Demonstrating the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma and Prolotherapy treatments in knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma(PRP) and prolotherapy(PRL) are regenerative treatment approaches in the knee osteoarthritis (KOA). AIM: To see how efficient PRP and PRL are in treating KOA. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with a diagnosis of KOA who received either PRL, PRP, or exercise therapy and whose 3-month follow-up data were available were included in this retrospective study (PRL n = 35 or PRP n = 35, exercise n = 38). Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) and The Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index(WOMAC) were used as outcome measures at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the three groups in terms of demographic parameters, baseline assessments of pain intensity, or WOMAC scores. At the first and third months, all groups showed a substantial improvement in the VAS activity, resting and WOMAC values as compared to before treatment(p < 0.05). When the groups were compared, the VAS activity, resting, and WOMAC values in PRP and PRL improved significantly in the first and third months compared to the exercise group. At one month, there was a statistically significant improvement in VAS activity and WOMAC pain and total scores compared to PRP and PRL, but this improvement was not significant at 3 months. CONCLUSION: Pain and disability were significantly improved with PRL and PRP compared with exercise therapy. Although PRP is more effective than PRL in the first month after treatment, PRL may be preferred due to its low cost, long-term efficacy, and low complication rates due to the periarticular application.

Effect of dry-needling and exercise treatment on myofascial trigger point: A single-blind randomized controlled trial.

AIM: To investigate the effectiveness of dry-needling(DN) together with exercise therapy on pain, ultrasonographic parameters of myofascial trigger points(MTrPs), and upper trapezius(UT) muscles, and neck disability in patients with myofascial pain syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-blind, prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. Participants aged 18-45 years with persistent neck pain for >3 months caused by the active MTrPs in the UT muscles were included. The exercise therapy was performed 3 times/week for 3 months. DN therapy was applied once a week, for a total of three sessions. The pain intensity, ultrasonographic measurements of the thickness of the UT muscle, and diameter of the MTrPs in the UT muscle were the primary outcomes. The secondary outcome was the neck disability. RESULTS: Seventy participants were randomized into two groups: the dry-needling together with exercise group(DNG, n = 35) and the exercise-only group(EG, n = 35). A total of 8 participants dropped out of the study, and the study was completed with 62 participants(DNG = 33; EG = 29). There was a significant difference in terms of VAS(at night, at rest, and during activity)(p < 0.001) at post-treatment and after 3 months, the thickness of UT muscle(p = 0.004), and diameter of MTrP(p = 0.021) at post-treatment between the groups. No statistical differences were identified in terms of NDI(p = 0.065). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the effects of DN applied together with exercise therapy on reduction of the pain intensity at short(post-treatment) and mid-term(after 3 months), and the ultrasonographic parameters of MTrPs and UT muscles at short-term(post-treatment).

The comparative effects of spinal manipulation, myofascial release and exercise in tension-type headache patients with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of two manual treatment methods on pain, disability, and pressure pain threshold (PPT) in tension-type headache (TTH) patients with and neck pain. METHODS: Forty-five patients with TTH were randomly assigned to one of three groups and received eight sessions treatment: manipulation plus exercise (manipulation), suboccipital inhibition plus exercise (myofascial release), and exercise only (control). Headache frequency, pain severity (VAS-headache, VAS-neck pain) and headache and neck disability (HIT-6 and NDI, respectively) were measured at baseline, posttreatment, and at the third month follow-up. PPT was also evaluated on the temporalis muscle. RESULTS: Manipulation group was statistically better than myofascial release group in terms of headache frequency, headache severity, and PPT scores. Also, manipulation group showed statistically significant improvements in all outcome criteria when compared control group. CONCLUSIONS: Manipulation and exercise, in addition to pharmacologic treatment in TTH patients with cervical dysfunction appear to be a promising approach.