Clinician Care Team Composition and Health Care Utilization.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a greater proportion of physician time on primary care teams are associated with decreased emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, and readmissions, and to determine clinician and care team characteristics associated with greater utilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed administrative data collected from January 1 to December 31, 2017, of 420 family medicine clinicians (253 physicians, 167 nurse practitioners/physician assistants [NP/PAs]) with patient panels in an integrated health system in 59 Midwestern communities serving rural and urban areas in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Iowa. These clinicians cared for 419,581 patients through 110 care teams, with varying numbers of physicians and NP/PAs. Primary outcome measures were rates of ED visits, hospitalizations, and readmissions. RESULTS: The proportion of physician full-time equivalents on the team was unrelated to rates of ED visits (rate ratio [RR] = 0.826; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.624 to 1.063), hospitalizations (RR = 0.894; 95% CI, 0.746 to 1.072), or readmissions (RR = -0.026; 95% CI, 0.364 to 0.312). In separate multivariable models adjusted for clinician and practice-level characteristics, the rate of ED visits was positively associated with mean panel hierarchical condition category (HCC) score, urban vs rural setting, NP/PA vs physician, and lower years in practice. The rate of inpatient admissions was associated with HCC score, and 30-day hospital readmissions were positively associated with HCC score, lower years in practice, and male clinicians. CONCLUSION: Care team physician and NP/PA composition was not independently related to utilization. More complex panels had higher rates of ED visits, hospitalization, and readmissions. Statistically significant differences between physician and NP/PA panels were only evident for ED visits.

Association of Primary Care Team Composition and Clinician Burnout in a Primary Care Practice Network.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of the emotional exhaustion domain of burnout with care team composition in a Midwestern primary care practice network. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We studied 420 family medicine clinicians (253 physicians and 167 nurse practitioners/physician assistants [NP/PAs]) within a large integrated health system throughout 59 Midwestern communities. The observational cross-sectional study utilized a single-question clinician self-assessment of the emotional exhaustion domain of burnout on a scale of 0 (never) to 6 (daily) conducted between March 1 and April 2, 2018, and administrative data collected between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017. We used a multivariable linear mixed model for data analysis, adjusted for clinical- and team-level factors, including clinician sex, panel size and complexity, clinician type (physician or NP/PA), clinician full-time equivalent (FTE), total care team panel size, and number of clinicians on the care team. RESULTS: Among 217 survey respondents (51.7%), the median frequency of the emotional exhaustion domain of burnout was once per week. Adjusted analyses revealed that a greater proportion of physician FTE on the care team was associated with a lower emotional exhaustion domain of burnout among individual clinicians (P=.05). Female clinicians had a higher emotional exhaustion domain of burnout than male clinicians (P=.05). None of the other variables in the model were associated with emotional exhaustion. CONCLUSION: Primary care teams containing both physicians and NP/PAs had lower levels of emotional exhaustion with increasing proportion of physician FTE. More work is needed to explore what other variables may be associated with burnout in primary care team-based practices.

Treating pediatric conjunctivitis without an exam: An evaluation of outcomes and antibiotic usage.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this research paper is to compare antibiotic treatment, follow-up rates, and types of follow-up encounters among eVisits, phone calls, and in-person encounters for pediatric conjunctivitis. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review of pediatric patients evaluated for conjunctivitis between May 1, 2016 and May 1, 2017, was performed. A total of 101 eVisits, 202 in-person retail clinic visits, and 202 nurse phone calls for conjunctivitis were manually reviewed for outcomes. Exclusion criteria included previous encounter for conjunctivitis in the past 14 days, treatment with an oral antibiotic at the initial encounter, or patient outside Minnesota at the time of encounter. Comparison among the three encounter types with regard to follow-up rates, follow-up encounter type within 14 days of initial evaluation, and prescribing rates was performed. RESULTS: Patients completing non-face-to-face encounters were significantly more likely to have follow-up care (34.6% and 45.5%) than those who had a face-to-face visit at the retail clinic (7.4%), p ≤ 0.0001. Patients initially evaluated by eVisit were more likely to have follow-up at the retail clinic while patients initially evaluated by phone call were more likely to have follow-up in their primary care office. Treatment rates with antibiotics were significantly higher in phone call encounters (41.6%) than in eVisits (25.7%) or face-to-face encounters (19.8%), p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Non-face-to-face visits have significantly higher rates of follow-up when compared to face-to-face encounters. Antibiotic prescribing is greater with phone call triage encounters; however, there was no significant difference in antibiotic prescribing rates between eVisits and face-to-face visits. Follow-up type varied according to site of initial encounter.

Vitamin D and the Breastfeeding Infant: Family Medicine Clinicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices.

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Academy of Medicine recommend vitamin D supplementation for breastfeeding infants. However, compliance with this recommendation is poor. Maternal supplementation with vitamin D is a safe and effective alternative to achieving vitamin D sufficiency in breastfeeding infants, and mothers have indicated a preference for self-supplementation over infant supplementation. Research aim: We sought to explore Family Medicine clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding vitamin D supplementation recommendations for breastfeeding dyads. METHODS: Fifty-six Family Medicine clinicians (including faculty physicians, resident physicians, and nurse practitioners/physician assistants) completed an online, anonymous survey regarding their knowledge and practices concerning vitamin D supplementation for breastfeeding infants. RESULTS: The vast majority of clinicians (92.9%) correctly identified the American Academy of Pediatrics' 2008 recommended dose for vitamin D supplementation in breastfeeding infants and estimated recommending vitamin D supplementation of exclusively breastfeeding infants 70.1% of the time. If all options were equivalent, clinicians would prefer to offer maternal or infant supplementation (50%) or maternal supplementation (37.5%) over infant supplementation (12.5%). Most (69.6%) preferred daily over monthly supplementation regimens. CONCLUSION: Family Medicine clinicians are knowledgeable regarding current recommendations for vitamin D supplementation in breastfeeding infants. They are also open to recommending maternal supplementation or offering parents a choice of maternal or infant vitamin supplementation.

Maternal Preferences for Vitamin D Supplementation in Breastfed Infants.

Daily vitamin D supplementation is recommended for breastfed infants, but alternative methods include enriching breast milk with vitamin D through maternal supplementation or intermittent high-dose vitamin D. We determined maternal preferences for vitamin D supplementation in 140 mothers with exclusively breastfed infants, and 44 who used both breast and formula milk. Only 101 (55%) supplemented their infants with vitamin D. One hundred sixty (88%) preferred supplementing themselves rather than their infants, and 102 (57%) preferred daily to monthly supplementation. Safety was most important in choosing a method of supplementation. Taking maternal preferences into consideration may improve adequate intakes of vitamin D in breastfed infants.

Future complexity of care tier affected by depression outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The inclusion of mental health issues in the evaluation of multimorbidity generally has been as the presence or absence of the condition rather than severity, complexity, or stage. The hypothesis for this study was that clinical outcome of the depression 6 months after enrollment into collaborative care management would have a role in predicting future complexity of care tier. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review of 1894 primary care patients who were diagnosed with major depressive disorder or dysthymia as of December 2012. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to test the independent associations between each variable and the odds of being included in the higher tiers (HT) group. RESULTS: Age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.022, confidence interval [CI] = 1.013-1.030, P < .001), female gender (OR = 1.380, CI = 1.020-1.868, P = .037), being married (OR = 0.730, CI = 0.563-0.947, P = .018), and the presence of comorbidities (1, OR = 1.986, CI = 1.485-2.656, P < .001; ≥ 2, OR = 4.678, CI = 3.242-6.750, P < .001) were independently associated with future HT levels. The presence of persistent depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10) at 6 months conferred 2.280 (CI = 1.673-3.107, P < .001) times likely odds of HT level compared with clinical remission at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Patients with the diagnosis of major depression or dysthymia had greater odds of complex tier levels in the future, if depression was not treated to remission by 6 months. This study demonstrated the importance of the goal of significant improvement (ie, remission) of depression symptoms by 6 months (especially those older patients with more comorbidity) from entering into the higher complexity tiers.