Challenging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for leiomyosarcoma of inferior vena cava.

Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava (IVCL) is a rare malignant tumour originating from the smooth muscle cells of the media with intra- or extra-luminal growth. The type of the lesion is further divided into three levels in relation to hepatic and renal veins respectively. The aim of this review was to evaluate the results of surgical treatment of IVCL with special reference to the extent of its histological spread and to analyse the recent literature in order to provide an update on the current concepts of diagnostic and therapeutic management of this entity. IVCL's patients may present with non-specific complaints such as dyspnoea, malaise, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, fever and abdominal pain. Haematogenous metastasis is frequent. At a later stage, IVCL may also spread through lymphatic. Multiple diagnostic imaging techniques have been proposed for accurate preoperative diagnosis, including Doppler ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), individually or in combination with cavography echocardiography or CT-guided biopsy. Despite recent research on the therapeutic strategies against IVCL, surgical resection appears the only potentially curative approach. Unfortunately, a mere minority of patients is eligible to undergo surgical intervention. In addition, surgical removal of IVCL does not necessarily guarantee patient's long-term survival. Alternative therapies, such as radio- and chemo-therapy often proved insufficient. Debate continues regarding the optimal management of the IVC after tumour resection, with primary repair, ligation and IVC reconstruction all have been utilized with varying success.

Rectum sarcoma: challenging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcomas are malignant tumors that arise from mesenchymal tissue at any of the body sites. They incorporate the wide category of GISTs and are classified in various histological types. Histological grading is another indicator of the degree of malignancy, the probability of distant metastases, and survival but remains a poor definition of local recurrence. DISCUSSION: The size and depth of invasion are the most important prognostic factors. Since they grow within the intestinal wall, the symptoms are usually few or late, leading to delays in diagnosis. Most common signs are rectal bleeding, abdominal or anal pain, diarrhea, tenesmus and weight loss. The diagnostic and staging protocol of stromal tumors of the rectum includes mainly endoscopic surveillance, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, rectum sarcoma (RS) consists one of the most biologically virulent cancers and is difficult to cure by conventional procedures. The treatment is primarily surgical, where possible, and should guarantee complete clearance of the tumor, which often requires an aggressive approach. Unfortunately, the minority of patients is eligible to undergo surgical intervention. In addition, surgical removal of RS does not necessarily indicate a patient's long-term recovery. Alternative therapies, such as radio- and chemotherapy, proved insufficient. Elucidation of its molecular basis may prove useful in developing and identifying prognostic biomarkers.