Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Virtual colonoscopy (VC)/CT colonography has advantages over the well-documented limitations of colonoscopy/barium enema. This prospective blinded investigative comparison trial aimed to evaluate the ability of VC to assess the large bowel, compared to conventional colonoscopy (CC), in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). METHOD: We studied 150 patients (73 males, mean age 60.9 years) at high risk of CRC. Following bowel preparation, VC was undertaken using colonic insufflation and 2D-spiral CT acquisition. Two radiologists reported the images and a consensual agreement reached. Direct comparison was made with CC (performed later the same day). Interobserver agreement was calculated using the Kappa method. Postal questionnaires sought patient preference. RESULTS: Virtual colonoscopy visualized the caecum in all cases. Five (3.33%) VCs were classified as inadequate owing to poor distension/faecal residue. CC completion rate was 86%. Ultimately, 44 patients had normal findings, 44 had diverticular disease, 11 had inflammatory bowel disease, 18 had cancers, and 33 patients had 42 polyps. VC identified 19 cancers--a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.2% respectively. For detecting polyps > 10 mm, VC had a sensitivity and specificity (per patient) of 91% and 99.2% respectively. VC identified four polyps proximal to stenosing carcinomas and extracolonic malignancies in nine patients (6%). No procedural complications occurred with either investigation. A Kappa score achieved for interobserver agreement was 0.777. CONCLUSION: Virtual colonoscopy is an effective and safe method for evaluating the bowel and was the investigation of choice amongst patients surveyed. VC provided information additional to CC on both proximal and extracolonic pathology. VC may become the diagnostic procedure of choice for symptomatic patients at high risk of CRC, with CC being reserved for therapeutic intervention, or where a tissue diagnosis is required.

Routine use of gastrograffin enema prior to the reversal of a loop ileostomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Anastomotic failure occurs in up to 10% of patients following anterior resection. Selective use of a loop ileostomy may reduce the septic consequences of anastomotic leak. The use of gastrograffin enema to confirm the anastomotic integrity prior to ileostomy closure is still controversial. Our aim was to determine the impact of the routine use of gastrograffin enema on patients' management prior to ileostomy reversal. METHODS: A review of 81 patients who underwent low anterior resection with loop ileostomy for rectal cancer over 3 years. RESULTS: Gastrograffin enema was performed in 69 patients (85.2%). The mean time from operation to gastrograffin enema was 22 weeks. Four patients (5.8%) had a positive radiological leak without clinical suspicion of anastomotic problems, 2 patients (2.9%) of these subsequently had the ileostomy closed despite the positive result, 2 patients (2.9%) had a gastrograffin enema repeated which showed no leak and the patients are awaiting reversal. CONCLUSION: The incidence of positive radiological leak in uncomplicated patients is low; such patients had their loop ileostomies closed with or without serial gastrograffin enema. Routine gastrograffin enema in the absence of a clinical suspicion of anastomotic failure would appear to be of little value.

Giant colonic diverticulum.

BACKGROUND: Over 100 giant colonic diverticuli have been recorded in the literature to date. The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathophysiology of their aetiology have rarely been described. AIM: To report a giant colonic diverticulum along with the MRI of this clinical entity. RESULTS: An 87 year old female presented with symptoms of tenesmus, urgency and alteration in bowel habit. A type I giant colonic diverticulum was diagnosed and a segmental colonic surgical resection was performed. The plain abdominal radiograph, barium enema and MRI, along with classification and management options are presented. CONCLUSION: Giant colonic diverticuli are rare surgical curiosities that may be successfully treated with either primary segmental or extended colonic resection.

A UK training programme for nurse practitioner flexible sigmoidoscopy and a prospective evaluation of the practice of the first UK trained nurse flexible sigmoidoscopist.

BACKGROUND: Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a technical skill that has been successfully performed by suitably trained colorectal nurse practitioners in the USA. However, no recognised training course exists for nurse practitioners in the UK. AIMS: To design and evaluate a training programme for nurse endoscopists. METHODS: A multidisciplinary committee of nurses and clinicians developed a structured programme of study and practice. This involved a staged process of observations, withdrawals, and ultimately, full procedures. Once training had been completed the nurse practitioner was permitted to practice independently. Patients with colorectal symptoms referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy were examined for the final stages of training and independent practice. A prospective evaluation of the training and practice of the first trained nurse flexible sigmoidoscopist was performed. Barium enema, video, clinical follow up, and histology were used to validate the results of the flexible sigmoidoscopies. RESULTS: The training programme required that 35 observations, 35 withdrawals, and 35 supervised full procedures were performed prior to the development of independent practice. Subsequent to the completion of this programme 215 patients have been examined independently by the nurse practitioner. Ninety three per cent of the examinations were judged successful and pathology was identified in 51%. The nurse endoscopist successfully identified all "significant" pathology whereas barium enema failed to identify pathology in 12.5%. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: With suitable training nurse endoscopists are able to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy safely and effectively.

The optimum bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy.

With the proposed introduction of a flexible sigmoidoscopic screening programme for colorectal cancer, patient compliance is of paramount importance. Therefore, the bowel preparation providing optimum cleansing of the bowel with the least associated discomfort and inconvenience for the patient must be found. Patients were randomized to receive either Picolax the evening before the examination or self-administered Fleet enemas prior to the investigation. The endoscopist and nurse practitioner who collected data on a standard questionnaire were blinded to the preparation used. Bowel preparation was graded by the endoscopist as: excellent, good, adequate or poor. One hundred and two consecutive patients were randomized: 56 to the Fleet enema group and 46 to the Picolax group. Self-administered Fleet enemas provided a significantly superior bowel preparation with 52 (93%) being judged adequate or better, as opposed to 34 (74%) in the Picolax group. In addition, Fleet enemas were associated with significantly fewer adverse associated symptoms: 11 (20%) vs 24 (52%). Patients reported to be willing to receive Fleet enemas again in 53 (95%) vs 37 (80%) for the Picolax group. The self-administered Fleet enema is superior to Picolax in terms of bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy and the incidence of associated adverse symptoms.

Vaginography--investigation of choice for clinically suspected vaginal fistulas.

PURPOSE: Vaginal fistulas are rare but can cause extremely distressing symptoms for patients and prove difficult to define anatomically. Barium studies have been reported as having a maximum sensitivity of only 34 percent for detection of vaginal fistulas. Vaginography is an alternative method for diagnosis and evaluation of suspected vaginal fistulas, which has been reported to have a sensitivity of 100 percent. We reviewed our total experience of vaginography to fully assess its capabilities. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with clinically suspected vaginal fistulas were investigated with vaginography during a six-year period. Results of vaginograms were compared with final operative or clinical diagnosis and with results of other radiologic investigations. RESULTS: Vaginography successfully identified 19 of 24 fistulas, giving a sensitivity of 79 percent. In our series, barium enema was only able to identify 9 percent of fistulas arising from the colon. CONCLUSIONS: In this, the largest series of vaginograms, apparent reduction in sensitivity from the 100 percent quoted in earlier series to 79 percent probably represents a more accurate assessment of vaginography as a diagnostic investigation. Even allowing for this reduction, vaginography is still the most sensitive, economic, and informative investigation for identification and delineation of vaginal fistulas. We recommend that vaginography be the initial investigation of choice in patients with clinically suspected vaginal fistulas.

Comparison between peripherally implanted ports and externally sited catheters for long-term venous access.

In a comparative study, we examined the use of a peripherally implantable venous access system which does not require either central venous cannulation or radiological screening. We compared the complication rate in 85 patients receiving this system with that in 112 similar patients receiving Hickman lines. In addition, we examined the safety and cost implications of using a ward setting instead of full operating facilities for port insertion. There was a 10.7% incidence of early and 37.6% incidence of late complications in the group receiving Hickman lines compared with only 2.4% early complications and 10.6% late complications in those receiving peripherally implantable ports. There was no difference in complication rates between those patients who had the ports inserted in a ward side room compared with those who had their procedure performed in the operating theatre. We have demonstrated the ease and reliability of port insertion in the absence of screening radiology and we therefore suggest the peripheral port as a safe, cost-effective alternative to existing venous access systems.