Vitamin D Deficiency Is Highly Prevalent in Critically Ill Patients and a Risk Factor for Mortality: A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Noncirrhotic Patients and Patients With Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: A 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D, deficiency is common among critically ill patients and correlated with increased mortality. Furthermore, deficiency is associated with advanced liver disease. However, there are no studies available comparing the dimensions and consequences of a 25(OH)D deficiency between patients with and without liver cirrhosis in the setting of intensive care units (ICUs). This study focuses on differences in 25(OH)D status between critically ill noncirrhosis patients and patients with cirrhosis (primary end point), hypothesizing that deficiency and its impact on mortality risk are even more pronounced in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study of 176 patients (noncirrhosis patients, N = 114; patients with cirrhosis, N = 62) with a laboratory assessment of 25(OH)D on ICU admission and survival analyses after 180 days. RESULTS: On admission, 55% of patients showed a severe deficiency, 25(OH)D <10 ng/mL, and a further 23% moderate deficiency (10-19 ng/mL). The overall median level of 25(OH)D was 8.0 (5.0-18.0) ng/mL (10.5 [6.0-21.3] in noncirrhosis patients vs 7.0 [4.8-10.0] in patients with cirrhosis; P < .001). We found extremely low levels particularly in patients without prior vitamin D supplementation (6.0 [4.0-7.5] in patients with cirrhosis vs 8.0 [5.0-12.0] ng/mL in noncirrhosis patients; P = .004). Vitamin D status correlated inversely with the sequential organ failure assessment, acute and physiology chronic health evaluation, model of end-stage liver disease, and Child-Pugh scores. Survival analyses categorized 25(OH)D levels <10 ng/mL as a high-risk factor for mortality 180 days after admission (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.70; P < .001). In patients with cirrhosis, a severe deficiency (<10 ng/mL) involved a significantly higher mortality risk than in noncirrhosis patients (HR: 2.30, 95% CI = 1.39-3.82; P = .001). In cases of admission levels ≥10 ng/mL, however, mortality risk was similar between patients with cirrhosis and noncirrhosis patients (HR: 1.08, 95% CI = 0.43-2.73; P = .873). CONCLUSIONS: Hypovitaminosis D is a highly frequent disorder in critically ill patients admitted to ICU. A severe deficiency with levels <10 ng/mL is a high risk factor for increased mortality, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Influence of Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis Treatment on Isavuconazole Plasma Levels in Critically Ill Patients.

Isavuconazole plasma concentrations were measured before and after sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) treatment in 22 critically ill adult patients with probable invasive aspergillosis and underlying hematological malignancies. Isavuconazole levels were significantly lower after SLED treatment (5.73 versus 3.36 µg/ml; P < 0.001). However, even after SLED treatment, isavuconazole concentrations exceeded the in vivo MICs for several relevant Aspergillus species.

Dissociating task-set selection from task-set inhibition in the prefrontal cortex.

Patients with focal lesions in the left (n=7) and right (n=4) prefrontal cortex were compared with controls (n=16) in a task-switching experiment using four different, simple spatial tasks. Each of these tasks involved a left-right decision, either regarding an arrow, the word "left" or "right," a circle position, or the direction of a moving line. We compared performance on trials that required rule switches versus rule repetitions (local switch costs) and we compared performance between blocks with bivalent stimuli (two dimensions present) and blocks with univalent stimuli (only one dimension present) to assess global switch costs. Patients with left prefrontal lesions, but not patients with right prefrontal lesions, exhibited increased costs on trials in which the relevant dimension switched (local switch costs), but also on no-switch trials with bivalent stimuli (global costs). We also assessed task-set inhibition in the form of the backward-inhibition effect [increased response times to recently abandoned tasks; Mayr, U., & Keele, S. Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4-26, 2000]. Although left frontal patients showed normal inhibition, right frontal patients showed no evidence for inhibition. These results suggest a neurocognitive dissociation between task-set selection and inhibition.