RESUMO
Despite the advances in operative management, displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIAFCs) are often associated with long term sequelae, permanent disability, a considerable reduction in quality of life, and a high socio-economic cost. Randomized controlled trials have shown that patient reported outcomes of surgery are no better than those of nonoperative management. Methodological flaws and selection bias may have influenced the results, however, and subgroup analysis showed that some patients could benefit from surgery, whilst patients' preference can be the decisive factor in choosing a management modality. Fractures with significant lateral wall displacement predisposing to impingements often require surgery, and management has to be individualized and tailored to the patient. Surgery does not usually achieve excellent results, though it exposes the patient to potential risks and complications. Wound healing problems and infections affect around 20% of patients when the extensile lateral approach has been used. Sinus tarsi approach and minimally invasive surgery may be viable alternatives, offering similar results with fewer wound complications, but most of the available studies are of low to moderate quality. Late subtalar joint arthrodesis is often required: however, such procedure would be less technically difficult and could result in better foot function should the shape of the calcaneus have been anatomically restored with surgery in the acute phase.