RESUMO
The year 2023 marks 60 years since the first pacemaker was implanted in Poland. The number of implantable cardiac electrotherapy devices (CIEDs), including pacemakers, cardioverter-defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy systems, has been systematically increasing in the subsequent decades. It is estimated that nearly 500,000 Poles have an implanted cardiac electrotherapy device, making optimal diagnostic imaging with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a clinically and epidemiologically important issue. MRI has become a gold diagnostic standard in many disease states. In this situation, it is believed that 50-70% of patients who have a cardiac electrotherapy device may have indications for an MRI examination later in life. For many years, an implanted cardiac electrotherapy device was considered a definite contraindication to MRI. However, MRI has become possible in most patients with CIED if certain procedures and precautions are followed. In these guidelines, we describe the basic rules that should be followed in order to perform a safe MRI examination in patients with different CIEDs. Despite all the risks and organizational factors described in the text, it seems that for many MRI departments, MRI in patients with CIEDs is achievable and should be implemented immediately. A second important issue is the need for dedicated financial support for these procedures from public health insurance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for the exclusion of thrombi in the left atrial appendage (LAA) before ablation for atrial fibrillation. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is used to assist atrial fibrillation ablation; however, it can also be used for LAA imaging. The aim of our study was to determine whether ICE could replace TEE and to identify the optimal ICE placement for LAA visualization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six consecutive patients (56 men; mean age, 55±9.6 years) scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation underwent TEE before the procedure and LAA assessment by ICE. An 8F AcuNav probe was introduced into right atrium, pulmonary artery, and coronary sinus. LAA structure was analyzed by the echocardiographer and electrophysiologist who were blinded to the results of TEE. ICE probe was positioned in the right atrium in all patients, in the pulmonary artery in 64 of 74 (86%) patients, and in the coronary sinus in 49 of 74 (66%) patients. The LAA was properly visualized in 56 of 64 (87.5%) patients from the pulmonary artery versus 13 of 49 (26%) patients from the coronary sinus (P<0.001). From the right atrium, the whole LAA cavity could not be seen in any patient. In those patients in whom LAA was visualized properly by ICE, a perfect agreement between ICE and TEE was obtained (both techniques detected LAA thrombus in 2 patients and excluded LAA thrombus in the remaining patients). CONCLUSIONS: ICE can be used safely and effectively for the evaluation of LAA in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. ICE imaging from pulmonary artery is accurate for LAA visualization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01371279.