously been formed regarding the types and presentations of infectious pathogens to be considered as 'opportunistic infections' (OIs) within the setting of biologic therapy. We systematically reviewed published literature reporting OIs in the setting of biologic therapy for inflammatory diseases. The review sought to describe the OI definitions used within these studies and the types of OIs reported. These findings informed a consensus committee (infectious diseases and rheumatology specialists) in deliberations regarding the development of a candidate list of infections that should be considered as OIs in the setting of biologic therapy. We reviewed 368 clinical trials (randomised controlled/long-term extension), 195 observational studies and numerous case reports/series. Only 11 observational studies defined OIs within their methods; no consistent OI definition was identified across studies. Across all study formats, the most numerous OIs reported were granulomatous infections. The consensus group developed a working definition for OIs as 'indicator' infections, defined as specific pathogens or presentations of pathogens that 'indicate' the likelihood of an alteration in host immunity in the setting of biologic therapy. Using this framework, consensus was reached upon a list of OIs and case-definitions for their reporting during clinical trials and other studies. Prior studies of OIs in the setting of biologic therapy have used inconsistent definitions. The consensus committee reached agreement upon an OI definition, developed case definitions for reporting of each pathogen, and recommended these be used in future studies to facilitate comparison of infection risk between biologic therapies.

Evaluation of bone mineral density and fat-lean distribution in patients with multiple myeloma in sustained remission.

To study the usefulness of bone mineral density (BMD) in the follow-up of myeloma (MM) patients, BMD was evaluated in 44 MM patients in sustained remission for at least 2 years (35.4 +/- 10.5 months) after high-dose or conventional chemotherapy in a retrospective study. Patients never received bisphosphonates before or during the follow-up. Patients underwent lumbar spine (LS) BMD and a whole body (WB) BMD testing before therapy and at least once in the remission period. At baseline, mean LS BMD was 0.863 +/- 0.026 g/cm2, mean lumbar Z-score was -1.45 SD. LS BMD significantly increased from baseline by 5 +/- 1.8%, 9.3 +/- 1.7%, and 14 +/- 1.9% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. The percentage of patients with a T-score below 2.5 SD decreased from 39% at baseline to 18.5% at 3 years. Compared with baseline, WB BMD decreased by -2.8 +/- 0.5%, -2.6 +/- 0.7%, and -1.7 +/- 0.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Mean percentage change of the fat compartment increased from baseline by +28.4 +/- 7.1% at the trunk, and +17.1 +/- 5% in peripheral areas at 3 years. In conclusion, in MM patients in remission after chemotherapy, LS BMD progressively increased after a mean follow-up of 3 years. These patients never received bisphosphonates, so this increase was related to the anti-myeloma treatment. The major effect on BMD was observed at the LS, which is primarily composed of trabecular bone containing the bone marrow. Interestingly, a drastic increase of the fat content was also observed. These results underlined that BMD and fat-lean evaluation could be of interest in the follow-up of MM patients.

Bone densitometry in patients with multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE, PATIENTS, AND METHODS: We performed dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 10 selected patients with aggressive multiple myeloma in whom substantial tumor mass reduction was achieved after high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: In most cases, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was initially low (Mean Z score: -2.69, SEM 0.76) and dramatically increased after treatment (mean increase 16.4%; 7.7% with 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 12.2, excluding one patient whose spine BMD increased by 94.8%). In contrast, skeletal roentgenograms, computed tomographic scans, and magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal any significant improvement of patients' bone lesions. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multiple myeloma, bone densitometry could be a useful way to assess the efficacy of treatment on bone status.