Global Perspective of the Vitamin D Status of African-Caribbean Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Vitamin D deficiency remains a global public health issue, particularly in minority ethnic groups. This review investigates the vitamin D status (as measured by 25(OH)D and dietary intake) of the African-Caribbean population globally. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching key databases (PUBMED, Web of Science, Scopus) from inception until October 2019. Search terms included 'Vitamin D status' and 'African-Caribbean'. A random effects and fixed effects meta-analysis was performed by combining means and standard error of the mean. RESULT: The search yielded 19 papers that included n = 5670 African-Caribbean participants from six countries. A meta-analysis found this population to have sufficient (>50 nmol/L) 25(OH)D levels at 67.8 nmol/L, 95% CI (57.9, 7.6) but poor dietary intake of vitamin D at only 3.0 µg/day, 95% CI (1.67,4.31). For those living at low latitudes 'insufficient' (as defined by study authors) 25(OH)D levels were found only in participants with type 2 diabetes and in those undergoing haemodialysis. Suboptimal dietary vitamin D intake (according to the UK recommended nutrient intake of 10 µg/day) was reported in all studies at high latitudes. Studies at lower latitudes, with lower recommended dietary intakes (Caribbean recommended dietary intake: 2.5 µg/day) found 'sufficient' intake in two out of three studies. CONCLUSIONS: 25(OH)D sufficiency was found in African-Caribbean populations at lower latitudes. However, at higher latitudes, 25(OH)D deficiency and low dietary vitamin D intake was prevalent.

Vitamin D Supplementation and Sunlight Exposure on Serum Vitamin D Concentrations in 2 Parallel, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D concentrations are a function of sunlight exposure and dietary intake. However, current dietary vitamin D recommendations do not consider differences in country-specific sunlight availability or spontaneous individual exposure. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation and sunlight exposure on vitamin D concentrations in Brazilian women living in high compared with low latitudes. METHODS: In 2 parallel, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials, Brazilian women living in England (51°N) composed "without ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure" groups and those living in Brazil (16°S) composed the "with UVB exposure" groups (mean age, 31.39 ± 8.7 years). Participants received 15 µg cholecalciferol or placebo daily for 12 weeks during wintertime. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations, the primary outcome, were assessed by HPLC-MS/MS, vitamin D intakes were assessed by 4-day diet diaries, and sunlight exposure was assessed by UVB dosimeters. The effects of supplementation and UVB exposure were tested by the intention to treat with a linear mixed model. RESULTS: The 25(OH)D concentrations increased in both supplemented groups [from 75.1 ± 22.0 to 84.8 ± 21.0 nmol/L (P = 0.004) in the group with UVB exposure; from 38.1 ± 15.9 to 55.1 ± 12.2 nmol/L (P < 0.001) in the group without UVB exposure], with no significant changes in either placebo group. Concentrations in both supplemented groups were higher than those in the placebo group without UVB exposure (P = 0.0002 in the group with UVB exposure; P = 0.0035 in the group without UVB exposure). Postintervention 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly affected by serum 25(OH)D concentrations at baseline (P < 0.0001) and by intervention (placebo or supplement; P > 0.0001), with a large effect size (Cohen's D = 0.768), but were not affected by UVB exposure (with or without; P = 0.1386), nor by the interaction between the intervention (placebo or supplement) and UVB exposure (with or without; P = 0.9845). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate supplementation of 15 ug/d cholecalciferol, in accordance with current recommendations, supports an adequate vitamin D status in adult women, irrespective of latitude, and might concomitantly prevent an increase in parathyroid hormone. The Interaction Between Vitamin D Supplementation and Sunlight Exposure in Women Living in Opposite Latitudes (D-SOL) study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03318029.

The relationship between vitamin D status, intake and exercise performance in UK University-level athletes and healthy inactive controls.

The potential ergogenic effects of vitamin D (vitD) in high performing athletes has received considerable attention in the literature and media. However, little is known about non-supplemented university athletes and students residing at a higher latitude. This study aimed to investigate the effects of vitD (biochemical status and dietary intake) on exercise performance in UK university athletes and sedentary students. A total of 34 athletes and 16 sedentary controls were studied during the spring and summer months. Serum vitD status and sunlight exposure were assessed using LC-MS/MS and dosimetry, respectively. Muscular strength of the upper and lower body was assessed using handgrip and knee extensor dynamometry (KE). Countermovement jump (CMJ) and aerobic fitness were measured using an Optojump and VO2max test, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using paired/ independent t-tests, ANCOVA and Pearson/ Spearman correlations, depending on normality. VitD status increased significantly over the seasons, with athletes measuring higher status both in spring (51.7±20.5 vs. 37.2±18.9 nmol/L, p = 0.03) and summer (66.7±15.8 vs 55.6±18.8 nmol/L, p = 0.04) when compared to controls, respectively. Notably, 22% of the subjects recruited were vitD deficient during the spring term only (<25nmol/L, n 9). Subjects with 'insufficient' vitD status (<50nmol/L) elicited significantly lower CMJ when contrasted to the vitD 'sufficient' (>50nmol/l) group (p = 0.055) and a lower VO2 max (p = 0.05) in the spring and summer term (p = 0.05 and p = 0.01, respectively). However, an ANCOVA test showed no significant difference detected for either CMJ or VO2max following adjustments for co-variates. In conclusion, we provide novel information on the vitD status, dietary intake, physical fitness and sunlight exposure of UK young adults across two separate seasons, for which there is limited data at present.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of iodine supplementation on thyroid function and child neurodevelopment in mildly-to-moderately iodine-deficient pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: Mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency, particularly in pregnancy, is prevalent; this is of concern because observational studies have shown negative associations with child neurodevelopment. Although neither the benefits nor the safety of iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency are well researched, such supplementation is increasingly being recommended by health authorities in a number of countries. OBJECTIVES: By reviewing the most recent published data on the effects of iodine supplementation in mildly-to-moderately deficient pregnant women on maternal and infant thyroid function and child cognition, we aimed to determine whether the evidence was sufficient to support recommendations in these areas. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT interventions, and observational studies was conducted. To identify relevant articles, we searched the PubMed and Embase databases. We defined mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency as a baseline median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of 50-149 µg/L. Eligible studies were included in meta-analyses. RESULTS: In total, 37 publications were included-10 RCTs, 4 non-RCT interventions, and 23 observational studies. Most studies showed no effect of iodine supplementation on maternal or infant thyroid-stimulating hormone and free thyroxine. Most RCTs found that supplementation reduced maternal thyroglobulin and in 3 RCTs, it prevented or diminished the increase in maternal thyroid volume during pregnancy. Three RCTs addressed child neurodevelopment; only 1 was adequately powered. Meta-analyses of 2 RCTs showed no effect on child cognitive [mean difference (MD): -0.18; 95% CI: -1.22, 0.87], language (MD: 1.28; 95% CI: -0.28, 2.83), or motor scores (MD: 0.28; 95% CI: -1.10, 1.66). CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient good-quality evidence to support current recommendations for iodine supplementation in pregnancy in areas of mild-to-moderate deficiency. Well-designed RCTs, with child cognitive outcomes, are needed in pregnant women who are moderately deficient (median UIC < 100 µg/L). Maternal intrathyroidal iodine stores should be considered in future trials by including appropriate measures of preconceptional iodine intake.This review was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero as CRD42018100277.