The effectiveness of platelet supplementation for the reversal of ticagrelor-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation: An in-vitro study.

BACKGROUND: Management of ticagrelor-induced bleeding is challenging, as no antidote is currently available. Platelet transfusion, usually proposed to reverse antiplatelet drugs, has been suggested to be ineffective but few data are available. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of platelet supplementation to restore platelet aggregation inhibited by ticagrelor. DESIGN: In vitro study. SETTING: Blood samples were obtained from the French Blood Bank Institute. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy blood donors. INTERVENTIONS: Whole blood from healthy donors was spiked with ticagrelor or aspirin (used as a positive control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Platelet aggregation was investigated with impedance aggregometry on whole blood [expressed in ohms (V)] and light transmission aggregometry (expressed in %) on platelet-rich plasma using ADP or arachidonic acid as agonists for ticagrelor or aspirin, respectively. Platelet supplementation was defined as the addition of washed platelet suspension increasing at least 60% of whole blood platelet count. RESULTS: Ticagrelor (3.25 mM) inhibited ADP-induced platelet aggregation compared with control either in whole blood (2 vs. 13 V, P < 0.05) or in platelet-rich plasma (15 vs. 75% P < 0.05). Aspirin (25 mM) inhibited arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (1 vs. 7.5 V, P < 0.05 in whole blood and 5 vs. 77.5%, P = 0.01 in platelet-rich plasma). Platelet supplementation completely restored arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation in whole blood (10 vs. 1 V, P = 0.008) and platelet-rich plasma (73 vs. 5%, P < 0.01) in aspirin-treated samples, whereas it failed to correct ADP-induced aggregation (2 vs. 2 V in whole blood and 13.5 vs. 15% in platelet-rich plasma, P > 0.05) in ticagrelor-treated samples. We also report a case of a ticagrelor-treated patient in whom platelet transfusion failed to restore ADP-induced platelet aggregation. CONCLUSION: Platelet supplementation restored platelet aggregation in aspirin-spiked but not in ticagrelor-spiked samples. These results do not support the use of platelet transfusion to reverse the effects of ticagrelor.

Peri-procedural management of dabigatran and rivaroxaban: Duration of anticoagulant discontinuation and drug concentrations.

BACKGROUND: Peri-procedural management of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) is challenging. The optimal duration of pre-procedural discontinuation that guarantees a minimal DOAC concentration ([DOAC]) at surgery is unknown. The usual 48-hour discontinuation might not be sufficient for all patients. OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that a 48-hour DOAC discontinuation is not sufficient to ensure a minimal per-procedural [DOAC], defined as [DOAC]<30ng/mL. To investigate the factors associated with per-procedural [DOAC]. To evaluate the ability of normal PT and aPTT to predict [DOAC]<30ng/mL. METHODS: Patients treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban, and requiring any invasive procedure were included in this multicentre, prospective, observational study. [DOAC], PT and aPTT were measured during invasive procedure. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled. Duration of DOAC discontinuation ranged from 1-168h. Per-procedural [DOAC] ranged from <30 to 466ng/mL. [DOAC]<30ng/mL occurred more frequently after 48-hour discontinuation than after a shorter delay. [DOAC] remained ≥30ng/mL in 36% and 14% of measurements performed 24-48h and 48h-120h after discontinuation, respectively. According to ROC curve, a cut-off value of 120hours for DOAC discontinuation had a better specificity than a cut-off value of 48hours to predict [DOAC]<30ng/mL. Normal PT and aPTT ratios had good specificity and positive predictive value, but limited sensitivity (74%) and negative predictive value (73%) to predict [DOAC]<30ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: A 48-hour discontinuation does not guarantee a [DOAC]<30ng/mL in all patients. Normal PT and aPTT are flawed to predict this threshold and could not replace specific assays. Further studies are needed to define the relationship between per-procedural [DOAC] and clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of recombinant activated factor VII, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: As all anticoagulants, apixaban exposes to a bleeding risk, thus an effective way to reverse its effects is needed. Objectives were to study efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), and fibrinogen concentrate (Fib) to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. METHODS: After a dose-ranging study to assess the minimal amount of apixaban increasing bleeding, 63 anaesthetized rabbits were randomized into 5 groups: control (saline), apixaban (apixaban and saline), rFVIIa (apixaban and rFVIIa), PCC (apixaban and PCC) and fibrinogen (apixaban and Fib). The Folts model was applied: a stenosis and an injury were carried out on the carotid artery, inducing thrombosis detected as cyclic flow reductions (CFRs) within 20 min. A number of parameters were recorded through ear immersion bleeding time (BT), clotting times (CT), thrombelastography, and thrombin generation time (TGT). Ultimately, a hepatosplenic section was performed to evaluate as primary endpoint the blood loss in 15 min. RESULTS: Apixaban increased blood loss (11.6 ± 3 g vs. 8.3 ± 3 g for control, p < 0.0003), lengthened BT, the prothrombin time (PT), thrombelastographic CT and decreased thrombin generation. Only rFVIIa reduced BT yet failed to improve blood loss. PCC and rFVIIa both shortened the PT, CT in thrombelastographic, and lag time in TGT. Fib improved clot firmness, enhanced thrombin generation but increased bleeding. Regarding safety, neither rFVIIa, PCC, nor Fib increased CFRs. CONCLUSION: rFVIIa, PCC, and Fib failed to reverse apixaban-induced bleeding. They only improved several laboratory parameters.

[New anticoagulants]. / Nouveaux anticoagulants.

The range of anticoagulants has been very active recently with the development of new compounds including injectable anti-Xa such as fondaparinux, and new oral drugs which can be divided into anti-IIa with dabigatran, and anti-Xa, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban still in the development stage. Others are coming forward. They are more convenient to use and do not require routine coagulation monitoring. However, several points need to be clarified and the place for each drug remains to be determined. In case of massive bleeding, management is unclear and none of these newer agents has a specific antidote that completely reverses its anticoagulant effect.