Referral Process for Surgical Management of Tuberculosis in Lima: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung resection surgery can be a complementary therapy for managing tuberculosis (TB) complications, but access is lacking in high-burden areas. The referral process for surgical evaluation is not well described. This study aimed to elucidate the TB surgery referral process in Peru. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups and interviews of health care providers from the Peruvian National TB Program. A semi-structured interview guide was developed with local partners. Focus groups and individual interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to reconstruct the referral process and identify barriers as well as areas for improvement. RESULTS: A total of 12 sessions were recorded (7 interviews and 5 focus groups; 36 participants total). The main themes identified were: (1) Surgical referral workflow, (2) Unstandardized selection criteria for surgery, (3) Limited inter-institutional communication, and (4) Material barriers to surgical management. CONCLUSION: Health care providers involved in the referral process of surgical management of tuberculosis in Lima reported a hierarchical referral workflow. Interinstitutional communication may be a critical interventional point to improve a patient's quality of care during the referral process.

Validation of a community-based survey assessing nonobstetric surgical conditions in Burera District, Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: Validated, community-based surveillance methods to monitor epidemiologic progress in surgery have not yet been employed for surgical capacity building. The goal of this study was to create and assess the validity of a community-based questionnaire collecting data on untreated surgically correctable disease throughout Burera District, Rwanda, to accurately plan for surgical services at a district hospital. METHODS: A structured interview to assess for 10 index surgically treatable conditions was created and underwent local focus group and pilot testing. Using a 2-stage cluster sampling design, Rwandan data collectors conducted the structured interview in 30 villages throughout the Burera District. Rwandan physicians revisited the surveyed households to perform physical examinations on all household members, used as the gold standard to validate the structured interview. RESULTS: A total of 2,990 individuals were surveyed and 2,094 (70%) were available for physical examination. The calculated sensitivity and specificity of the survey tool were 44.5% (95% CI, 38.9-50.2%) and 97.7% (95% CI, 96.9-98.3%), respectively. The conditions with the highest sensitivity and specificity were hydrocephalus, clubfoot, and injuries/infections. Injuries/infections and hernias/hydroceles were the conditions most frequently found on examination that were not reported during the interview. CONCLUSION: This study provides the first attempt to validate a community-based surgical surveillance tool. The finding of low sensitivity was likely related to limited access to care and poor health literacy. Accurate community-based surveys are critical to planning integrated health systems that include surgical care as a core component.

Validation of a community-based survey assessing non-obstetric surgical conditions in Burera District, Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: Community-based surveillance methods to monitor epidemiological progress in surgery have not yet been employed for surgical capacity building. The aim of this study was to create and assess the validity of a questionnaire that collected data for untreated surgically correctable diseases throughout Burera District, northern Rwanda, to accurately plan for surgical services. METHODS: A structured interview to assess for the presence or absence of ten index surgically treatable conditions (breast mass, cleft lip/palate, club foot, hernia or hydrocele [adult and paediatric]), hydrocephalus, hypospadias, injuries or wounds, neck mass, undescended testes, and vaginal fistula) was created. The interview was built based on previously validated questionnaires, forward and back translated into the local language and underwent focus group augmentation and pilot testing. In March and May, 2012, data collectors conducted the structured interviews with a household representative in 30 villages throughout Burera District, selected using a two-stage cluster sampling design. Rwandan physicians revisited the surveyed households to perform physical examinations on all household members, used as the gold standard to validate the structured interview. Ethical approval was obtained from Boston Children's Hospital (Boston, MA, USA) and the Rwandan National Ethics Committee (Kigali, Rwanda). Informed consent was obtained from all households. FINDINGS: 2990 individuals were surveyed, a 97% response rate. 2094 (70%) individuals were available for physical examination. The calculated overall sensitivity of the structured interview tool was 44·5% (95% CI 38·9-50·2) and the specificity was 97·7% (96·9-98·3%; appendix). The positive predictive value was 70% (95% CI 60·5-73·5), whereas the negative predictive value was 91·3% (90·0-92·5). The conditions with the highest sensitivity and specificity, respectively, were hydrocephalus (100% and 100%), clubfoot (100% and 99·8%), injuries or wounds (54·7% and 98·9%), and hypospadias (50% and 100%). Injuries or wounds and hernias or hydroceles were the conditions most frequently identified on examination that were not reported during the interview (appendix). INTERPRETATION: To the best of our knowledge, this study provides the first attempt to validate a community-based surgical surveillance tool. The finding of low sensitivity limits the use of the tool, which will require further revision, and calls into question previously published unvalidated community surgical survey data. To improve validation of community-based surveys, community education efforts on common surgically treatable conditions are needed in conjunction with increased access to surgical care. Accurate community-based surveys are crucial to integrated health system planning that includes surgical care as a core component. FUNDING: The Harvard Sheldon Traveling Fellowship.