Peripheral Regional Anesthetic Techniques in Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate postoperative pain outcomes and adverse events after peripheral regional anesthesia (PRA) compared to no regional anesthesia (RA), placebo, or neuraxial anesthesia in children and adults undergoing cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis with an assessment of the risk of bias (Cochrane RoB 1) and certainty of evidence (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). SETTING: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PARTICIPANTS: Adults and children undergoing heart surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Any kind of PRA compared to no RA or placebo or neuraxial anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In total, 33 RCTs (2,044 patients) were included-24 of these had a high risk of bias, and 28 were performed in adults. Compared to no RA, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest 24 hours after surgery (mean difference [MD] -0.81 points, 95% CI -1.51 to -0.10; I2 = 92%; very low certainty evidence). Peripheral regional anesthesia, compared to placebo, may reduce pain intensity at rest (MD -1.36 points, 95% CI -1.59 to -1.13; I2 = 54%; very low certainty evidence) and during movement (MD -1.00 points, 95% CI -1.34 to -0.67; I² = 72%; very low certainty evidence) 24 hours after surgery. No data after pediatric cardiac surgery could be meta-analyzed due to the low number of included trials. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to no RA or placebo, PRA may reduce pain intensity at rest and during movement. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously because the certainty of evidence is only very low.

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation shows no effect on paired stimulation suppression of the somatosensory cortex.

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a safe and convenient method of neuromodulation. It has been proven to alter sensory processing at cervicomedullary level by amplitude changes of the P30 response of tibial nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (TN SEPs). With knowledge that tsDCS affects cortical circuits, we hypothesized that tsDCS may also affect intracortical excitability of the somatosensory cortex assessed by paired stimulation suppression (PSS). Fourteen healthy men were included in this prospective, single-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study. Single (SS) and paired stimulation (PS) TN SEPs were recorded over the scalp before, immediately as well as 30 and 60 min after applying 15 min of tsDCS over the twelfth thoracic vertebra. Each volunteer underwent three independent and randomized sessions of either cathodal, anodal or sham stimulation. tsDCS showed no effect on peak-to-peak amplitudes or latencies of cortical P40-N50 response after SS. Furthermore, tsDCS failed to induce significant changes on amplitude ratios of PSS, thus showing no impact on intracortical excitability of the somatosensory cortex in healthy subjects. Further research is required to reveal the different mechanisms and to strengthen clinical use of this promising technique.

Effects of Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Reflected in Sensory Profiles and Endogenous Pain Modulation.

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord and peripheral nerve stimulation (SCS/PNS) may alleviate chronic pain; however, the underlying mechanisms remain controversial. The aim of this observational study was to assess sensory changes in the ON-conditions and OFF-conditions to obtain insights into the mechanism of analgesic effects of SCS/PNS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We contacted 85 patients and selected 28 patients with sufficient pain relief by SCS (n=15) or PNS (n=13) to assess their ongoing pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale, 0 to 10), pain thresholds using Quantitative Sensory Testing (DFNS-protocol), and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in a nonrandomized manner 2 to 4 hours after SCS/PNS deactivation (OFF-condition) and during stimulation (ON-condition). For each patient, the number of abnormally decreased pain thresholds, the presence of dynamic mechanical allodynia, and/or increased pain sensitivity was additionally totaled OR summed. RESULTS: In the ON-condition, pain intensity decreased (Numerical Rating Scale SCS: 6.5±2.1 vs. 3.7±2.3, P<0.01; PNS: 6.2±1.4 vs. 4±1.9, P<0.01), but this did not correlate with any single sensory parameter. However, for SCS, the total number of parameters indicating hyperalgesia was significantly reduced in the ON-condition (45 vs. 23, P=0.001). A smaller CPM effect in the OFF-condition correlated with a greater CPM improvement during stimulation (SCS: r=-0.741, P=0.002; PNS: r=-0.773, P=0.003), independently from the spontaneous pain intensity. DISCUSSION: The analgesic effect of SCS/PNS did not correlate with changes of single sensory parameters, but SCS/PNS reduced the number of abnormal hyperalgesic findings disregarding the kind of applied stimuli, suggesting a general antihyperalgesic effect. In addition, stimulation improved the endogenous pain inhibition. Both findings indicate that SCS/PNS may modulate central circuits.

Transcutaneous Spinal Direct Current Stimulation Alters Resting-State Functional Connectivity.

Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS) is a noninvasive method that can modulate spinal reflexes, sensory afferent conduction, and even pain perception. Although neurophysiological evidence suggests that tsDCS alters somatosensory and nociceptive afferent conduction to the cortex, its supraspinal effects have not yet been investigated by using functional imaging to investigate tsDCS-induced alterations in intrinsic functional connectivity (FC). Therefore, we hypothesize that tsDCS-induced changes in neurophysiological measures might also be reflected in spontaneous brain activity. We investigated tsDCS-induced changes in somatosensory cortical connectivity by using seed-to-voxel-based analyses from the bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and the thalamus in a double-blind, crossover study design. Resting state FC was measured by using blood oxygenation level-dependent, functional magnetic resonance imaging (3T Philips) before and after anodal, cathodal, and sham tsDCS (20 min, 2.5 mA, active electrode centered over T11 spinous process, reference electrode over left shoulder blade) in a double-blind, crossover study of 20 healthy men (24 ± 0.7 years). As compared with sham, anodal tsDCS resulted in a decreased connectivity between the S1 and the ipsilateral posterior insula for both left and right hemispheres. Anodal tsDCS also resulted in decreased thalamic connectivity with the anterior cingulate cortex, and increased connectivity between S1 and the thalamus. Cathodal tsDCS showed increased FC between the right thalamus and both left and right posterior insulae, and decreased connectivity between the S1 seeds and the occipital cortex. Our results provide evidence of supraspinal effects of tsDCS and suggest that tsDCS may provide a noninvasive intervention that is able to target cortical sensory networks.