Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila) ; 10(11): 671-679, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851689

RESUMO

Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2, PGI2) overproduction in FVB/N mice prevents the formation of carcinogen and tobacco smoke-induced adenomas, and administration of the oral prostacyclin analogue iloprost to wild-type mice also prevented carcinogen-induced mouse lung adenoma formation. Former smokers taking oral iloprost showed improved bronchial dysplasia histology compared with placebo. Next-generation oral prostacyclin analogues, like treprostinil, were developed for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). On the basis of our prior studies with iloprost, we performed preclinical studies examining the ability of treprostinil to chemoprevent urethane-induced murine lung adenocarcinoma. We determined the MTD in chow (prior studies had delivered treprostinil by gavage), and this dose produced serum levels in the experimental animals similar to those found in PAH patients treated with treprostinil. We then examined the chemopreventive efficacy of treprostinil exposure initiated both before (1 week) and after (6 weeks) urethane exposure to better model chemoprevention studies conducted in former smokers. Neither of these dosing strategies prevented murine lung cancer; however, we did detect changes in pulmonary inflammatory cell infiltrate and expression of CXCR4 (a chemokine receptor previously shown to increase in response to treprostinil exposure) in tumor-bearing, treprostinil-treated animals, indicating that the drug was bioavailable. One potential explanation stems from iloprost and treprostinil differentially activating cell surface prostaglandin receptors and intracellular peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. When murine lung tumor cells were treated with treprostinil, their proliferation rate increased; in contrast, iloprost had no effect on proliferation. Future investigations comparing these two agents will provide insight into iloprost's chemopreventive mechanisms. Cancer Prev Res; 10(11); 671-9. ©2017 AACR.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/prevenção & controle , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Epoprostenol/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias Experimentais/prevenção & controle , Adenocarcinoma/induzido quimicamente , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão , Animais , Disponibilidade Biológica , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Proliferação de Células/efeitos dos fármacos , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos , Epoprostenol/farmacologia , Epoprostenol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/citologia , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Pulmão/patologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/induzido quimicamente , Camundongos , Camundongos Transgênicos , Neoplasias Experimentais/induzido quimicamente , Receptores CXCR4/metabolismo , Receptores de Prostaglandina/metabolismo , Resultado do Tratamento , Uretana/toxicidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA