Metabolomic analysis of uremic pruritus in patients on hemodialysis.

Pruritus is a common debilitating symptom experienced by hemodialysis patients. Treatment is difficult because the cause of uremic pruritus is not known. This study addressed the hypothesis that pruritus is caused by solutes that accumulate in the plasma when the kidneys fail. We sought to identify solutes responsible for uremic pruritus using metabolomic analysis to compare the plasma of hemodialysis patients with severe pruritus versus mild/no pruritus. Pruritus severity in hemodialysis patients was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS), with severe pruritus defined as >70 mm and mild/no pruritus defined as <10 mm. Twelve patients with severe pruritus (Itch) and 24 patients with mild/no pruritus (No Itch) were included. Pre-treatment plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate were analyzed using an established metabolomic platform (Metabolon, Inc.). To identify solutes associated with pruritus, we compared the average peak area of each solute in the Itch patients to that of the No Itch patients using the false discovery rate (q value) and principal component analysis. Dialysis vintage, Kt/Vurea, and serum levels of calcium, phosphorus, PTH, albumin, ferritin, and hemoglobin were similar in the Itch and No Itch patients. Metabolomic analysis identified 1,548 solutes of which 609 were classified as uremic. No difference in the plasma or plasma ultrafiltrate levels of any solute or group of solutes was found between the Itch and No Itch patients. Metabolomic analysis of hemodialysis patients did not reveal any solutes associated with pruritus. A limitation of metabolomic analysis is that the solute of interest may not be included in the metabolomic platform's chemical library. A role for uremic solutes in pruritus remains to be established.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on intrarenal angiotensin and bradykinin levels in experimental renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Whereas angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists have beneficial effects in the remnant model of renal failure, calcium channel blockers do not consistently improve renal disease in this model. This study examined whether these different means of blood pressure reduction have different effects on renal levels of angiotensin (Ang) and bradykinin peptides. METHODS: Rats subjected to five-sixths nephrectomy were divided into groups with similar hypertension and proteinuria at 4 to 5 weeks. They then received either no treatment, or enalapril, losartan or nifedipine for 2 weeks. Following repeat measurements of proteinuria and blood pressure, Ang II and bradykinin peptides were measured in the remnant kidney and renin, Ang II, and aldosterone were measured in the plasma. RESULTS: All three drugs had equivalent blood pressure-lowering effects. Enalapril and losartan reduced proteinuria but nifedipine did not. Reduction of proteinuria in rats treated with enalapril and losartan was associated with a reduction in Ang II levels in both the peri-infarct and intact portions of the remnant kidney. By contrast, nifedipine increased Ang II levels in the intact portion of the remnant kidney. Losartan reduced bradykinin levels in the peri-infarct portion of the remnant kidney while enalapril reduced bradykinin levels in the intact portion of the remnant kidney. Nifedipine had no effect on intrarenal bradykinin levels. CONCLUSIONS: The differential effects of enalapril, losartan and nifedipine on proteinuria and intrarenal Ang II and bradykinin levels suggest that the ability of an antihypertensive to decrease proteinuria may depend on its ability to decrease kidney Ang II and bradykinin levels.