Validation of a Plasma-Based Comprehensive Cancer Genotyping Assay Utilizing Orthogonal Tissue- and Plasma-Based Methodologies.

Purpose: To analytically and clinically validate a circulating cell-free tumor DNA sequencing test for comprehensive tumor genotyping and demonstrate its clinical feasibility.Experimental Design: Analytic validation was conducted according to established principles and guidelines. Blood-to-blood clinical validation comprised blinded external comparison with clinical droplet digital PCR across 222 consecutive biomarker-positive clinical samples. Blood-to-tissue clinical validation comprised comparison of digital sequencing calls to those documented in the medical record of 543 consecutive lung cancer patients. Clinical experience was reported from 10,593 consecutive clinical samples.Results: Digital sequencing technology enabled variant detection down to 0.02% to 0.04% allelic fraction/2.12 copies with ≤0.3%/2.24-2.76 copies 95% limits of detection while maintaining high specificity [prevalence-adjusted positive predictive values (PPV) >98%]. Clinical validation using orthogonal plasma- and tissue-based clinical genotyping across >750 patients demonstrated high accuracy and specificity [positive percent agreement (PPAs) and negative percent agreement (NPAs) >99% and PPVs 92%-100%]. Clinical use in 10,593 advanced adult solid tumor patients demonstrated high feasibility (>99.6% technical success rate) and clinical sensitivity (85.9%), with high potential actionability (16.7% with FDA-approved on-label treatment options; 72.0% with treatment or trial recommendations), particularly in non-small cell lung cancer, where 34.5% of patient samples comprised a directly targetable standard-of-care biomarker.Conclusions: High concordance with orthogonal clinical plasma- and tissue-based genotyping methods supports the clinical accuracy of digital sequencing across all four types of targetable genomic alterations. Digital sequencing's clinical applicability is further supported by high rates of technical success and biomarker target discovery. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3539-49. ©2018 AACR.

Preclinical models for pediatric solid tumor drug discovery: current trends, challenges and the scopes for improvement.

INTRODUCTION: The enhancement in pediatric cancer survival achieved in the past few decades has been confined to low- and moderate-risk cancers, whereas no notable improvement in survival was observed in high-risk and advanced-stage childhood cancers. High attrition rate of candidate drugs in clinical trials is a major hurdle in the development of effective therapies for pediatric solid tumors. In order to reduce the failure rate of candidate drugs in clinical trials, more effective strategies are needed to enhance the predictability of preclinical testing. AREAS COVERED: The authors have described the current trends in preclinical drug development for treating pediatric solid tumors. Furthermore, the authors review their limitations and the available remedies, with regards to choice of models, pharmacokinetic considerations and the criteria for assessing the long-term efficacy of a candidate drug. EXPERT OPINION: In many solid tumors, common differences between pediatric and adult cancers have been observed, and therefore, clinical trials for pediatric solid tumors must be conducted on the basis of preclinical observations in pediatric solid tumor models. There is a need to invest in extensive preclinical testing on pediatric solid tumor models. None of the preclinical models can fully recapitulate the human cancers. Therefore, these limitations must be considered while conducting a preclinical trial. The dose and schedule of drugs used for preclinical testing must be clinically relevant. While testing the efficacy of drugs, the markers of apoptosis, drug resistance, hypoxia and tumor-initiating cells can inform us about the long-term therapeutic response of a cancer.