Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Nutrients ; 12(10)2020 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33023067

RESUMO

Intake of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA 22:6n-3) is very low among Indian pregnant women. Maternal supplementation during pregnancy and lactation may benefit offspring neurodevelopment. We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of supplementing pregnant Indian women (singleton gestation) from ≤20 weeks through 6 months postpartum with 400 mg/d algal DHA compared to placebo on neurodevelopment of their offspring at 12 months. Of 3379 women screened, 1131 were found eligible; 957 were randomized. The primary outcome was infant neurodevelopment at 12 months, assessed using the Development Assessment Scale for Indian Infants (DASII). Both groups were well balanced on sociodemographic variables at baseline. More than 72% of women took >90% of their assigned treatment. Twenty-five serious adverse events (SAEs), none related to the intervention, (DHA group = 16; placebo = 9) were noted. Of 902 live births, 878 were followed up to 12 months; the DASII was administered to 863 infants. At 12 months, the mean development quotient (DQ) scores in the DHA and placebo groups were not statistically significant (96.6 ± 12.2 vs. 97.1 ± 13.0, p = 0.60). Supplementing mothers through pregnancy and lactation with 400 mg/d DHA did not impact offspring neurodevelopment at 12 months of age in this setting.


Assuntos
Desenvolvimento Infantil/efeitos dos fármacos , Suplementos Nutricionais , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/administração & dosagem , Fenômenos Fisiológicos da Nutrição Materna , Transtornos do Neurodesenvolvimento/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Lactação , Gravidez
2.
Indian J Dent Res ; 21(1): 104-6, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20427917

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and microcurrent electrical nerve stimulation (MENS) on masticatory muscles pain bruxism patient. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 subjects with the clinical diagnosis of bruxism were randomly allocated to two study groups. Group A received TENS (50 Hz, pulse width 0.5 mSec, intensity 0-60 mA for 20 minutes for a period of seven days) and Group B received MENS (0.5 Hz, intensity 1,000 muA for 20 minutes for a period of seven days). The outcome measures were assessed in term of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and digital pressometer of 2 Kgf. RESULTS: The study showed significant change in intensity of pain as per VAS score ( P

Assuntos
Bruxismo/complicações , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Dor Facial/terapia , Músculos da Mastigação/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Dor Facial/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estimulação Subliminar , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA