The immediate effects of passive hip joint mobilization on hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in patients with anterior knee pain and impaired hip function. A randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Background: Anterior knee pain (AKP) is often associated with persistent hip muscle weakness and facilitatory interventions may be beneficial for managing patients with AKP (pwAKP). Physiotherapists often employ passive oscillatory hip joint mobilizations to increase hip muscle function. However, there is little information about their effectiveness and the mechanisms of action involved. Objectives: To investigate the immediate effects of passive hip joint mobilization on eccentric hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in pwAKP with impaired hip function. Design: A double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover design. Method: Eighteen patients with AKP participated in two sessions of data collection with one week apart. They received passive hip joint mobilization or placebo mobilization in a randomized order. Eccentric hip muscle strength was measured immediately before and after each intervention using a portable hand-held dynamometer. Results: An ANCOVA with the sequence of treatment condition as the independent variable, the within-subject post-treatment differences as the dependent variable and the within-subject pre-treatment differences as the covariate was conducted. Patients showed a significant mean increase in eccentric hip muscle strength of 7.73% (p = 0.001) for the mobilization condition, compared to a mean decrease of 4.22% for the placebo condition. Seventeen out of eighteen participants reported having no pain during any of the strength testing. Conclusion: These data suggest that passive hip joint mobilization has an immediate positive effect on eccentric hip abductor/external rotator muscle strength in pwAKP with impaired hip function, even in the absence of current pain.

Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The effects of motor control training with pressure biofeedback on neck pain and disability of patients with neck pain is a field that has drawn a lot of research interest. Therefore, the aim of this study was to conduct, for the first time, a systematic review and meta-analysis for examining whether motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain. METHODS: The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. The databases PubMED, MEDLINE, EBSCOhost, Google scholar, SportDiscus, COCHRANE and EMBASE were searched for studies related to the research question. PEDro scale was used for examining methodological quality. A random effects model was used for data meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were included for qualitative synthesis and 10 were selected for further quantitative synthesis. Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback was found to have equal or better effectiveness on neck pain intensity and disability in comparison to other control interventions. The meta-analyses show that motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback is more effective than strength-endurance training of cervical muscles for improving pain (Hedges' g = 0.323, 95% CI 0.04-0.60, I2 = 50.94%) and disability (Hedges g = 0.401, 95% CI 0.12-0.68, I2 = 53.44%) in patients with neck pain. CONCLUSIONS: Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback is an effective intervention for improving pain intensity and disability in patients with neck pain and preferable to strength-endurance training of cervical muscles.