RESUMO
Dental anxiety is a prevalent problem with marked psychological, physical and public health implications. Based on cognitive theory and evidence, we hypothesized that vivid, sensory image-based cognitions play a role in dental anxiety. A quantitative online survey (Nâ¯=â¯306) and qualitative semi-structured interviews (Nâ¯=â¯18) found that vivid sensory images were common irrespective of dental anxiety levels, but that their content, associated distress and responses varied. Participants reporting higher anxiety experienced intense and intrusive fear-provoking dental imagery focusing on unpleasant sensations, which were associated with the intrusive recollection of negative past experiences and avoidance of dentistry. Participants with lower anxiety ratings, reported images that were less distressing and centered around reassuring aspects and positive appointment outcomes, potentially acting as protective factors against dental anxiety and facilitating appointment attendance. The inclusion of components aimed at reducing intrusive memories and dental imagery rescripting may help improve interventions for dental anxiety.
Assuntos
Cognição , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/etiologia , Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/psicologia , Imaginação , Rememoração Mental , Inquéritos e Questionários , Aprendizagem da Esquiva , Odontologia , Medo/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Managing children is a challenge that many dentists face. Many non-pharmacological techniques have been developed to manage anxiety and behavioural problems in children, such us: 'tell, show & do', positive reinforcement, modelling and hypnosis. The use of hypnosis is generally an overlooked area, hence the need for this review. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review attempted to answer the question: What is the effectiveness of hypnosis (with or without sedation) for behaviour management of children who are receiving dental care in order to allow successful completion of treatment?Null hypothesis: Hypnosis has no effect on the outcome of dental treatment of children. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), and PsycINFO. Electronic and manual searches were performed using controlled vocabulary and free text terms with no language restrictions. Date of last search: 11th June 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: All children and adolescents aged up to 16 years of age. Children having any dental treatment, such as: simple restorative treatment with or without local anaesthetic, simple extractions or management of dental trauma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Authors of trials were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.2. MAIN RESULTS: Only three RCTs (with 69 participants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were not possible due to insufficient number of studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there are a considerable number of anecdotal accounts indicating the benefits of using hypnosis in paediatric dentistry, on the basis of the three studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review there is not yet enough evidence to suggest its beneficial effects.
Assuntos
Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/terapia , Assistência Odontológica/métodos , Hipnose/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previously, we showed that systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin significantly improved the outcomes of non-surgical debridement in generalized aggressive periodontitis patients. This study aimed to observe whether re-treatment with adjunctive antimicrobials would give the placebo group benefits comparable with the test group. METHODS: Thirty-eight of 41 subjects, from the initial 6-month trial, completed the second phase, re-treatment of sites with remaining pockets 5 mm. Subjects on placebo in phase one, received adjunctive antibiotics for 7 days. Clinical parameters were collected at 2 months posttreatment (8 months from baseline). RESULTS: Patients who received antibiotics at initial therapy, showed statistically significant improvement in pocket depth reduction and in the % of sites improving above clinically relevant thresholds, compared with patients who received antibiotics at re-treatment. In deep pockets (7 mm), the mean difference was 0.9 mm (p=0.003) and in moderate pockets (4-6 mm) it was 0.4 mm (p=0.036). For pockets converting from 5 to 4 mm, this was 83% compared with 67% (p=0.041) and pockets converting from 4 to 3 mm was 63% compared with 49% (p=0.297). CONCLUSIONS: At 8 months, patients who had antibiotics at initial therapy showed statistically significant benefits compared with those who had antibiotics at re-treatment.
Assuntos
Periodontite Agressiva/tratamento farmacológico , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Análise de Variância , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Desbridamento Periodontal , Retratamento , Método Simples-Cego , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Managing children is a challenge that many dentists face. Many non-pharmacological techniques have been developed to manage anxiety and behavioural problems in children, such us: 'tell, show & do', positive reinforcement, modelling and hypnosis. The use of hypnosis is generally an overlooked area, hence the need for this review. OBJECTIVES: This systematic review attempted to answer the question: What is the effectiveness of hypnosis (with or without sedation) for behaviour management of children who are receiving dental care in order to allow successful completion of treatment? NULL HYPOTHESIS: Hypnosis has no effect on the outcome of dental treatment of children. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), and PsycINFO. Electronic and manual searches were performed using controlled vocabulary and free text terms with no language restrictions. Date of last search: 11th June 2010. SELECTION CRITERIA: All children and adolescents aged up to 16 years of age. Children having any dental treatment, such as: simple restorative treatment with or without local anaesthetic, simple extractions or management of dental trauma. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Information regarding methods, participants, interventions, outcome measures and results were independently extracted, in duplicate, by two review authors. Authors of trials were contacted for details of randomisation and withdrawals and a quality assessment was carried out. The methodological quality of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was assessed using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.2. MAIN RESULTS: Only three RCTs (with 69 participants) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Statistical analysis and meta-analysis were not possible due to insufficient number of studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although there are a considerable number of anecdotal accounts indicating the benefits of using hypnosis in paediatric dentistry, on the basis of the three studies meeting the inclusion criteria for this review there is not yet enough evidence to suggest its beneficial effects.
Assuntos
Ansiedade ao Tratamento Odontológico/terapia , Assistência Odontológica/métodos , Hipnose/métodos , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
Cylinders of Type III gold alloy were sandblasted with either: 50 micron Aluminium Oxide particles (Group 1); CoJet Sand (Group 2); the CoJet System - CoJet Sand followed by application of silane primer (Group 3). Shear testing was undertaken following apposition of Panavia 21 resin. Mean shear bond strengths (+/- standard deviation) were Group 1, 32.9 (+/-18.2) MPa; Group 2, 26.5 (+/-10.8) MPa and Group 3, 45.6 (+/- 25.8) MPa. There was no statistically difference between Group 1 and 2; and between group 1 and 3. However, there was a significant; difference between Group 2 and 3 p < 0.05). While the CoJet System achieved the highest mean shear bond strength it conveyed no statistical advantage over the traditional method of sandblasting with aluminium oxide.