[Practice guideline 'Diagnostic techniques for soft tissue tumours and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (revision)']. / Richtlijn 'Diagnostiek bij wekedelentumoren en behandeling van wekedelensarcomen (herziening)'.

Members of the Dutch working group on soft tissue tumours developed an up-to-standard evidence-based multidisciplinary clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumours and the treatment and follow-up of soft tissue sarcomas, in cooperation with the Dutch Association of Comprehensive Cancer Centres and the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement. A soft tissue sarcoma is defined as every non-epithelial tumour that does not originate in haematopoietic or lymphatic system, central nervous system or bone. The guideline lists 'alarm signals' to raise awareness of malignancy and recommends consulting a multidisciplinary team. Non-invasive imaging has to be completed before proceeding to any invasive (diagnostic) procedure or assessment of dissemination. Aspiration cytology can be useful for differentiating between sarcoma and other malignancies. A definite diagnosis is obtained by means of image-guided needle biopsy. Tumours will be classified according to the World Health Organization and graded according to the Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Surgical excision with a tumour free margin of 2 cm is the core of therapy, taking into account vital structures when necessary. In case of small superficial tumours (diameter < or = 3 cm) excision biopsy may be justified. Radiotherapy is almost always necessary and certainly indicated when wide margins are impossible even after re-resection. In the case of primary metastatic disease, an individual decision should be taken after multi-disciplinary consultation concerning the possibility of curative or palliative treatment. Neither neo-adjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy is standard. Chemotherapy may be useful in metastatic disease. The guideline advises referring patients who are eligible for chemotherapy to a centre and that they should be included in a study protocol.

Expression of P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-associated protein 1, and lung resistance-related protein in human soft tissue sarcomas before and after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug resistance (MDR) is associated with expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MRP1), and lung resistance-related protein (LRP). Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) is able to modify the expression of these three proteins in different cell types. The effect of TNF-alpha in the clinical situation on patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) is indeterminate. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with a locally advanced extremity STS underwent hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with TNF-alpha and melphalan; 15 patients received additional interferon gamma. Clinical and histologic responses were documented and used to define the overall response. Samples before and after HILP were analyzed immunohistochemically for P-gp, MRP1, and LRP. Samples were scored as negative or positive (< or = 5% or > 5% positive tumor cells). RESULTS: Six patients had an overall complete response, 25 patients had a partial response, and 4 patients with STS revealed no change; in 2 patients, the response remained unclear. The percentage STS samples that were positive for all three proteins dropped from 92% before HILP to 85% after HILP. P-gp positive samples were encountered more often than MRP1 positive samples (P < 0.05). The percentage of samples that were negative for all three MDR proteins increased after HILP from 6% to 16%. MDR status had no significant correlation with tumor response. CONCLUSIONS: HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan results in excellent overall tumor response in patients with locally advanced STS. STS more often are positive for P-gp than for MRP1. MDR status in patients with STS is not predictive for tumor response after HILP. Data from the current study suggest that the combination of TNF-alpha and melphalan does not induce MDR positive STS: a result with clinical importance when consecutive, adjuvant, doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy is considered.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan in patients with locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas: treatment response and clinical outcome related to changes in proliferation and apoptosis.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan (HILP-TM) with or without IFN-gamma is a promising local treatment in patients with locally advanced extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), with response rates of up to 84%. The mechanisms of the treatment response are poorly understood. Here, we determined the HILP-TM-induced changes in mitotic activity, proliferation, and apoptosis in 37 STSs; the additional effect of IFN-gamma; and the association of HILP-TM with treatment response and clinical outcome. On archival material, obtained before and 6-8 weeks after HILP-TM with (n = 15) or without (n = 22) IFN-gamma, the number of mitoses was counted, and the proliferation fraction was determined by immunohistological staining for the proliferation associated Ki-67 antigen (MIB1). Apoptosis was visualized by enzymatic detection of DNA fragmentation (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling method). Clinical and histological response, follow-up status, and survival were recorded. The number of mitoses dropped 57% and proliferation rate decreased with 40% after HILP-TM, whereas the amount of apoptosis after HILP-TM more than doubled as before HILP-TM. The addition of IFN-gamma to HILP-TM did not influence the changes in tumor parameters and did not affect treatment response. A better clinical response to HILP-TM was correlated with high mitotic activity and low amount of apoptosis in tumor samples before HILP-TM. Patients with highly proliferative STS before and after HILP-TM had a relatively poor prognosis. Furthermore, patients who developed distant metastases after HILP-TM had a relatively high number of dividing cells in the tumor remnants after treatment.

Epidemiological aspects of soft tissue sarcomas (STS)--consequences for the design of clinical STS trials.

The purpose of the study was to gain insight into epidemiological aspects of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), based on the population-based cancer registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Center North-Netherlands (CCCN), and to provide data for the development of future STS clinical trials. 456 primary STS (Kaposi, urogenital and gastro-intestinal STS excluded), registered from 1989 to 1995 by the cancer registration of the Comprehensive Cancer Center North-Netherlands (CCCN), were analysed. The annual, age-adjusted, STS incidence was 3.6 per 100,000. Incidence increased with age. Half of the patients were over the age of 65 years. Malignant fibrous histiocytomas and liposarcomas were most frequently encountered. At presentation, nodal involvement was rare (3-8%). Distant metastases were more frequently encountered (9-14%), and appeared to be related to tumour size and site. Above 70 years of age, 16% of patients received no treatment at all, especially for metastatic disease.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha and melphalan as palliative limb-saving treatment in patients with locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities with regional or distant metastases. Is it worthwhile?

The management of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremities in patients who present with regional and/or distant metastases at the time of diagnosis remains an unsolved problem. The recently introduced hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha and melphalan has been shown to be an effective limb-saving treatment modality, but is it feasible to use this approach with palliative intent? Nine patients, five men and four women, mean age 41 (range 21-75) years with locally advanced extremity STS and regional (n = 3) or distant (n = 6) metastases at the time of diagnosis, underwent a palliative HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan. Resection of the residual tumour mass was performed, if possible, 6-8 weeks after HILP. Treatment-related morbidity, local recurrences and the limb salvage rate were scored during follow-up. The median follow-up period was 9 (range 3-39) months (seven deaths, but six were due to metastatic disease). Treatment-related morbidity was seen after 3 of the 10 perfusions performed (30%) and consisted of superficial wound infections (n = 2), blow out of the external iliac artery followed by an iliac thrombosis (n = 1). Two patients showed local recurrences after HILP followed by resection of the residual tumour mass, and one patient showed local progression after two perfusions without resection. Limb salvage was achieved in 8 patients (89%). Therefore, HILP with TNF-alpha and melphalan for locally advanced extremity STS in patients with disseminated disease is feasible. The local management of locally advanced extremity STS should be the same whether the intent is curative or palliative, as the local control improves the quality of life.

Feasibility and efficacy of external beam radiotherapy after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan for limb-saving treatment in locally advanced extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and melphalan is associated with a dramatic antitumor effect in locally advanced extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy after HILP with TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and melphalan and delayed surgical resection. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1991 and 1995, 34 patients--16 males and 18 females, median age 50 (range 18-80) years--underwent HILP for locally advanced extremity STS. Resection of the residual tumor mass was performed in most patients after 6-8 weeks. Fifteen patients with histopathological viable tumor after resection received adjuvant 60-70 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) (44%, HILP + EBRT group). Nineteen patients received HILP without adjuvant EBRT (56%, HILP-only group). Five patients in the HILP-only group had also distant metastases (15%) and received HILP as a palliative treatment. Treatment morbidity, local recurrences, and regional and distant metastases were scored. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 34 months (range 8-54), limb salvage was achieved in 29 patients (85%): 14 patients after HILP + EBRT and 15 patients after HILP only. None of the patients from the HILP + EBRT group developed local recurrences; however, five patients from the HILP-only did (26%) (p < 0.05). Regional metastases were observed in one patient from the HILP + EBRT group (7%) and in two patients from the HILP-only group who were treated with curative intent (14%). Distant metastases occurred in four patients after HILP + EBRT (27%) and in four patients after HILP only with curative intent (29%). The mean morbidity (subjective, objective, medical management, and analytical evaluation) score in both groups was, respectively, 0.33 for skin and subcutaneous tissue and for muscle and soft tissue, 0.34 (HILP + EBRT group) and 0.33 (HILP-only group). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant EBRT after HILP with TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, and melphalan and delayed tumor resection of locally advanced extremity STS is feasible and may increase local tumor control without increasing treatment morbidity.

Angiographic response of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma following hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), and melphalan is associated with a dramatic anti-tumor effect in which the neo-vascularization of the tumor is supposed to be the major target. The aim of the present study was to correlate the angiographic findings with the pathological response in patients undergoing HILP for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients, 14 male and 11 female, mean age 47 years (range 18-80) were studied. Angiographies were performed before and a median period of 7 weeks (range 4-14 weeks) after HILP. Eight weeks after perfusion, the residual tumor mass was resected and pathologically examined. The changes in tumor vascularization after treatment were scored and compared with the pathological response. RESULTS: All baseline angiograms showed a hypervascular tumor. After HILP, a normal angiography result (NA) was observed in 18 patients (72%) and an abnormal angiography result (AA) was observed in seven patients (28%). All patients with an NA showed a pathologically complete response (pCR) or a pathological partial response with > 90% necrosis of the tumor. Of seven patients with an AA, pathological examination showed a pCR in one patient, 10-50% viable tumor volume in four patients, and no pathological response after perfusion in two patients. A good correlation was seen between angiographic and pathological classification (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An angiography performed after hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with TNF-alpha and melphalan provides a good indication, regardless of whether a good pathological response is expected.

Hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with cisplatin in four patients with sarcomas of soft tissue and bone.

The value of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with cisplatin in the management of locally advanced soft tissue sarcomas or metastatic bone sarcoma was studied. Four patients were treated with HILP under mild hyperthermia (39-40 degrees C) with 20-30 mg cisplatin/l perfused limb volume. Toxicity in the perfused limbs was moderate, and the erythema and oedema that occurred resolved spontaneously within 7-14 days as did the slight motor and sensory neuropathy over a longer period of time. Clinically, a reduction of pain was observed in all patients. Two weeks after perfusion, tumour biopsies were taken to evaluate tumour response. Two patients showed a pathological complete response, one patient showed >90% necrosis and one patient showed no response. Currently patients are treated with tumour necrosis factor and melphalan as perfusion agents. The above-mentioned results make the combination of tumour necrosis factor with cisplatin in the isolated limb perfusion setting an interesting option.

FDG-PET to evaluate response to hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.

UNLABELLED: We investigated FDG-PET in patients undergoing hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion (HILP) with rTNF-alpha, rIFN-gamma and melphalan for locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities. METHODS: Twenty patients (11 women, 9 men; aged 18-80 yr, mean age 49 yr) were studied. FDG-PET studies were performed before, 2 and 8 wk after HILP. After the final PET study, the tumor was resected and pathologically graded. Patients with pathologically complete response (pCR) showed no viable tumor after treatment. Those with pathologically partial response (pPR) showed various amounts of viable tumor in the resected specimens. RESULTS: Seven patients showed a pCR (35%) and 12 patients showed a pPR (60%). In one patient, pathological examination was not performed (5%). The pre-perfusion glucose consumption in the pCR group was significantly higher than in the pPR group (p<0.05). Visual analysis of the PET images after perfusion showed a rim of increased FDG uptake around the core of absent FDG uptake in 12 patients. The rim signal contained a fibrous pseudocapsule with inflammatory tissue in the pCR group, viable tumor was seen in the pPR group. The glucose consumption in the pCR group at 2 and 8 wk after perfusion had decreased significantly (p<0.05) in comparison to the glucose consumption in the pPR. CONCLUSION: Based on the pretreatment glucose consumption in soft-tissue sarcomas, one could predict the probability of a patient achieving complete pathological response after HILP. FDG-PET indicated the pathological tumor response to HILP, although the lack of specificity of FDG, in terms of differentiation between an inflammatory response and viable tumor tissue, hampered the discrimination between pCR and pPR.