Randomized double-blind personalized N-of-1 clinical trial to test the safety and potential efficacy of TJ-68 for treating muscle cramps in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): study protocol for a TJ-68 trial.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Muscle cramps are a common and often disabling symptom in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a devastating and incurable neurodegenerative disorder. To date, there are no medications specifically approved for the treatment of muscle cramps. Ameliorating muscle cramps in ALS may improve and sustain quality of life. A widely prescribed traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine against muscle cramps, shakuyakukanzoto (TJ-68), has been studied in advanced liver disease, spinal stenosis, kidney failure, and diabetic neuropathy. The Japanese ALS Management Guideline mentions TJ-68 for difficult muscle cramps in ALS. Therefore, the rationale of our trial is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of TJ-68 in treating painful and disabling muscle cramps in people with ALS outside of Japan. Accordingly, we are conducting a randomized clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of TJ-68 in participants with ALS reporting frequent muscle cramps using an innovative, personalized N-of-1 design. If successful, TJ-68 may be used for muscle cramps in a broader population of people with ALS. METHODS: This is a two-site, double-blind, randomized personalized N-of-1 early clinical trial with TJ-68. At least 22 participants with ALS and daily muscle cramps will receive drug or placebo for 2 weeks (one treatment period) followed by a 1-week washout in a four-period cross-over design. While the primary objective is to evaluate the safety of TJ-68, the study has 85% power to detect a one-point shift on the Visual Analog Scale for Muscle Cramps Affecting Overall Daily Activity of the Columbia Muscle Cramp Scale (MCS). Secondary outcomes include the full MCS score, a Cramp Diary, Clinical Global Impression of Changes, Goal Attainment Scale, quality of life scale and ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R). DISCUSSION: The study is underway. A personalized N-of-1 trial design is an efficient approach to testing medications that alleviate muscle cramps in rare disorders. If TJ-68 proves safe and efficacious then it may be used to treat cramps in ALS, and help to improve and sustain quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This clinical trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04998305), 8/9/2021.

[A prognostic biomarker in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis].

Although we currently have two, approved, disease-modifying drugs for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), we are in disperate need for more efficacious treatment. To aggressively test for newer therapies, we must develop reliable objective biomarkers to supplement clinical outcome measures. Many biomarker candidates have been actively and vigorously investigated. Among neurophysiological biomarkers, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-based biomarkers show potential in exploring disease mechanisms. Neuroimaging biomarkers have high specificity in diagnosing ALS but are an expensive endeavor and are not sensitive enough to detect changes over time of the disease. Among fluid-based biochemical biomarkers, creatinine (Crn) and uric acids (UA), which have been known for decades, may prove to be highly promising biomarkers that can predict disease progression. They can be easily tested in any clinical trials because the costs are minimal. Although known for some time, neurofilaments (NF), either phosphorylated-NF heavy subunit (pNFH) or NF light subunit (NFL), have emerged as "new" biomarkers using specific antibodies. They appear to be highly specific and sensitive in diagnosing ALS, yet they may be insensitive to assess changes in disease over time. These two NF biomarkers along with Crn and UA should be explored extensively in future clinical trials and any other clinical studies in ALS. Yet, we still need newer, more innovative, and reliable biomarkers for future ALS research. Fortunatley, aggressive investigations appear to be currently underway.

Bioenergetic markers in skin fibroblasts of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive lateral sclerosis patients.

Energy metabolism could influence amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and progressive lateral sclerosis (PLS) pathogenesis and the response to therapy. We developed a novel assay to simultaneously assess mitochondrial content and membrane potential in patients' skin fibroblasts. In ALS and PLS fibroblasts, membrane potential was increased and mitochondrial content decreased, relative to healthy controls. In ALS higher mitochondrial membrane potential correlated with age at diagnosis, and in PLS it correlated with disease severity. These unprecedented findings in ALS and PLS fibroblasts could shed new light onto disease pathogenesis and help in developing biomarkers to predict disease evolution and the individual response to therapy in motor neuron diseases.

Emerging drugs for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

INTRODUCTION: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease that results in increasing disability and that is uniformly fatal. Since its approval in the 1990s, riluzole remains the sole treatment for ALS offering modest survival benefit. While significant advances have been made in the symptomatic management of the disease, more effective drug therapy targeting disease progression is sorely needed. AREAS COVERED: Advances in the understanding of pathogenic mechanisms involved in disease development and progression have provided multiple avenues for developing effective treatment strategies. This review highlights recent discoveries relating to these diverse mechanisms and their implications for the development of drug therapy. Previous human clinical trials that have targeted these pathways are mentioned and ongoing drug trials are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: The search for effective drug therapy faces important challenges in the areas of basic science and animal research, translation of these results into human clinical trials, inherent bias in human studies and issues related to delays in clinical diagnosis. How these issues may be addressed and why ALS research constitutes fertile grounds for drug development not only for this devastating disease, but also for other more prevalent neurodegenerative diseases, is discussed in this review.

Phase II trial of CoQ10 for ALS finds insufficient evidence to justify phase III.

OBJECTIVE: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating, and currently incurable, neuromuscular disease in which oxidative stress and mitochondrial impairment are contributing to neuronal loss. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), an antioxidant and mitochondrial cofactor, has shown promise in ALS transgenic mice, and in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases other than ALS. Our aims were to choose between two high doses of CoQ10 for ALS, and to determine if it merits testing in a Phase III clinical trial. METHODS: We designed and implemented a multicenter trial with an adaptive, two-stage, bias-adjusted, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, Phase II design (n = 185). The primary outcome in both stages was a decline in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRSr) score over 9 months. Stage 1 (dose selection, 35 participants per group) compared CoQ10 doses of 1,800 and 2,700 mg/day. Stage 2 (futility test, 75 patients per group) compared the dose selected in Stage 1 against placebo. RESULTS: Stage 1 selected the 2,700 mg dose. In Stage 2, the pre-specified primary null hypothesis that this dose is superior to placebo was not rejected. It was rejected, however, in an accompanying prespecified sensitivity test, and further supplementary analyses. Prespecified secondary analyses showed no significant differences between CoQ10 at 2,700 mg/day and placebo. There were no safety concerns. INTERPRETATION: CoQ10 at 2,700 mg daily for 9 months shows insufficient promise to warrant Phase III testing. Given this outcome, the adaptive Phase II design incorporating a dose selection and a futility test avoided the need for a much larger conventional Phase III trial.

Excellent inter-rater, intra-rater, and telephone-administered reliability of the ALSFRS-R in a multicenter clinical trial.

We wished to determine whether the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) is reliable when used as primary outcome measure in a multicenter clinical trial. To establish inter-rater reliability, we randomly assigned 19 primary raters and 11 back-up raters to score nine amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients using the ALSFRS-R. To assess intra-rater reliability and reliability of telephone administration, we randomly assigned consecutive participants of the Clinical Trial of High Dose Coenzyme Q10 in ALS (QALS) to have in-person ALSFRS-R interviews at both screening and baseline visits (n=41 patients) or to have the ALSFRS-R interview by telephone at screening and in person at the baseline visit (n=27). An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of reliability was calculated using a one-way random effects analysis of variance model. In the inter-rater reliability assessment, the primary raters performed 54 ratings on nine patients with ICC=0.93 (95% CI 0.84-0.98). For back-up raters, 32 ratings on nine patients resulted in ICC=0.93 (95% CI 0.82-0.98). The intra-rater reliability for in-person interviews was ICC = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The reliability of telephone administration compared to in-person interviews was ICC=0.97 (95% CI 0.93-0.98). We conclude that the ALSFRS-R shows excellent inter- and intra-rater reliability, and reliability of telephone administration when used as primary outcome measure in a multicenter ALS trial.

Promoting excellence in end-of-life care in ALS.

The type and quality of end-of-life care varies greatly in ALS; the time to initiate end-of-life care is not defined, and decision making is hampered by logistical and financial barriers. There has been no systematic review of these issues in ALS. The goals of this initiative are to: 1) improve end-of-life care for patients with ALS and families based on what limited evidence is available; 2) increase awareness, interest, and debate on the end-of-life care in ALS; and 3) identify areas needed for new prospective clinical research. The ALS Peer Workgroup reviewed the literature and 1) identified the current state of knowledge, 2) analysed the gaps in care, and 3) provided recommendations for standard of care and future research. It was shown that areas of investigation are needed on the incorporation of an interdisciplinary approach to care in ALS that includes: psychosocial evaluation and spiritual care; the use of validated instruments to assess patient and caregiver quality of life; and the establishment of proactive caregiver programs. Several public policy changes that will improve coverage for medical care, hospice, and caregiver costs are also reviewed. More clinical evidence is needed on how to provide optimal end-of-life care specifically in ALS.