Is Clinical Exam of the Axilla Sufficient to Select Node-Positive Patients Who Downstage After NAC for SLNB? A Comparison of the Accuracy of Clinical Exam Versus MRI.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) endorses sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients with clinically positive axillary nodes who downstage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In this study, we compared the accuracy of post-NAC MRI to clinical exam alone in predicting pathologic status of sentinel lymph nodes in cN1 patients. METHODS: We identified patients with T0-3, N1 breast cancer who underwent NAC and subsequent SLNB from March 2014 to July 2017. Patients were grouped based on whether a post-NAC MRI was done. MRI accuracy in predicting SLN status was assessed versus clinical exam alone. RESULTS: A total of 450 patients met initial study criteria; 269 were analyzed after excluding patients without biopsy-confirmed nodal disease, palpable disease after NAC, and failed SLN mapping. Median age was 49 years. Post-NAC MRI was done in 68% (182/269). Patients undergoing lumpectomy vs mastectomy more frequently received a post-NAC MRI (88 vs 54%, p < 0.001). All other clinicopathologic parameters were comparable between those who did and did not have a post-NAC MRI. Thirty percent (55/182) had abnormal lymph nodes on MRI. Among these, 58% (32/55) had a positive SLN on final pathology versus 42% (53/127) of patients with no abnormal lymph nodes on MRI and 52% (45/87) of patients who had clinical exam alone (p = 0.09). MRI sensitivity was 38%, specificity was 76%, and overall SLN status prediction accuracy was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: Post-NAC MRI is no more accurate than clinical exam alone in predicting SLN pathology in patients presenting with cN1 disease. Abnormal lymph nodes on MRI should not preclude SLNB.

Selenium decreases thyroid cancer cell growth by increasing expression of GADD153 and GADD34.

Selenium (Se) supplementation is reported to decrease the incidence and total mortality of cancer. Whereas in vitro and in vivo studies have shown a decrease in prostate, lung, and liver cancers, this has not been shown in thyroid cancer. ARO (anaplastic), NPA (BRAF positive papillary), WRO (BRAF negative papillary), and FRO (follicular) cells treated with 150 microM seleno-l-methionine (SM) were assessed for viability at 24, 48, and 72 h. Treated FRO cells were examined for cell cycle using flow cytometry, for apoptosis using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and for gene expression using microarray. Genes identified as upregulated were confirmed by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) and proteins by Western blot analysis. SM treatment significantly decreased the proliferation of all cell lines. TUNEL assay showed no evidence of apoptosis, and flow cytometry showed a significant cell-cycle arrest in S (271% increase, P = 0.006) and G2/M (61% increase, P = 0.002) compared to control. Microarray revealed 21 differentially expressed genes with greater than twofold change. A relative overexpression of growth arrest and DNA damage inducible (GADD)34 and GADD153 in treated cells was confirmed with RT-PCR and Western blot. SM inhibits thyroid cancer cell proliferation through a time dependent upregulation of the GADD family of genes and arrest in S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. This is the first report of selenium induced inhibition of thyroid cancer cell growth.