Successful combination of endoscopic and laparoscopic removal of multiple ingested needles: A case report.

RATIONALE: Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a relatively common clinical situation in the emergency department. However, multiple sharply pointed foreign bodies located in different organs are rare conditions and no definite treatment guidelines has been established. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 31-year-old amateur magician visited the outpatient clinic with a chief complaint of epigastric discomfort. He might have accidentally swallowed some needles while practicing a magic trick 2 days before. DIAGNOSIS: Imaging tests revealed 1 needle was stuck in the left liver lobe through the stomach wall, 1 was in the third portion of the duodenum, 3 were in the ascending colon, and 2 were in the transverse colon. INTERVENTIONS: A needle in the duodenum and 5 in the colon were removed by endoscopy. The needle stuck in the liver from the stomach was not visible inside the stomach and was successfully removed by laparoscopy a few days later. OUTCOMES: The patient was able to tolerate an oral diet and was discharged on postoperative day 4 without any complications. LESSONS: Developing a treatment plan in cases of multiple sharp FB may be difficult. A multidisciplinary team of endoscopists and surgeons is needed to determine the best possible treatment plan. This experience illustrates the importance of the planning of the sequence and method of removal of multiple foreign bodies from the gastrointestinal tract.

A Case-control Study on the Risk Factors for Ischemic Colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Ischemic colitis (IC) is a relatively common acute inflammation disorder of the intestine. It was considered to be a disorder of elderly people with risk factors for arteriosclerosis; however, a considerable number of young people with IC have been reported recently. We performed a case-control study to determine the risk factors for IC and compare the risk factors between elderly and non-elderly people. METHODS: The study included 209 consecutive patients diagnosed with IC between December 2004 and March 2017 at Tokai University Hospital. The study also included 209 randomly selected controls in the same calendar year so as to match age and sex. Possible risk factors for IC were identified and compared between age groups. RESULTS: The mean age of IC group was 64.9 with 60 males and 115 elderly patients aged 65 or more in each group. On multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, drinking, abdominal surgery, hypertension, and malignant diseases were risk factors for IC in all ages. In non-elderly patients, only hypertension and laxative/enema use were significant factors, while in elderly, abdominal surgery, hypertension, COPD, malignant disease and antiplatelet drugs were significant. CONCLUSION: The risk factors in elderly people might be quite different from younger ones, while hypertension seemed to be a common risk in all ages.

Tetracycline, metronidazole and amoxicillin-metronidazole combinations in proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are equally effective as alternative therapies against Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: A proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy with clarithromycin (CAM) and amoxicillin (AMPC) is now a standard regimen for Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication in Japan. However, the CAM-resistant rate has increased recently and alternative therapies are sorely needed. Therefore the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the PPI-tetracycline (TC)-metronidazole (MNZ) regimen (the PTM regimen) as an alternative therapy in comparison with the PPI-AMPC-MNZ (PAM) regimen. METHODS: Sixty-four HP-positive patients visiting the HP-eradication clinic in Tokai University Hospital from July 1998 to March 2003 were treated with either PTM or PAM as alternative therapies. The HP eradication was assessed by urea breath test (UBT), HP stool antigen test, or HP culture method more than 2 months after completion of the treatments. The drug resistances against CAM, AMPC, TC, and MNZ were assessed by the agar dilution method. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (26 PTM and 30 PAM) completed medication and evaluation of the eradication. The eradication rates of PTM were 82.8% (24/29) and 92.3% (24/26), while those of PAM were 74.3% (26/35) and 89.7% (26/29) by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis, respectively. The differences between the regimens were not statistically significant. There were no severe adverse effects observed in either of the regimens. The drug-resistance analyses showed 15 CAM- and one MNZ-resistant cases but no TC or AMPC resistance in the available 25 samples. CONCLUSION: The PTM and PAM regimens were equally effective and safe as alternative HP eradication therapies. And PTM would be particularly useful in penicillin allergy cases.