Association between beverage consumption and risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective study from the French E3N Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between consumption of largely consumed beverages (coffee, tea, alcohol and soft drinks) and the risk of RA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The E3N Study (Étude Épidémiologique auprès des femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Éducation Nationale) is a French prospective cohort including 98 995 women since 1990. Food and beverage consumption was assessed using a validated food-frequency questionnaire. Hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% CI for incident RA were estimated by Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Among 62 631 women, 481 incident RA cases were identified. Consumptions of tea, alcohol and sugar-sweetened soft drinks were not associated with RA risk. We observed a linear association between coffee consumption and RA risk [≥4 cups/day vs ≤1cup/day, HR = 1.24; 95% CI (0.94, 1.64), Ptrend = 0.04], and a higher risk of RA with artificially sweetened soft drinks consumption [consumers vs not, HR = 1.66; 95% CI (1.12, 2.45)], particularly in never-smokers. Among ever-smokers, moderate liquor intake was associated with a reduced risk of RA [1-3 glasses/week vs non-consumers, HR = 0.63; 95% CI (0.43, 0.91)] and moderate wine consumption with a reduced risk of seropositive RA. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of women, tea, alcohol and sugar-sweetened soft drinks consumption was not associated with RA risk, whereas consumption of coffee (especially caffeinated coffee), and artificially sweetened soft drinks was associated with higher RA risk, particularly among never-smokers. If further confirmed, these results could lead to novel mechanistic hypotheses and to simple prevention measures.

Evaluation of the impact of a nurse-led program of systematic screening of comorbidities in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: The results of the COMEDSPA prospective, controlled, one year randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a nurse-led program of systematic screening for the management (detection/prevention) of comorbidities. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, controlled, open, 12-month trial (NCT02374749). PARTICIPANTS: consecutive patients with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (according to the rheumatologist) THE PROGRAM: A nurse collected data on comorbidities during a specific outpatient visit. In the event of non-agreement with recommendations, the patient was informed and a specific recommendation was given to the patient (orally and in a with a detailed written report). Patients were seen after one year in a nurse-led visit. TREATMENT ALLOCATION: random allocation (i.e. either this program or an educational program not presented here and considered here as the control group). MAIN OUTCOME: change after one year of a weighted comorbidity management score (0 to 100 where 0= optimal management). RESULTS: 502 patients were included (252 and 250 in the active and control groups, respectively): age: 47±12 years, male gender: 63%, disease duration: 14±11y. After one year, no differences were observed in a weighted comorbidity management score. However, the number of patients in agreement with recommendations was significantly higher in the active group for vaccinations (flu vaccination: 28.6% vs. 9.9%, p<0.01; pneumococcal vaccination:40.0% vs. 21.1%,p=0.04), for cancer screening (skin cancer screening: 36.3% vs. 17.2%, p=0.04) and for osteoporosis (bone densitometry performed: 22.6% vs. 8.7%, p<0.01; Vitamin D supplementation initiation: 51.9% vs. 9.4%, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests the short-term benefit of a single-visit nurse-led program for systematic screening of comorbidities for its management in agreement with recommendations, even in this young population of patients with axSpA.

A Machine Learning Approach for High-Dimensional Time-to-Event Prediction With Application to Immunogenicity of Biotherapies in the ABIRISK Cohort.

Predicting immunogenicity for biotherapies using patient and drug-related factors represents nowadays a challenging issue. With the growing ability to collect massive amount of data, machine learning algorithms can provide efficient predictive tools. From the bio-clinical data collected in the multi-cohort of autoimmune diseases treated with biotherapies from the ABIRISK consortium, we evaluated the predictive power of a custom-built random survival forest for predicting the occurrence of anti-drug antibodies. This procedure takes into account the existence of a population composed of immune-reactive and immune-tolerant subjects as well as the existence of a tiny expected proportion of relevant predictive variables. The practical application to the ABIRISK cohort shows that this approach provides a good predictive accuracy that outperforms the classical survival random forest procedure. Moreover, the individual predicted probabilities allow to separate high and low risk group of patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the use of machine learning procedures to predict biotherapy immunogenicity based on bioclinical information. It seems that such approach may have potential to provide useful information for the clinical practice of stratifying patients before receiving a biotherapy.

Immunization to rituximab is more frequent in systemic autoimmune diseases than in rheumatoid arthritis: ofatumumab as alternative therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The frequency and consequences of anti-drug antibodies to rituximab (RTX-ADA) are not well known in RA and even less in other systemic auto-immune diseases (sAID). We aimed to evaluate the frequency, consequences and predictive factors of RTX-ADA in RA and sAID. METHODS: All patients presenting with RA or other sAID treated with RTX from 2012 to 2017 in our tertiary reference centre for sAID were retrospectively studied. Patients who were tested for RTX-ADA were identified. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients were treated with RTX (RA: 124, other sAID: 75). Among 62/199 (31.1%) tested for RTX-ADA, 14 were positive: 3/35 RA (8.6%) and 11/27 (40.7%) other sAID, (P = 0.0047). Among the whole RTX-treated populations, the frequency of RTX-ADA was 2.4% and 14.7% (P = 0.0026) in RA and sAID, respectively. Most of the immunized patients had infusion reactions to second or subsequent RTX cycles (11/14) and loss of efficacy (2/14). Predictive factors of immunization were sAID vs RA (78.6% vs 21.4%, P = 0.026, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 5.35[1.43-54.75]) and African ethnicity (57.1% vs 4.2%, P < 0.001, adjusted OR = 9.25 [5.08-302.12]). Associated immunosuppressive therapy did not protect against immunization. Three patients with pSS immunized against RTX were treated with ofatumumab with complete remission of their disease. CONCLUSION: Immunization against RTX is more frequent in other sAID than in RA. Testing for RTX-ADA must be performed in patients with infusion reactions or loss of efficacy especially if they are of African origin. Immunized patients might be treated efficiently and safely with ofatumumab. This alternative should be further evaluated for sAID.

Paradoxical anti-TNF-associated TB worsening: Frequency and factors associated with IRIS.

OBJECTIVES: Paradoxical tuberculosis (TB) worsening, an example of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), is an increasing phenomenon now described in several settings, including anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) discontinuation during biotherapy-induced TB. To better recognize it, we analyzed the frequency and factors associated with anti-TNF-induced TB-IRIS. METHODS: Case-control study on anti-TNF-associated TB patients. IRIS cases, defined with the following consensus criteria, were matched to two controls (anti-TNF-associated TB without IRIS). IRIS frequency was based on the French RATIO registry. Conditional logistic-regression identified IRIS risk factors. RESULTS: Fourteen patients developed anti-TNF-associated TB-IRIS within medians of 45 [IQR 22-131] days after starting anti-TB therapy and 110 [IQR 63-164] days after the last anti-TNF infusion. Each case was matched to two controls by year of TB diagnosis. IRIS-associated factors were (odds ratio [95% CI]): disseminated TB (11.4 [1.4-92.2], P=0.03), history of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure (12.7 [1.6-103.0], P=0.02) and steroid use at the time of TB diagnosis (4.6 [1.2-17.2], P=0.02). The RATIO registry IRIS frequency was 7%. CONCLUSION: After stopping biotherapy, paradoxical anti-TNF-associated TB worsening occurred most often in patients with disseminated TB. Although diagnosis remains difficult, physicians must be aware of IRIS because prolonged anti-TB treatment is not needed but, paradoxically, immunosuppressant reintroduction may be.

New biological therapies in Sjögren's syndrome.

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by dryness and systemic involvement in more than a third of the patients. Patient management has suffered from the lack of effective treatments. However, progresses made in the understanding of pSS pathogenesis have allowed a move to a more targeted approach to therapeutic intervention. Given the key role of chronic B cell activation, B cell-targeted therapies were the first candidate. New pathways are currently investigated including costimulation and ectopic germinal centre formation. In this review, we have summarized the new tools available in clinical research in the field of pSS, the current evidence regarding B cell-targeted therapies and an overview of the promising drugs in the pipeline.

Evolution of direct costs in the first years of rheumatoid arthritis: impact of early versus late biologic initiation--an economic analysis based on the ESPOIR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate annual direct costs of early RA by resource component in an inception cohort, with reference to four distinct treatment strategies: no disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), synthetic DMARDs only, biologic DMARDs in the first year ('first-year biologic', FYB), and biologic DMARDs from the second year after inclusion ('later-year biologic', LYB); to determine predictors of total and non-DMARD related costs. METHODS: The ESPOIR cohort is a French multicentric, prospective study of 813 patients with early arthritis. Data assessing RA-related resource utilisation and disease characteristics were collected at baseline, biannually during the first two years and annually thereafter. Costs predictors were determined by generalised linear mixed analyses. RESULTS: Over the 4-year follow-up, mean annual direct total costs per treatment strategy group were €3,612 for all patients and €998, €1,922, €14,791, €8,477 respectively for no DMARDs, synthetic DMARDs only, FYB and LYB users. The main predictors of higher costs were biologic use and higher Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores at baseline. Being a biologic user led to a higher total cost (FYB Rate Ratio (RR) 7.22, [95% CI 5.59-9.31]; LYB RR 4.39, [95% CI 3.58-5.39]) compared to non-biologic users. Only LYB increased non-DMARD related costs compared to all other patients by 60%. CONCLUSIONS: FYB users incurred the highest levels of total costs, while their non-DMARD related costs remained similar to non-biologic users, possibly reflecting better RA control.

Potentiation of fluindione or warfarin by dexamethasone in multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with primary systemic (AL) amyloidosis or multiple myeloma are frequently treated with cyclic dexamethasone (DXM) courses and often require oral anticoagulants. We previously reported a strong potentiation of oral anticoagulants with intravenous methylprednisolone and observed a similar potentiation with DXM in 3 patients, which led us to prospectively investigate the interaction between DXM and oral anticoagulants. METHODS: Nine patients with multiple myeloma (n=6) or AL amyloidosis (n=3), including 6 prospective patients, taking fluindione (n=8) or warfarin (n=1), were studied for a total of 10 cycles. DXM (40 mg/day for 4 days every 28 days) was administered alone (n=4) or with melphalan (n=5). One patient was studied for 2 consecutive cycles after a moderate increase in the international normalized ratio (INR) during the first course of DXM. International normalized ratio (INR) was measured serially during DXM administration. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations were measured for 5 cycles. RESULTS: The mean INR increased from 2.75 (range: 1.80-3.6) at baseline to 5.22 (3.09-7.07) after DXM. Oral anticoagulants were transiently stopped during 8 cycles and 1 mg oral vitamin K was given during 2. No serious bleeding was observed. Plasma oral anticoagulant concentrations increased after DXM administration. In controls receiving DXM without oral anticoagulants, DXM alone did not increase prothrombin time. CONCLUSION: High dose DXM can potentiate oral anticoagulants and elevate INR substantially. INR should therefore be monitored repeatedly during concomitant administration of these 2 drugs to allow individual adaptation of oral anticoagulant doses.

Methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: clinical practice guidelines based on published evidence and expert opinion.

OBJECTIVES: To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), using the evidence-based approach and expert opinion. METHODS: A scientific committee used a Delphi procedure to select five questions, which formed the basis for developing recommendations. Evidence providing answers to the five questions was sought in the Cochrane databases, PubMed, and proceedings of meetings of the French Society for Rheumatology, European League Against Rheumatism, and American College of Rheumatology. Using this evidence, a group of rheumatologists developed and validated the recommendations. For each recommendation, the level of evidence and the extent of agreement among experts were specified. RESULTS: The recommendations were as follows: 1: The starting dosage for methotrexate in patients with RA should not be less than 10 mg/week and should be determined based on disease severity and patient-related factors; 2: When a patient with RA shows an inadequate response to methotrexate, the dosage should be increased at intervals of 6 weeks, up to 20 mg/week, according to tolerance and patient-related factors; 3: When starting methotrexate treatment in a patient with RA, preference should be given to the oral route. A switch to the intramuscular or subcutaneous route should be considered in patients with poor compliance, inadequate effectiveness, or gastrointestinal side effects; 4: At present, there is no evidence indicating that a change in methotrexate dosage is in order when a TNF antagonist is given concomitantly; 5: The investigations that are mandatory before starting methotrexate therapy in a patient with RA consist of a full blood cell count, serum transaminase levels, serum creatinine with computation of creatinine clearance, and a chest radiograph. In addition, serological tests for the hepatitis viruses B and C and a serum albumin assay are recommended. In patients with a history of respiratory disease or current respiratory symptoms, lung function tests with determination of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide are recommended; 6: Investigations that are mandatory for monitoring methotrexate therapy in patients with RA consist of full blood cell counts and serum transaminase and creatinine assays. These tests should be obtained at least once a month for the first 3 months then every 4-12 weeks; 7: Folate supplementation can be given routinely to patients treated with methotrexate for RA. In practice, a minimal dosage of 5 mg of folic acid once a week, at a distance from the methotrexate dose, is appropriate; 8: In the event of respiratory symptoms possibly related to methotrexate toxicity, the drug must be stopped and symptom severity evaluated. Should evidence of serious disease be found, the patient should be admitted immediately or advice from a pulmonologist should be obtained immediately. CONCLUSION: Recommendations about methotrexate therapy for RA were developed. These recommendations should help to improve practice uniformity and, ultimately, to improve the management of RA.

Emerging biological therapies in rheumatoid arthritis.

The introduction of TNFalpha inhibitors has radically changed the management of patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or spondyloarthropathy. However, among patients with RA unresponsive to methotrexate, only two-thirds respond to TNFalpha inhibitors. Fortunately, more than 5 years after infliximab was introduced on the market, preliminary evidence that emerging biological agents are effective is beginning to accumulate, generating new hope for patients who fail to respond to TNFalpha inhibitors. These novel biological therapies grew out of original pathophysiological hypotheses, a fact that vividly illustrates the importance of basic pathophysiological research for developing new medications. This review provides detailed information on three biological therapies whose efficacy in RA was demonstrated in recently published randomized placebo-controlled trials: a monoclonal antibody to the IL-6 receptor (MRA), CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), and a monoclonal B-cell-specific antibody to CD20 (rituximab). Good risk/benefit ratios seem to be achieved with MRA alone or with abatacept or rituximab combined with methotrexate. However, as yet, no radiographic data are available for these treatments. One of the challenges for the future is to identify ingenious combinations of biological therapies capable of improving the quality and duration of responses without exacerbating side effects.