Telestroke Across the Continuum of Care: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic.

While use of telemedicine to guide emergent treatment of ischemic stroke is well established, the COVID-19 pandemic motivated the rapid expansion of care via telemedicine to provide consistent care while reducing patient and provider exposure and preserving personal protective equipment. Temporary changes in re-imbursement, inclusion of home office and patient home environments, and increased access to telehealth technologies by patients, health care staff and health care facilities were key to provide an environment for creative and consistent high-quality stroke care. The continuum of care via telestroke has broadened to include prehospital, inter-facility and intra-facility hospital-based services, stroke telerehabilitation, and ambulatory telestroke. However, disparities in technology access remain a challenge. Preservation of reimbursement and the reduction of regulatory burden that was initiated during the public health emergency will be necessary to maintain expanded patient access to the full complement of telestroke services. Here we outline many of these initiatives and discuss potential opportunities for optimal use of technology in stroke care through and beyond the pandemic.

A Stroke Care Model at an Academic, Comprehensive Stroke Center During the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has required the adaptation of hyperacute stroke care (including stroke code pathways) and hospital stroke management. There remains a need to provide rapid and comprehensive assessment to acute stroke patients while reducing the risk of COVID-19 exposure, protecting healthcare providers, and preserving personal protective equipment (PPE) supplies. While the COVID infection is typically not a primary cerebrovascular condition, the downstream effects of this pandemic force adjustments to stroke care pathways to maintain optimal stroke patient outcomes. METHODS: The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Health System encompasses two academic, Comprehensive Stroke Centers (CSCs). The UCSD Stroke Center reviewed the national COVID-19 crisis and implications on stroke care. All current resources for stroke care were identified and adapted to include COVID-19 screening. The adjusted model focused on comprehensive and rapid acute stroke treatment, reduction of exposure to the healthcare team, and preservation of PPE. AIMS: The adjusted pathways implement telestroke assessments as a specific option for all inpatient and outpatient encounters and accounts for when telemedicine systems are not available or functional. COVID screening is done on all stroke patients. We outline a model of hyperacute stroke evaluation in an adapted stroke code protocol and novel methods of stroke patient management. CONCLUSIONS: The overall goal of the model is to preserve patient access and outcomes while decreasing potential COVID-19 exposure to patients and healthcare providers. This model also serves to reduce the use of vital PPE. It is critical that stroke providers share best practices via academic and vetted social media platforms for rapid dissemination of tools and care models during the COVID-19 crisis.

Incremental treatments with laser therapy augments good behavioral outcome in the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model.

Transcranial near-infrared laser therapy (TLT) improves behavioral outcome in animal stroke models when applied as single treatment within the 24 h of the stroke onset. It is unknown if the multiple TLT treatments have an added beneficial effect. We aim to determine whether multiple irradiations with TLT would have further improvement in behavioral outcomes in the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model (RSCEM). Using the RSCEM, two and three TLT treatments (7.5-20 mW/cm(2)) were compared against single laser treatment alone (7.5-10.8 mW/cm(2)). Two sham irradiation groups were added for the control curves. The double treatment group received TLT at 3 and 5 h and the triple treatment group at 2, 3, and 4 h after embolization. Behavioral analysis was conducted 24 h after embolization using a dichotomized behavioral score. The determination of the effective clot amount (milligrams) that produces neurological deficits in 50 % of the rabbits (P 50) was used to compare TLT treatments with the sham. The P 50 for double treatment was 5.47 ± 0.90, with n = 39; the corresponding P 50 value for a single treatment was 3.87 ± 0.73, with n = 38; and the corresponding control curve was 3.25 ± 0.4, n = 32. The P 50 for triple treatment was 5.91 ± 0.49, with n = 23; the corresponding P 50 value for a single treatment was 3.09 ± 0.59, with n = 15, and the corresponding control curve was 1.71 ± 0.26, with n = 17. The triple treatment had 91 % improvement when compared with the single treatment and 245 % improvement when compared with the sham. The present study suggests that the additional TLT treatments provide further behavioral improvement when given during the acute ischemic stroke phase.

Telestroke network fundamentals.

The objectives of this manuscript are to identify key components to maintaining the logistic and/or operational sustainability of a telestroke network, to identify best practices to be considered for assessment and management of acute stroke when planning for and developing a telestroke network, to show practical steps to enable progress toward implementing a telestroke solution for optimizing acute stroke care, to incorporate evidence-based practice guidelines and care pathways into a telestroke network, to emphasize technology variables and options, and to propose metrics to use when determining the performance, outcomes, and quality of a telestroke network.