Sense of coherence and its context with demographics, psychological aspects, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine and lay aetiology.

PURPOSE: For patients with a cancer diagnosis, coping abilities are of high importance. Cancer patients with a high sense of coherence may cope better. The purpose of this study is to learn more about the correlation of sense of coherence and different aspects, such as demographics, psychological factors, lifestyle, complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and lay aetiology. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in ten cancer centres in Germany. The questionnaire consisted of ten sub-items, collecting information about sense of coherence, demographics, general life satisfaction, resilience, spirituality, self-efficacy, physical activity and sports, nutrition, CAM methods and cancer causes. RESULTS: As many as 349 participants were evaluable. The mean sense of coherence score was M = 47.30. Significant associations were shown for sense of coherence and financial situation (r = 0.230, p < 0.001), level of education (r = 0.187, p < 0.001), marital status (η = 0.177, p = 0.026) and time interval since diagnosis (r = - 0.109, p = 0.045). Sense of coherence and resilience correlated on a high level, as well as spirituality, self-efficacy and general life satisfaction (r = 0.563, r = 0.432, r = 0.461, r = 0.306, p's < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Several aspects, such as demographics and psychological factors, have a great influence on the sense of coherence. To help patients to cope better, physicians should try to strengthen sense of coherence, resilience and self-efficacy and, at the same time, consider patients' individual background such as level of education, financial capacity and emotional support by family members.

Lay etiology concepts of cancer patients do not correlate with their usage of complementary and/or alternative medicine.

BACKGROUND: The usage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread among cancer patients. While reasons for and aims of using CAM have been evaluated in many studies, less is known about whether patients' concepts of how and why cancer develops has an influence on the choice of the CAM method. METHODS: We pooled the data from all studies of our working group containing questions on lay etiological concepts and CAM usage and reanalyzed them with respect to the associations between these parameters. RESULTS: The pooled dataset from 12 studies included 4792 patients. A third (1645 patients) reported using CAM. Most often used were supplements (55.9%), relaxation techniques (43.6%), and homeopathy (37.9%). Regarding perceived causes, patients most often marked stress (35.4%) followed by genes (31.9%). While all lay etiological beliefs were highly significantly associated with usage of CAM in general, there was no association between single lay etiological concepts and types of CAM used. Yet, in a network analysis, we found two associations: one comprising trauma, mistletoe, genes, and nutritional supplements, the other yoga, vitamin C, nutritional supplements, and TCM herbs. In the correlation heatmap, one cluster comprises etiological concepts of personality, immune system and trauma, and two clusters of CAM methods emerged: one comprising praying, yoga, meditation, and relaxation procedures, the other nutritional supplements, selenium, vitamins A and C. CONCLUSION: While physicians are trained to derive treatment strategies from etiological concepts, lay people choosing CAM do not follow these rules, which may point to other needs of patients addressed by CAM.

[Complementary or alternative medicine in oncology : Chances or risks?] / Komplementäre oder alternative Medizin in der Onkologie : Chancen oder Risiken?

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all cancer patients use complementary or alternative medicine. AIM: The results of the German S3 guidelines on complementary oncology are presented and placed into the context of patient consultation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The core recommendations of the S3 guidelines are summarized including an overview of the evidence. RESULTS: Selected methods of complementary medicine can be used with the aim of improving the quality of life and reducing side effects. Comprehensive data are available for physical activity with respect to survival, quality of life and supportive therapy. For most other methods the evidence is relatively low. Therefore, weighing up the benefits and risks more frequently resulted in negative recommendations in the guidelines, especially for methods based on substances. Exceptions to this are three micronutrients (vitamins B12, D and selenium), as even in the case of a well-balanced diet, deficiency symptoms are possible. Therefore, routine measurement of the blood levels of these micronutrients is recommended. CONCLUSION: The questions from patients on what they can do by themselves should be answered respectfully and based on evidence. The benefits and risks of complementary methods must be carefully considered. To do this, regular questioning of patients on the interest in complementary methods is recommended. The decisive benefit of complementary medicine is the chance for patients to become active themselves. Therefore, all recommendations refer to the discussion with the patient, which do not formulate a therapy but are consultation recommendations: should be recommended instead of should be done.

Mistletoe in oncological treatment: a systematic review : Part 2: quality of life and toxicity of cancer treatment.

PURPOSE: One important goal of any cancer therapy is to improve or maintain quality of life. In this context, mistletoe treatment is discussed to be highly controversial. The aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about the current state of evidence concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding quality of life and side effects of cancer treatments. METHODS: In September and October 2017, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 articles and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Regarding quality of life, 17 publications reported results. Studies with better methodological quality show less or no effects on quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to quality of life or reduction of treatment-associated side effects, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.

Mistletoe in oncological treatment: a systematic review : Part 1: survival and safety.

PURPOSE: Mistletoe treatment of cancer patients is discussed highly controversial in the scientific literature. Aim of this systematic review is to give an extensive overview about current state of research concerning mistletoe therapy of oncologic patients regarding survival, quality of life and safety. METHODS: In September and October 2017 Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, CINAHL and "Science Citation Index Expanded" (Web of Science) were systematically searched. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3647 hits and 28 publications with 2639 patients were finally included in this review. Mistletoe was used in bladder cancer, breast cancer, other gynecological cancers (cervical cancer, corpus uteri cancer, and ovarian cancer), colorectal cancer, other gastrointestinal cancer (gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer), glioma, head and neck cancer, lung cancer, melanoma and osteosarcoma. In nearly all studies, mistletoe was added to a conventional therapy. Patient relevant endpoints were overall survival (14 studies, n = 1054), progression- or disease-free survival or tumor response (10 studies, n = 1091). Most studies did not show any effect of mistletoe on survival. Especially high quality studies do not show any benefit. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to survival, a thorough review of the literature does not provide any indication to prescribe mistletoe to patients with cancer.

A lecture program on complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients--evaluation of the pilot phase.

About half of all patients with cancer use complementary or alternative medicine (CAM). In 2013, we started a lecture program for patients, followed by evidence-based recommendations on counseling on CAM. These recommendations have been published before by this working group. The aim of the program is to provide scientific facts on the most often used CAM methods in standardized presentations which help patients discuss the topic with their oncologists and support shared decision making. The article presents the evaluation of the pilot phase. Participants received a standardized questionnaire before the start of the lecture. The questionnaire comprises four parts: demographic data, data concerning experience with CAM, satisfaction with the lecture, and needs for further information on CAM. In 2013, seven lectures on CAM were given in cooperation with regional branches of the German Cancer Society in several German states. Four hundred sixty patients and relatives took part (75% females and 16% males). Forty-eight percent formerly had used CAM. Most often named sources of information on CAM were print media (48%) and the Internet (37%). Most participants rated additional written information valuable. About one third would like to have an individual consultation concerning CAM. A standardized presentation of evidence on CAM methods most often used, together with recommendations on the self-management of symptoms, is highly appreciated. The concept of a highly interactive lecture comprising is feasible and if presented in lay terminology, adequate. In order to give additional support on the topic, written information should be provided as the first step.

Attitudes of members of the German Society for Palliative Medicine toward complementary and alternative medicine for cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: A high proportion of cancer patients use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). In oncology, risks of CAM are side effects and interactions. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to conduct a survey on professionals in palliative care regarding attitudes toward CAM. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: An internet-based survey with a standardized questionnaire was sent to all members of the German Society for Palliative Care. MEASUREMENTS: The questionnaire collected data on attitude toward CAM and experiences. RESULTS: Six hundred and ninety questionnaires (19 %) were returned (49 % physicians, 35 % nurses, 3 % psychologists). Acceptance of CAM is high (92 % for complementary and 54 % for alternative medicine). Most participants had already been asked on CAM by patients (95 %) and relatives (89 %). Forty-four percent already had used complementary methods and 5 % alternative methods. Only 21 % think themselves adequately informed. Seventy-four percent would use complementary methods in a patient with advanced tumor, and 62 % would use alternative therapy in patients if there was no other therapy. Even from those who are skeptical 45 % would treat a patient with alternative methods. CONCLUSIONS: In order to inform patients on CAM and to further patients' autonomy, evidence on benefits and harms of CAM must be provided. As awareness of risks from CAM is low and critical appraisal especially of alternative medicine missing, but interest on information on CAM is high, experts should provide evidence-based recommendations for CAM in palliative care to members of different professions. This could be done by a curriculum focusing on the most often used CAM methods.

Attitude of employees of a university clinic to complementary and alternative medicine in oncology.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), yet discussion with the oncologist is often missing and oncologists lack knowledge in CAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In order to learn more about the attitude of professionals in oncology toward CAM, a survey was conducted on employees of a German university clinic using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 547 employees took part in the survey. One-third would definitely use CAM on cancer patients. Female employees are more interested in CAM than males (80% versus 20%; P = 0.001); physicians are less interested than nurses (57% versus 72%; P = 0.008). 2.5% of physicians and 9% of nurses are convinced that CAM is as effective as conventional therapy in cancer. Fifty-two percent of physicians and 12% of nurses agree that adverse effects due to CAM may be possible. Seventy-three percent did not consider themselves adequately informed on CAM for their professional work. CONCLUSIONS: As a substantial part of participants would use CAM on cancer patients and most are interested in but not trained on this topic, there is a need for training of professionals from different professions working in oncology.

Counseling cancer patients on complementary and alternative medicine. Background, theory, and implementation of nationwide counseling facilities.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is of high relevance in oncology. Only a minority of professionals feel competent in CAM. Our aim was to provide a strategy for establishing evidence-based counseling on CAM in oncology in the German health system. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the literature on patient counseling concerning CAM. Of 811 articles identified in this search 51 met our inclusion criteria. Data from these articles were analyzed and adapted to the needs of German patients by a group of experts of the DEGRO ("Deutschen Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie") and the German Cancer Society. In the next step a strategy about how to integrate evidence-based counseling on CAM at cancer centers and oncological institutions was developed. RESULTS: First, evidence-based recommendations on CAM counseling were derived. The core of our strategy combines two levels of information provision: level 1 will be oncologists, radiotherapists and other specialists and level 2 oncological CAM experts. The latter group will serve as trainers and backup for complicated or advanced questions and for individual counseling of patients with complex needs. Professionals in level 1 will be offered special training. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based counseling on CAM is not only possible but also mandatory in order to meet patient information needs. Our proposal would allow for integrated counseling available at all oncological institutions and guarantee a high quality. Furthermore, provision of information on two different levels allows the effective use of resources (manpower and financing).

[Information on complementary and alternative medicine at homepages of German cancer self-help]. / Informationen zur komplementären und alternativen Medizin auf den Internetseiten deutscher Selbsthilfegruppen für Tumorpatienten.

INTRODUCTION: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is important for cancer patients. The internet has a rising relevance of source of health information. Patient set strong confidence in websites from patient advocacy groups. The websites of German patient advocacy groups were analysed regarding information on CAM. METHODS: An analysis on the homepages of the most important self-help organizations for cancer patients in Germany was performed. A descriptive analysis of the contents at a cutoff date (20.12.2011) listing the contents was done using an instrument based on the HonCode criteria. RESULTS: The homepages of the self-help groups are heterogeneous concerning CAM. Only few sites provide more information. The differences between the self-help groups do not correlate with the known user rate of patients with different kinds of cancer. Most homepages dealing with the topic also point to the associated problems of side effects and interactions. All homepages make a clear difference between information and opinion. Influences from outside were not detected. CONCLUSION: In spite of a high number of patients using CAM the topic is only infrequently represented on the homepages. This could be due to difficult and contradictory data on KAM. As websites of patient advocacy are well suited to provide information on CAM the patient version of a S3 guideline in the German national guideline program in oncology could provide a fundament.

How are Interactions Taken into Account in Studies on Conventional and Complementary Therapies for Breast Cancer Patients with Menopausal Complaints?

Introduction: Postmenopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients undergoing antihormone treatment lead to high drop-out rates from the therapy. From the therapeutic point of view, methods of both conventional and complementary medicine are concerned. Interactions are being discussed in cases of natural substances. However, they are also relevant for conventional medical substances. The aim of this analysis is to answer the question as to what extent potential interactions are taken into account in clinical studies and reviews on supportive therapies. Materials and Methods: Clinical studies and reviews were identified by means of a systematic search and analysed with regard to the consideration of potential interactions. Results: Altogether 46 clinical studies and one Cochrane review were found. Among the 35 studies on conventional drug therapies, 5 (14 %) took possible interactions into account. Among the 17 studies on complementary medicine, there were 2 (11.7 %) such publications. The Cochrane review did not mention interactions. Discussion: For future studies in which interactions cannot be excluded, a strategy to control for their clinically relevant consequences should be developed. The present authors suggest that the use of survival and recurrence data as secondary endpoints, also for studies on purely supportive therapies, is a reasonable approach. The resulting considerations for study routines are listed thematically.

Complementary and alternative medicine in lung cancer patients: a neglected phenomenon?

Study on the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in lung cancer patients has been widely neglected. Therefore, we initiated a study on the use of CAM in lung cancer patients in addition to radiation treatment. Overall, 120 patients from 3 institutions were interviewed by a standardized questionnaire. Besides the tumor parameters and the use of CAM, the reason for the use, patient information of the medication, the information sources and the subjective condition of the patient. Altogether, 54% of the patients reported using CAM (66% of female patients, 52% of male patients). The most frequently used CAM measures were vitamin combinations (17%), mistletoe (15%), and selenium (12%). A total of 52% reported the wish to support the tumor treatment as a reason for using CAM and 27% had a 'better feeling' using CAM. 50% of CAM was bought by the patients themselves and 50% were prescribed by their family physicians. The use of CAM is frequent in lung cancer patients. Our results suggest that it is very important to obtain information on the CAM use of patients and, particularly in controlled clinical trials, to prospectively document it.

Selenium in the treatment of head and neck lymphedema.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of selenium in the treatment of lymphedema of the head and neck region after radiotherapy alone or in combination with surgery. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: Between June 1996 and June 2001 a total of 36 cancer patients (29 male, 7 female; median age 61 years) were treated with selenium for persistent, extensive or progressive lymphedema of the head and neck region. Twenty had interstitial endolaryngeal edema associated with stridor and dyspnea. All patients received 350 microg/m(2) body surface sodium selenite medication p.o. daily (total dose 50 microg per day) for a period of 4-6 weeks after radiotherapy. The optimal effect of the selenium treatment was assessed after 4 weeks of therapy using the Miller score system. A visual analogue scale on a scale of 0-10 was used to assess the patient's quality of life prior to and after selenium. RESULTS: 75% of the patients had an improvement of the Miller score of one stage or more. The self-assessment of quality of life using the visual analogue scale improved significantly after selenium treatment with a reduction of 4.4 points (p < 0.05). Of the 20 patients with endolaryngeal edema tracheostomy was not necessary in 13 patients (65%), but 5 and 2 received a temporary or permanent tracheostomy, respectively. No episode of erysipelas was observed in all study patients. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a short positive effect of sodium selenite on secondary head and neck lymphedema caused by radiotherapy alone or in combination with surgery.

[Status of essential trace elements in untreated carcinomas of the head and neck]. / Status essenzieller Spurenelemente bei unbehandelten Kopf-Hals-Karzinomen.

BACKGROUND: The changed mineral status is well known in different tumor types. This phenomenon has influenced the redox potential of patients suffering from solid cancers. A prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the specifics for untreated head and neck cancer patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 100 patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region before each kind of treatment. Following serum-concentrations were measured by atom absorption spectrometry: selenium, copper, zinc, and ferrum. Additionally we evaluated the activity of glutathion peroxidase and the concentration of malondialdehyde of the serum. RESULTS: 66 % of all patients have shown a decreased serum-concentration of selenium. These patients were additionally characterized by decreased activities of endogenous glutathionperoxiase. A third of all patients had decreased zinc and iron levels. Copper was found enhanced in 30 %. In trend the malondialdehyde was increasing due to decreasing selenium levels. CONCLUSIONS: Head neck cancer patients show the same characteristic trace element status as other solid tumors: decreased selenium, zinc and iron, increased copper. The therapeutic consequences of these observations are still unclear.

[Use of complementary/alternative therapy methods by patients with breast cancer]. / Anwendung komplementärer/alternativer Therapiemassnahmen bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs.

BACKGROUND: Complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) is gaining increasing importance especially in the treatment of patients with breast carcinoma. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the prevalence of CAM in patients with breast carcinoma, to statistically describe the preparations and therapies used, and to determine the reasons for their use, the source of information and the individual perception. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The statements of 203 patients with breast carcinoma who underwent radiotherapy were analyzed. The median age was 54 years (range 38-77 years). All patients underwent surgery as first therapy. 36 patients received a second-line radiotherapy because of metastases (27 patients) or local recurrence (9 patients). RESULTS: 159 patients (78%) stated to carry out an additional treatment. 31 out of the 36 patients with metastases or local recurrence used CAM. Vitamin preparations (67%), mistletoe therapy (59%), and mineral preparations (33%) were used most frequently. 70% of the patients used a combination of two or more preparations/therapies. The most cited reason for using CAM was the aim of increasing quality of life (28%) and improving the immune system (27%). 72% stated an improvement of their individual perception. The main source of information was the general practitioner or the gynecologist. CONCLUSION: The radiotherapist has to take these complementary/alternative therapies into consideration; their importance should be evaluated in further studies.

[The value of magnetic resonance tomography (MRI) with reference to economic aspects of radiotherapy planning of vertebral metastases. A cost benefit analysis]. / Die Wertigkeit der Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) unter ökonomischen Aspekten bei der Bestrahlungsplanung von Wirbelkörpermetastasen. Eine Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse.

Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based target volume definition for treatment planning of vertebral metastasis effective under economic considerations. From 1994 to 1999, a total of 137 patients with bone metastases affecting the vertebral column underwent MRI of the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine for the treatment planning of palliative radiation therapy. The following radiation treatment consisted in a irradiation of the affected vertebral region up to a total dose of 30-40 Gy. The cost calculation for radiotherapy and magnetic resonance tomography was done using the common tariff model (EBM) of the German Health Insurances. In 73% of patients (101 patients), magnetic resonance imaging resulted in marked corrections of the irradiation fields which would have resulted in the necessity of treatment for recurrence in the case of treatment planning without MRI. Consequently, the higher cost of MRI of 345.00 DEM (176,40 EUR) lead to a saving of 497.00 DEM (254,11 EUR) compared to a recurrence treatment of 10 fractions and of 1,428.00 DEM (730,12 EUR) compared to 20 fractions. The transport expenses for the second treatment could be saved as well. Even under economic considerations MRI is effective.