The impact of interval between primary cytoreductive surgery with bowel resection and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival of women with advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine if the time interval between bowel resection and initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy impacts survival in advanced ovarian cancers. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from two cancer centers, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center in Seoul, South Korea. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV ovarian cancer that underwent large bowel resection during primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) were included. RESULTS: Ninety-one women were eligible of which the majority (90.1%) were diagnosed with high-grade serous cancer. The median interval from PCS to chemotherapy for all patients was 21 days (7-86 days). Patients were stratified into 3 groups: 1) Interval ≤14 days, 32 (35.2%) patients; 2) Interval between 15-28 days, 27 (29.6%) patients; and 3) Interval between 29-90 days, 32 (35.2%) patients. Surgical procedures and postoperative outcomes were similar between groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that PCS to chemotherapy interval of 2-4 weeks, younger age, and completion of 4 or more adjuvant chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors of favorable overall survival. CONCLUSION: Initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy between 2 to 4 weeks after PCS with bowel resection may improve survival outcomes in women with advanced ovarian cancer by maximizing the benefit of PCS plus adjuvant chemotherapy.

Oncologic outcomes and morbidity following heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy at cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has not been universally adopted at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) despite evidence of a 12-month overall survival (OS) benefit in a recent landmark randomized trial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity following HIPEC among primary EOC patients. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, from inception to August 2019, for observational and randomized studies of primary EOC patients undergoing HIPEC. We assessed risk of bias using the Institute of Health Economics Quality Appraisal Checklist for single-arm cohort studies, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for comparative cohort studies, and Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for randomized trials. We qualitatively summarized survival outcomes and calculated the pooled proportion of 30-day grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death. RESULTS: We identified 35 articles including 2252 primary EOC patients; one study was a randomized trial, and only six studies included a comparator group of surgery alone. The timing, temperature, and chemotherapeutic agents used for HIPEC differed across studies. Reported OS was highly variable (3-year OS range: 46-77%); three comparative cohort studies and the sole randomized trial reported statistically significant survival benefits for HIPEC over surgery alone, while two comparative cohort studies did not. The pooled proportions for grade III-IV morbidity and postoperative death at 30 days were 34% (95% CI 20-52) and 0% (95% CI 0-5) respectively. CONCLUSION: One randomized trial suggests that HIPEC at time of interval cytoreductive surgery should be considered in patients with primary EOC. However, there is significant heterogeneity in literature with respect to an appropriate HIPEC regimen, short- and long-term outcomes. High-quality prospective randomized trials are urgently needed to clarify the role of HIPEC in the first-line treatment of primary EOC.

Indications for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cytoreductive surgery: a systematic review.

The purpose of the present review was to describe evidence-based indications for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), with cytoreductive surgery (CRS), in patients with a diagnosis of mesothelioma, appendiceal (including appendiceal mucinous neoplasm), colorectal, gastric, ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Relevant studies were identified from a systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE search of studies published from 1985 to 2019. Studies were included if they were RCTs. If no RCTs were identified, prospective and retrospecctive comparative studies (where confounders are controlled for studies with greater than 30 patients) were included. Overall survival, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, adverse events and quality of life data were extracted. For patients with newly diagnosed, primary stage III epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma, HIPEC with CRS should be considered for those with at least stable disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the time of interval CRS if complete or optimal cytoreduction is achieved. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the addition of HIPEC when primary CRS is performed for patients with newly diagnosed, primary advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma or in those with recurrent ovarian cancer outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS for the prevention of or for the treatment of peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS for the prevention of or for the treatment of gastric peritoneal carcinomatosis outside of a clinical trial. There is insufficient evidence to recommend HIPEC with CRS in patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma or in those with disseminated mucinous neoplasm in the appendix as a standard of care; however, these patients should be referred to HIPEC specialty centres for assessment for treatment as part of an ongoing research protocol.

The lysosomal transport of prosaposin requires the conditional interaction of its highly conserved d domain with sphingomyelin.

Lysosomal prosaposin (65 kDa) is a nonenzymic protein that is transported to the lysosomes in a mannose 6-phosphate-independent manner. Selective deletion of the functional domains of prosaposin indicates that the D domain and the carboxyl-terminal region are necessary for its transport to the lysosomes. Inhibitors of sphingolipid biosynthesis, such as fumonisin B(1) (FB(1)) and tricyclodecan-9-yl xanthate potassium salt (D609), also interfere with the trafficking of prosaposin to lysosomes. In this study, we examine sphingomyelin as a direct candidate for the trafficking of prosaposin. Chinese hamster ovary and COS-7 cells overexpressing prosaposin or an albumin/prosaposin construct were incubated with these inhibitors, treated with sphingolipids, and then immunostained. Sphingomyelin restored the immunostaining in lysosomes in both FB(1)- and D609-treated cells and ceramide reestablished the immunostaining in FB(1)-treated cells only. D-Threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PDMP), which inhibits glycosphingolipids, had no effect on the immunostaining pattern. To determine whether sphingomyelin has the same effect on the transport of endogenous prosaposin, testicular explants were treated with FB(1) and D609. Sphingomyelin restored prosaposin immunogold labeling in the lysosomes of FB(1)- and D609-treated Sertoli cells, whereas ceramide restored the label in FB(1) treatment only. Albumin linked to the D and COOH-terminal domains of prosaposin was used as a dominant negative competitor. The construct blocked the targeting of prosaposin and induced accumulation of membrane in the lysosomes, demonstrating that the construct uses the same transport pathway as endogenous prosaposin. In conclusion, our results showed that sphingomyelin, the D domain, and its adjacent COOH-terminal region play a crucial role in the transport of prosaposin to lysosomes. Although the precise nature of this lipid-protein interaction is not well established, it is proposed that sphingomyelin microdomains (lipid rafts) are part of a mechanism ensuring correct intercellular trafficking of prosaposin.