Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 6(1)2022 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36053580

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The WHO Nutrition Target aims to reduce the global prevalence of low birth weight by 30% by the year 2025. The Enhancing Nutrition and Antenatal Infection Treatment (ENAT) study will test the impact of packages of pregnancy interventions to enhance maternal nutrition and infection management on birth outcomes in rural Ethiopia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ENAT is a pragmatic, open-label, 2×2 factorial, randomised clinical effectiveness study implemented in 12 rural health centres in Amhara, Ethiopia. Eligible pregnant women presenting at antenatal care (ANC) visits at <24 weeks gestation are enrolled (n=2400). ANC quality is strengthened across all centres. Health centres are randomised to receive an enhanced nutrition package (ENP) or standard nutrition care, and within each health centre, individual women are randomised to receive an enhanced infection management package (EIMP) or standard infection care. At ENP centres, women receive a regular supply of adequately iodised salt and iron-folate (IFA), enhanced nutrition counselling and those with mid-upper arm circumference of <23 cm receive a micronutrient fortified balanced energy protein supplement (corn soya blend) until delivery. In standard nutrition centres, women receive routine counselling and IFA. EIMP women have additional screening/treatment for urinary and sexual/reproductive tract infections and intensive deworming. Non-EIMP women are managed syndromically per Ministry of Health Guidelines. Participants are followed until 1-month post partum, and a subset until 6 months. The primary study outcomes are newborn weight and length measured at <72 hours of age. Secondary outcomes include preterm birth, low birth weight and stillbirth rates; newborn head circumference; infant weight and length for age z-scores at birth; maternal anaemia; and weight gain during pregnancy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: ENAT is approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Addis Continental Institute of Public Health (001-A1-2019) and Mass General Brigham (2018P002479). Results will be disseminated to local and international stakeholders. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN15116516.


Assuntos
Nascimento Prematuro , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Ácido Fólico/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido de Baixo Peso , Recém-Nascido , Ferro , Parto , Ensaios Clínicos Pragmáticos como Assunto , Gravidez , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Implement Sci ; 15(1): 1, 2020 01 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900167

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The BetterBirth trial tested the effect of a peer coaching program around the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist for birth attendants in primary-level facilities in Uttar Pradesh, India on a composite measure of perinatal and maternal mortality and maternal morbidity. This study aimed to examine the adherence to essential birth practices between two different cadres of birth attendants-nurses and auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs)-during and after a peer coaching intervention for the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of birth attendant characteristics, coaching visits, and behavior uptake during the BetterBirth trial through birth attendant surveys, coach observations, and independent observations. Descriptive statistics were calculated overall, and by staffing cadre (staff nurses and ANMs) for demographic characteristics. Logistic regression using the Pearson overdispersion correction (to account for clustering by site) was used to assess differences between staff nurses and ANMs in the intervention group during regular coaching (2-month time point) and 4 months after the coaching program ended (12-month time point). RESULTS: Of the 570 birth attendants who responded to the survey in intervention and control arms, 474 were staff nurses (83.2%) and 96 were ANMs (16.8%). In the intervention arm, more staff nurses (240/260, 92.3%) received coaching at all pause points compared to ANMs (40/53, 75.5%). At baseline, adherence to practices was similar between ANMs and staff nurses (~ 30%). Overall percent adherence to essential birth practices among ANMs and nurses was highest at 2 months after intervention initiation, when frequent coaching visits occurred (68.1% and 64.1%, respectively, p = 0.76). Practice adherence tapered to 49.2% among ANMs and 56.1% among staff nurses at 12 months, which was 4 months after coaching had ended (p = 0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, ANMs and nurses responded similarly to the coaching intervention with the greatest increase in percent adherence to essential birth practices after 2 months of coaching and subsequent decrease in adherence 4 months after coaching ended. While coaching is an effective strategy to support some aspects of birth attendant competency, the structure, content, and frequency of coaching may need to be customized according to the birth attendant training and competency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT2148952; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1131-5647.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/normas , Tutoria/organização & administração , Tocologia/normas , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/normas , Grupo Associado , Adulto , Lista de Checagem/normas , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Mortalidade Materna/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade Perinatal/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Organização Mundial da Saúde
3.
Glob Public Health ; 14(3): 396-406, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30146951

RESUMO

This anthropological study explores why more women in the rural Sierra Madre region of Chiapas, Mexico birth at home rather than at the hospital. Between January and May of 2014, the primary investigator conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with twenty-six interlocutors: six parteras (home birth attendants), nine pregnant women, four mothers, four healthcare providers, and three local government leaders. Participant observation occurred in the health clinic, participants' homes, and other spaces in a community with a population of 1,188 people. Drawing from narrative analysis, the findings suggest that women face structural obstacles to accessing high-quality childbirth care, which lead them to give birth at home instead of the hospital. These obstacles include financial barriers in obtaining facility-based care and poor quality of care, such as mistreatment in the facility. The study highlights the importance of centreing community narratives in healthcare programming in order to bridge the implementation gap between women in rural communities, healthcare workers, and policymakers.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Parto Domiciliar , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , México , Tocologia , Mães/psicologia , Narração , Gravidez , População Rural
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA