Feasibility and Safety of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resected Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Renal Insufficiency: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data from Five Japanese Large-scale Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The incidence of chemotherapy-related adverse events in colorectal cancer patients with renal insufficiency has been compared to patients with normal renal function in only a few studies. The purpose of this analysis was to verify the feasibility and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for postoperative colorectal cancer patients with renal insufficiency. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adverse events and discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with curatively resected locally advanced colorectal cancer were examined using a combined database of individual patient data obtained from five large-scale clinical trials (n=4,106). The renal function of patients was classified into Level (L) 1-2: ≥60 ml/min and L3-4: <60 ml/min. RESULTS: As Grade 3 adverse events, hematological toxicities, such as neutropenia and anemia, and gastrointestinal disorders, such as diarrhea and vomiting, were significantly more frequent in the L3-4 group. Moreover, the time-to-treatment discontinuation in the L3-4 group was higher (hazard ratio=1.21, p=0.0012). T factor, N factor, and creatinine clearance level were found to be independent risk factors for the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy. In the subgroup analysis of FOLFOX, neutropenia and diarrhea were significantly common in the L3-4 group, but neurotoxicities were not different. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation of adjuvant FOLFOX. CONCLUSION: Adverse events of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected colorectal cancer were associated with renal insufficiencies. Since adverse events have the potential to shorten the duration of treatment, especially when using chemotherapy without oxaliplatin, careful management, including dose reduction, may be important in patients with renal insufficiency.

The clinical impacts of postoperative complications after colon cancer surgery for the clinical course of adjuvant treatment and survival.

AIM: We investigated whether or not postoperative complications (POCs) themselves have a negative survival impact or indirectly worsen the survival due to insufficient adjuvant chemotherapy in a pooled analysis of two large phase III studies performed in Japan PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study examined the patients who enrolled in 1304, phase III study comparing the efficacy of 6 and 12 months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer patients and in 882, a phase III study to confirm the tolerability of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and l-leucovorin in Japanese stage II/III colon cancer patients. In our study, POCs were defined as the following major surgical complications: anastomotic leakage, pneumonia, bowel obstruction/ileus, surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding, urinary tract infection, and fistula. Patients were classified as those with POCs (C group) and those without POCs (NC group). RESULTS: A total of 2095 patients were examined in the present study. POCs were observed in 169 patients (8.1%). The overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years after surgery were 75.3% in the C group and 86.5% in the NC group (p = 0.0017). The hazard ratio of POCs for the OS in multivariate analysis was 1.70 (95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 2.45; p = 0.0040). The time to adjuvant treatment failure (TTF) of adjuvant chemotherapy was similar between the groups, being 68.6% in the C group and 67.1% in the NC group for the 6-month continuation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. The dose reduction rate of adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant treatment suspension rate were also similar between the groups (C vs. NC groups: 45.0% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.3520; and 52.7% vs. 55.0%, p = 0.5522, respectively). CONCLUSION: POCs were associated with a poor prognosis but did not affect the intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy. These results suggested that POCs themselves negatively influence the survival.

Thyroid and Parathyroid Functions After Pharyngo-Laryngo-Esophagectomy for Cervical Esophageal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) patients whose larynx function cannot be preserved often undergo chemoradiotherapy, whereas those with residual or recurrent lesions undergo a pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy (PLE); however, some need to undergo a pharyngolaryngectomy with total esophagectomy (PLTE) for synchronous or metachronous esophageal cancer. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between preoperative irradiation (or the extent of esophageal resection) and postoperative endocrine complications in CEC, including hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism. METHODS: The cancers of 35 (5.4%) of 678 esophageal cancer patients with esophagectomy treated in 2000-2017 were CECs. We also analyzed the 17 cases of CEC patients who underwent PLE with thyroid lobectomy-11 with irradiation before PLE and 6 without irradiation. Seven patients underwent a PLTE. RESULTS: Hypothyroidism and hypoparathyroidism occurred in 14 and 12 patients, respectively. The hypothyroidism rate was significantly higher in patients with irradiation versus those without irradiation (100% vs. 50%; p = 0.010), and the hypoparathyroidism rate was significantly higher in the PLTE versus non-PLTE patients (100% vs. 50%; p = 0.026). The mean levothyroxine dosage was 1.60 µg/kg/day in the PLE patients post-irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation appears to be a risk factor for hypothyroidism after PLE with thyroid lobectomy, while PLTE might have some effect on hypoparathyroidism. Due to vocal function loss, PLE patients may experience symptoms from endocrine complications. Levothyroxine treatment soon after PLE for post-irradiation patients and patients requiring as-needed calcium or vitamin D supplementation based on biochemical hypocalcemia for PLE (especially PLTE), may be effective in preventing symptomatic endocrine complications.

The Benefits of Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Induction Therapy in Conversion to Curative Treatment for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT), used for treatment of patients with an initial diagnosis of unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer, has led to unsatisfactory long-term prognosis. Moreover, CRT can lead to esophageal fistula, perforation, and strictures. Therefore, strong induction chemotherapeutic treatments are necessary to reduce the tumor volume for subsequent radical esophagectomy. This study aimed to determine the oncological utility of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and the technical feasibility of subsequent esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients with clinical borderline unresectable T3 and T4 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma without distant metastases were included in this study. There were 44 patients in primary DCF group and 43 patients in definitive CRT group, and perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (50%) achieved R0 resection in the DCF group. Albeit not significant, the rate of curative treatment was higher in the DCF group than the definitive CRT group (p = 0.099). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were better with DCF than with definitive CRT (median OS, 29 vs. 17 months, p = 0.206; median PFS, 10 vs. 6 months, p = 0.020). Specifically, the OS of patients with a Charlson score of less than 3 among the DCF-treated patients tended to be better than those among the definitive CRT-treated patients. CONCLUSION: DCF and subsequent esophagectomy achieved R0 resection in 50% of the patients and was associated with better long-term oncological outcomes in patients with initially unresectable esophageal cancer if their systemic status is acceptable.

Risk Factors for Peritoneal Recurrence in Stage II to III Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Most previous reports to analyze risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients with colon cancer have been observational studies of a population-based cohort. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients with stage II to III colon cancer who underwent curative resection. DESIGN: This was a pooled analysis using a combined database obtained from 3 large phase III randomized trials (N = 3714). SETTINGS: Individual patient data were collected from the Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer clinical trials 7, 15, and 33, which evaluated the benefits of postoperative 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapies in patients with locally advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS: We included patients who had stage II to III colon cancer and underwent curative resection with over D2 lymph node dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Main outcomes measured were risk factors for peritoneal recurrence without other organ metastasis after curative surgery. RESULTS: Peritoneal recurrence occurred in 2.3% (86/3714) of all patients undergoing curative resection. Mean duration from operation to peritoneal recurrence was 17.0 ± 10.3 months. Of these patients with peritoneal recurrence, 29 patients (34%) had recurrence in ≥1 other organ. Multivariate analysis showed that age (≥60 y: HR = 0.531; p = 0.0182), pathological T4 (HR = 3.802; p < 0.0001), lymph node involvement (HR = 3.491; p = 0.0002), and lymphadenectomy (D2: HR = 1.801; p = 0.0356) were independent predictors of peritoneal recurrence. The overall survival was lower in patients who developed peritoneal recurrence than in those with other recurrence (HR = 1.594; p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: The regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy were limited to oral 5-fluorouracil. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings clarified the risk factors for peritoneal recurrence in patients who underwent curative resection for colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A609.