Co-administration of pazopanib and enteral nutrition with omega-3 fatty acids as a safety issue in a patient treated for metastatic clear cell renal cancer: A case report.

Pazopanib is an oral multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), approved as the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) at a fixed dose of 800 mg daily taken fasted. Potential drug-meal interactions and adverse events (AEs) may lack recognition and the related data in literature. We report one case of stomatitis/oral mucositis associated with pazopanib administrated with an oral nutritional supplement enriched with omega-3 fatty acids. The 50-year-old patient with mRCC started pazopanib treatment at standard doses of 800 mg daily as first-line therapy for mRCC, and after a few days, he developed stomatitis. Co-administration of pazopanib with high-fat meals could increase the solubility of highly lipophilic pazopanib, increasing its plasma pazopanib area under the curve (AUC), and maximum concentration (Cmax) above optimal therapeutic level can consequently lead to increased frequency/grade of AEs.

The Oncology Association of Bosnia and Herzegovina's recommendations for fertility preservation in oncologic patients.

Malignancy is one of the major public health problems in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Along with breakthroughs in specific oncological therapy, improving the quality of life of cancer patients and management of therapy-induced side effects need to be recognized as a priority in the comprehensive cancer patient care. Fertility loss after cancer treatment is a field requiring special attention due to its various consequences on patients themselves.  Although oncofertility is well-recognized area of oncology, low- to middle-income countries are facing issues with its implementation in everyday practice. Increased awareness about fertility preservation is of high priority for all specialists who participate in the medical care of cancer patients. The absence of a systemic solution and lack of expertise led to the founding of Fertility Preservation Working Group of the Oncology Association of Bosnia and Herzegovina. We have made recommendationsas an expert consensus with the ultimate goal of making the first step towards enhancement of oncofertility implementation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine among Cancer Patients Undergoing Conventional Treatment: A Single-Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: The alternative medicine is increasingly accepted by modern man. People realize that healing based on natural methods is much more affordable and not more aggressive than taking potent drugs of synthetic origin. The aim of this study was to collect data on the use of complementary agents and alternative medicine in cancer patients treated at the Oncology Clinic of the University Clinical Hospital in Mostar. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study that included 100 patients. Data were collected from a questionnaire compiled for this research, which comprised two groups of questions. The first group examined the sociodemographic characteristics of the respondents, and the second the modalities of using Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), and health and conceptual reasons for use. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients (72.0%) had used a CAM during their anticancer treatment. Only 23% of patients had used CAM before the diagnosis of cancer. Among them, 26 (36.1%) previously discussed the topic with their oncologist. CAMs ranged from herbal medicine (58.3%), cannabinoid oil (19.4%) and different vitamins and minerals (22.2%). CAMs were mainly used to improve the health (40.3%). Among patients who used CAM only 25% find it financially demanding, 90.3% of patients were satisfied with effects of CAMs, and 78.1% would recommend it to other cancer patients. CONCLUSION: Our data showed that in our region, many patients used complementary and alternative methods of treatment. These results are very important because they provide information and give a clearer picture of the use of CAM among cancer patients and, accordingly, the right approach of the health practitioners to the patient, leading to optimized cancer therapy and increased safety.