RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Understanding the prevalence of guideline non-adherence among patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) and its impact on survival may facilitate increased adherence. Our objective was to perform a detailed analysis of overall National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) guideline adherence in a national cohort. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database, we analyzed site-specific NCCN guideline adherence for treatment of 100,074 overall stage III and IVA HNC patients from 2004 to 2013. Main outcomes were guideline adherence rates and overall survival (OS). Adherence was categorized by treatment: surgery/ radiation. Reasons were categorized as: (1) high risk; (2) refusal; (3) not planned. RESULTS: After exclusion, the care of 25,620 patients was defined as non-adherent (25.6%), yet adherence rates significantly improved across the study's years. After multivariate analysis, non-adherence was associated with age ≥ 65, female gender, black race, comorbidity score ≥ 1, insurance status, clinical staging, primary site, and facility type. Patients not managed according to NCCN guidelines had a significantly reduced OS compared with patients treated on-guideline (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.51 (95 %CI 1.48-1.54), p < 0.001). 'Not planned' patients had reduced OS when compared to adherent patients (HR = 1.27 (95 %CI 1.23-1.30), p < 0.001). Off-guideline treated patients due to 'risk factors' had a decrease in overall survival (OS) compared with other reasons (p < 0.001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvement over time, non-adherence to NCCN guidelines for advanced stage HNC remains high. Non-adherence is associated with decreased OS, regardless of the reason. Despite concerns from both patient and physician, efforts should be made to increase guideline awareness and adherence.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , População Negra , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/terapia , Humanos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Background: In the past two decades, new evidence and guidelines have emerged to refine recommendations for the use of radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy after thyroidectomy for cancer. We aim to describe national trends in RAI utilization, assess the impact of individual hospitals on RAI utilization, and examine whether variation in prescribing habits has declined over time. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2016 for patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) who received total thyroidectomy. Trends were analyzed using Joinpoint analysis. Hospital-specific effects and variation in prescribing habits were assessed through a hierarchical, mixed regression model. Results: RAI utilization declined from 61.0% in 2004 to 43.9% in 2016. RAI use declined most profoundly in patients with T1a, N0/X, M0 PTC without extrathyroidal extension (34.8% in 2004 to 9.5% in 2015), but continues to be used commonly in patients with advanced disease for whom it is routinely recommended (73.4% in 2004 to 72.0% in 2015). Furthermore, â¼80% of hospitals in 2016 utilized at or below the median utilization rate in 2006. Variation in RAI utilization across hospitals decreased by â¼50% from 2004 to 2016 (Levene's test p < 0.001), with a significant decline (p = 0.002) in the variation after 2012 (confidence interval: 2010 to 2014). Conclusions: Recommendations for whom to prescribe RAI appear to have impacted both the number of patients receiving RAI and the variation in prescribing habits across hospitals. Hospital selection has contributed less to the probability of receiving RAI over time.
Assuntos
Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Radio-Oncologistas/tendências , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/radioterapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hábitos , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo/efeitos adversos , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Câncer Papilífero da Tireoide/patologia , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To characterize the representation of women in clinical trials directing the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for chemotherapy use in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), as well as the relationship between gender and chemotherapy administration in the definitive treatment of HNSCC in the United States. METHODS: A review of all HNSCC chemotherapy clinical trials cited by the 2018 NCCN guidelines was performed. Sex-based proportions were compared with the corresponding proportions in the general U.S. population of patients with HNSCC between 1985 and 2015, derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. A second analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), identified 63,544 adult patients diagnosed with stages III-IVB HNSCC between 2004 and 2014 and treated with definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of chemotherapy administration. RESULTS: While women comprised 26.2% of U.S. patients with HNSCC between 1985 and 2015, they comprised only 17.0% of patients analyzed in U.S. NCCN-cited chemotherapy clinical trials between 1985 and 2017. On multivariable analysis, women had decreased odds of receiving chemotherapy (Odds Ratio [OR]: 0.875; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.821-0.931; pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSION: Women are underrepresented in HNSCC chemotherapy clinical trials cited by the national guidelines. Additionally, women are less likely than men to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy as oppose to definitive radiotherapy. Reasons for these disparities warrant further investigation as well as re-evaluation of eligibility criteria and enrollment strategies, in order to improve relevance of clinical trials to women with HNSCC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Identidade de Gênero , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 2017 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend surgical resection or definitive radiation therapy for early-stage oral cavity malignancies, and surgical resection or multimodality clinical trials for late-stage disease. Few studies have been conducted to identify predictors of choice of treatment modality for oral cavity malignancies. METHODS: All patients in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) diagnosed with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) between 1998 and 2011 were identified. Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to identify factors predictive of surgical or nonsurgical treatment; multiple imputation was used for missing data. Cox proportional hazards models were generated to identify associations between treatment modality and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 23,459 patients, 4139 (17.6%) underwent primary nonsurgical treatment. Among NCDB-registered facilities, there has been a decrease in use of nonsurgical treatment for OCSCC (OR 0.97, p<0.001). Older age, non-white race, Medicaid insurance, low income, low education, and later-stage disease were associated with nonsurgical therapy, while patients at academic/research programs were more likely to undergo surgery (OR 0.38, p<0.001). Nonsurgical treatment was associated with decreased OS (HR=2.02, p<0.001); this was upheld on subgroup analysis of early- and late-stage disease. CONCLUSIONS: Use of primary nonsurgical treatment for OCSCC has decreased over time among NCDB-registered facilities and is associated with factors related to access to care. Surgical resection for the primary treatment of oral cavity cancer may be associated with improved OS, though conclusions regarding survival are limited by the non-randomized nature of the data.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias Bucais/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Feminino , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Bucais/cirurgia , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Foci of increased radioactive iodine (RAI) uptake in the thyroid bed following total thyroidectomy (TT) indicate residual thyroid tissue that may be benign or malignant. The use of postoperative RAI therapy in the form of remnant ablation, adjuvant therapy, or therapeutic intervention is often followed by a posttherapy scan. Our objective is to improve the clinician's understanding of the anatomic complexity of this region and to enhance the interpretation of postoperative scans. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive review of the literature evaluating RAI uptake in the central compartment following thyroid cancer treatment and literature related to anatomic nuances associated with this region. Thirty-eight articles were selected. RESULTS: Through extensive surgical experience and a literature review, we identified the 5 most important anatomic considerations for clinicians to understand in the interpretation of foci of increased RAI uptake in the thyroid bed on a diagnostic scan: 1) residual benign thyroid tissue at the level of the posterior thyroid ligament, 2) residual benign thyroid tissue at the superior portion of the pyramidal lobe and/or superior poles of the lateral thyroid lobes, 3) residual benign thyroid tissue that was left attached to a parathyroid gland in order to preserve its vascularity, 4) ectopic benign thyroid tissue, and 5) malignant thyroid tissue that has metastasized to central compartment nodes or invaded visceral structures. CONCLUSION: By correlating anatomic description, medical illustrations, surgical photos, and scans, we have attempted to clarify the reasons for foci of increased uptake following TT to improve the clinician's understanding of the anatomic complexity of this region.